| By Cat (64.12.101.158) on Friday, October 26, 2001 - 12:39 am: |
It looks like IPs are assigned at random with each post, right? The two you reference are not exactly the same. The numbers vary in the 3rd octet ~ 199 vs 198. I think this is just a coincidence.
Cathy
| By Cat (64.12.101.158) on Friday, October 26, 2001 - 12:33 am: |
I just saw this, Spade. I don't know how you are tracking IP addresses, but there is something wrong. I'm not Anajansi ~ I'm a woman. Did you think what I wrote sounded like him? Have you read any of my other posts? I don't think Anajansi would have written about what he likes about the black man. That was my perspective as a woman. Sorry for the confusion. I'd like to keep posting here, but definitely don't want to be accused of being a man masquerading as a woman. I'm really a woman ~ promise.
| By Spade (209.163.236.148) on Friday, October 12, 2001 - 09:37 pm: |
You know, guys, a man doesn't have to be a "fem-man" to please a woman. I.P Number Comparison:
Quote:
Speaking of being a man how is it you and Anajansi both share the same ip number?
Quote:
By Cat (205.188.198.58) on Wednesday, October 3, 2001 - 02:02 am:
By Anajansi (205.188.199.58) on Thursday, September 20, 2001 - 08:49 pm:
So which are you supposed to be? Anajansi or Cat? Get your lie straight before you respond.
| By Anajansi (205.188.192.159) on Wednesday, October 3, 2001 - 06:50 pm: |
Ms. Cat, Thank you so very much for the kind words of encouragement. What is life if we cannot have freedom. What is life if we cannot live out our existence to the fullest of our GOD given abilities. What is life when we cannot love. As a black man my life has been hard, but now I have my princess. It is she would has made life so fulfilling for me. No matter what happens at least I know I have someone who loves me "finally". GOD BLESS YOU, SPADE AND ALL, GOD BLESS AMERICA.
| By Cat (205.188.198.58) on Wednesday, October 3, 2001 - 02:02 am: |
You know, guys, a man doesn't have to be a "fem-man" to please a woman. There are a lot of us women out there that appreciate the difference between the sexes. I don't want a man to be a pacifist in the face of terrorist acts. I don't want him to lose himself in an effort to please me. I want an equal give and take, a sense of fair play, and a healthy respect for a difference of opinion. Neither party ought to place demands on the other person to change or to do or be something they are not. To me the biggest, most generous and loving thing a man can do is to love and appreciate who I really am. That means taking the time to learn who that is.
Also, it seems to me that most people (men and women) feel that the response to the acts of Sept 11th need to be well planned, well coordinated, direct and forceful. If anything, most people's initial emotional reaction was towards the immediate bombing of Afghanistan. I think it is very wise that the powers that be are not acting on emotion, but are instead very methodically planning a very calculated, targeted response.
Anajansi, I hope you come back to us safe and sound. I do think Americans have been given the incentive (as of 9/11) to grow a strong backbone to fight for our country. We were asleep before, but we've had a very rude awakening. I'm sure you are not the only one who has made the decision to join the armed forces.
What I think is the most troubling part of the war with Islamic terrorists is their belief that dying is noble and desirable. Bin Laden has said that he wants to die a martyr and go to his version of the afterlife. I think that it is he that will be in for a very rude awakening in the after life when he finds out how much karma he will have to repay for all the lives he's taken. Is there no concept of karma or sin or anything akin to that in the religion of Islam?
| By Anajansi (205.188.198.171) on Tuesday, October 2, 2001 - 10:14 pm: |
Mr. Spade I leave for basic training this weekend. This will be my last communication to you for now. I want to ask you do you have a website to your organization. This site does not have the intellectual dynamics that you represent in your organization. Also have you written any articles for your organization. I made a decision yesterday to ask my princess to marry me. She has accepted. The two last questions I have for you. Do you think feminism will be our undoing in our war with Islamic Fundlementalism? I fear we will lose this country. We have the technology but we do not have the will to fight, the terrorist have the will but not the technology yet. I have no doubt that someday they will successfully hit us with a weapon of mass destruction. It will be in the form of a suitcase nuclear weapon or a biological weapon. Second question to you do you think we will ever grow a real backbone as a country again? Take care Mr. Spade I hope you can get solace here in this intellectual desert.
| By Spade (216.52.252.163) on Monday, October 1, 2001 - 01:08 am: |
Anajansi, The question in my mind is how much will the man compromise in the relationship, how much will he retain to be that masculine man and gentle and understanding for his woman. It is a difficult balancing act if you have strong feeling for her. If she is worth having and you want to protect your mate from other prowling males then you must make compromises. A man should be a man. He should be strong physically, emotionally, and spiritually. But he most also be loving, tender, thoughtful and caring. It took me a long time to see this myself. I have told my princess in the beginning I will be what she wants to a point, because a man must be a man if he is to be respected by her and all he competes with. I agree with you on one point you made if she becomes so independent that you become just a figurehead to her, then lead her to the door so she can find someone else master.
I'm not against a woman changing a man unless he is changed into something I loathe. We all are imperfect and have things we need to work on and if its those things that a woman is trying to change I don't see a problem. But that's not what I was referring to. Do I believe in spoiling a woman? Yes. But not just any woman or every woman because most are not worth it so they're better left alone. Just the same as most men are really not worth women dealing with (in my opinion of course). If you're going to spoil a woman then do so on your own terms not because she manipulated you to do it, blackmailed or made you feel guilty to do it, make you feel obligated to do it, or fuss at you to get you to do it.
Quote:
That should already be established by the man before he gets into any relationship with a woman. Its a individual factor that will vary. You should know as much as you can where you stand with yourself and what your limits are and how willing you are to bend and compromise. There are men that don't give any of these details a thought until AFTER they've already engaged themselves with the opposite sex if ever.
Quote:
No it isn't or rather it shouldn't be. It may be difficult for YOU because you're trying to establish where you stand in both respects as opposed to reverting back to a Fem-man.
Quote:
That's Fem-man jargon you're talking. If she is worth having then you shouldn't have to make compromises just to keep her. YOU should know how much you are going to compromise and how much you need to compromise to transcend in oness. Granted there is onenes in the first place because if there is then she's not going anywhere regardless of how many prowling males there are. She would be just as defensive for you as you are for her. You should only have to protect her from the physical danger of prowling males, not the danger of her leaving you for one of them.
Quote:
First let me say that my past comments were not aimed at you, your woman, or relationship but was made in general. If the two of you actually have love then there so be little between the two of you in respects to this masculine issue because it really won't be a issue at all.
| By Anajansi (152.163.204.188) on Sunday, September 30, 2001 - 09:55 pm: |
Mr. Spade granted women do try to change us. My princess is trying to change me. The question in my mind is how much will the man compromise in the relationship, how much will he retain to be that masculine man and gentle and understanding for his woman. It is a difficult balancing act if you have strong feeling for her. If she is worth having and you want to protect your mate from other prowling males then you must make compromises. A man should be a man. He should be strong physically, emotionally, and spiritually. But he most also be loving, tender, thoughtful and caring. It took me a long time to see this myself. I have told my princess in the beginning I will be what she wants to a point, because a man must be a man if he is to be respected by her and all he competes with. I agree with you on one point you made if she becomes so independent that you become just a figurehead to her, then lead her to the door so she can find someone else master.
| By Anajansi (152.163.204.188) on Sunday, September 30, 2001 - 09:42 pm: |
Mr. Spade is it wrong for a man to spoil his woman. I agree with some things you have said about men letting women have their way, but is it not true as the French nobles use to say, "If you spoil your woman then all the pleasures of a woman will be bestowed on you". Granted I think here in america that has become a one way street in the gender wars, but think about, I think many men relent to their women because, they not only truly love them, but they feel guilt in historical terms of male domination that was grossly unfair to the woman. With us black men white women tend to see us a partners of oppression from their white males. Could this explain why historically white women and black men were thrust together because each side were willing to forgo the power and priviledge trip that each were victims of? I mean black men tend to give in more to a woman whereas especially with white women, they may be less confrontational with him the black man because, of his past bondage and her sufferage.
| By Anajansi (152.163.204.188) on Sunday, September 30, 2001 - 09:26 pm: |
Mr. Spade I could sit all day and talk to you. You bring up some fascinating points beyond the norm of conventional thinking at least with those who I associate with. I understand that British Intelligence has reported recently that there has been some unusually high trading on the world finacial market in those industries affected by the terrorist attack prior and during the time of the attack. Someone or a group of people knew the impending event that was to happened and cashed in on a tragedy. That story was quickly buried since the week of terror. Mr. Spade if what you are saying has any truth in it then we are in greater peril than the world realize. I have heard of secret organizations that determine the course of world events before. But I have never have given it much thought until you have stuck this mental seed in my mind. It has been said that events like the great depression, giving fascist a free hand such as Hilter, our involvement in wars from Vietnam to Desert Storm, Kennedy brothers and king's assassinations, and many events are tied to decisions made by extremely wealthy and powerful people who decide our fate. Let me give you one more. Illegal immigration. corporations have decided that their is no loyalty to any one race in this country but only to the almighty buck. It has been decided that this country will look less white european and more like the world because of the big bucks that a tiny elite will make from it all.
| By Spade (209.223.44.10) on Sunday, September 30, 2001 - 05:52 am: |
Anajansi, Mr. Spade I forgot to ask you. Did the formation of the promise keepers and the fabled million man march by minister farrahan in the early 1990's was seen as a threat to the feminist movement. I recalled a black woman by the name of Deloris Kelly who was a member of a national black women's organization who said "that getting that many black men together may mean we sisters will have to watch our step". A group of political activist
Quote:
The movements you've mentioned were only threats temporarily. As soon as the men went back to their women most of the masculine energy wore off. Still, when these movements were given attention and focus you had comments similar to those of Deloris Kelly and for good reason. So long as men united together under a single cause without the intervention of women there beside them the power of feminism lost its grip very quickly. But only for a little while because feminism isn't the only thing that would have lost its grip (There is a long standing technique of controlling men through their women and it is alive and well today). The million man march reminds me of this story:
Quote:
were attempting to show the
Master how their ideology
would change the world.
The Master listened carefully.
The following day he said,
"An ideology is as good or
bad as the people who make
use of it. If a million
wolves were to organize for
justice, would they cease
to be a million wolves?
-Anthony De Mello
As for the rest of your questions, its simply a matter of understanding the wide feminism and Fem-man effects that have saturated society and have become a quiet politically correct law.
Black women give black men a hard time if they date out their race, especially if they date a whitewoman. And for the most part all the black men do is move quietly along with mild resistance giving these silly women more room with which to wreak more havoc and talk more trash. When black men defend themselves against such women (and I'm not talking about those men just trying to start something) then they are told (among many things) they are putting down black women for white women. They'll even claim that black women don't put down black men like black men do black women which is a MASSIVE LIE in itself. If you're a Fem-man you let that crap slide because you don't want to get into it so you let them have their way. Thus feeding into that "don't agrue with a woman you'll never win" cliche Fem-man bullcrap.
Everytime I look around I see some woman going on about the "standard of white european beauty" and Fem-men go right along with it. It should be called the "standard of insecurity." I don't know about you but most men love a beautiful woman regardless of what race she is. Even if a man is prejudice and sees a beautiful woman of a race he doesn't like he'll still give her credit for being beautiful even if he just says it mentally to himself. This eurpoean standard of beauty is a cop out excuse for women who don't measure up to other beautiful women, whether that beauty be African, European, Asian, Martian, or whatever. But the Fem-men don't come out and crush this issue but rather go on to help entertain the nonsense, hence the theory breeds and the Fem-men multiply with compassion.
Then there's this make believe stuff about men being intimidated by the strong, beautiful, independant, and intelligent woman (the concept is loaded in women's magazines). That's garbage too. What man in his right mind would be intimidated by women like that? If anything he would be trying to ask her out (if he's not a Fem-man of course). Number one, being strong, independant, and intelligent is what its going to take to survive and take care of yourself in this world. If you are a mature adult taking care of yourself (paying your own bills, etc) that is what you ought to be doing. There's nothing extraordinary about that because its the law of nature. Furthermore many of the women who make that accusation exaggerate. First of all they're not as beautiful as they claim more like plain, with the exceptions of them going all out to buy a new dress, getting their hair done, and beefing up the make-up. Number two, they are not all that strong with the exception of kicking out a very funky attitude and throwing the fact that they can take care of themselves as if they've really proclaimed something. Number three, they're not all that intelligent because if they were there would not be a number one or number two (makes no difference of how many years they spent in college, actually if one considered their formal education it would make things more embarassing). Then to top all that off they act as if they're being put into bondage if asked to cook regularly, keep themselves up, keep a tidy home, or do things to be more considerate for the men in their lives because they have to work and take care of themselves. But wait! A moment ago they were saying how strong and intelligent they were yet they're not "strong" enough to take care of themselves and cook a little extra on a regular basis for their men. Then again maybe they don't know how to cook in which case they're not as "intelligent" as they let on. And maybe they're not "intelligent" enough to manage their time or "strong" enough to keep in shape further giving rise to them not being as "beautiful" as they say. Ah, but men are not suppose to say all that though. And if you're a woman who happens to take care of herself and do all the extra things to please her man then you'd better keep quiet. Don't be bold and try to defend yourself as a good woman who really takes pride in taking care of her man and being adored for it, you don't want to end up like the Disgusted White Girl do you?
A man should be able to cook, clean, and do all the things that's required to take care of himself. That way when a woman starts going on about how she's not going to cook you can tell her you don't need her macaroni and cheese, send her home, and cook a real gourmet meal. If she starts talking trash about doing your dirty laundry as if its some kind of spectacle to perform, you can send her back to her own house, seperate your colored clothes from your whites, put a load in the washer with a scoop of detergent, twist the dial and get that washing machine going and move on. Iron your own clothes, keep your living area clean and neat, set some time to work out. Woman giving you a hard time? Lead her to the door. After all she is independant and can take care of herself remember?
The interesting thing is that women aren't really all that attracted to Fem-men. They like to convert men into Fem-men. A by the looks of things they're doing a good job...
| By Spade (209.223.44.10) on Sunday, September 30, 2001 - 03:44 am: |
Anajansi, Mr. Spade,why not start a new movement among men who can be a counterforce for this movement of fem-men. What this country needs is an alternative. Men like yourself could form a new movement similar to the promise keepers, but this new movement and organizations will insitute the real men and what it mean to be men in this dangerous world. Mr. Spade we need men like yourself who can show the way. I fear what we are seeing in the fem-men, gays, lesbians, and all the other cultural and social groups bent on redefining this country is an attempt to assert their will over us whether we like it or not. The world is watching us. We need a leader or leaders like yourself who can bring together a force to be reackon with that will say to the world american men are strong masculine and willing to stand on principles that made this country great. We need the rock hard john waynes, teddy roosevelts, jackie robinsons, john kennedys, harry trumans, muhammed ali's, and yes even the spade's in this time of great need for strong men.
Quote:
You forgot to add Jesus to your list, and thank you for your compliments. I absolutely agree that this country needs an alternative and I intend on representing that alternative albeit without forming a coalition, but rather individually. Years ago I created the S.P.A.D.E (Spreading positivity and delivering eduaction) organization for that very reason and I have been leading ever since in my own way. But my emphasis will always be and continues to be soley on the person. God has his time table for all events and things will happen to fulfill that time table at the time he directs, we all can only do what he allows us to do. We must do what we can when we can. One step at a time.
| By Spade (209.223.44.10) on Sunday, September 30, 2001 - 03:14 am: |
Anajansi, Mr. Spade you surprise me. Do you really believe the terrorist attack was a manufactured event by some shadowy secret clandestine organization or even from our own government for some diabolical purpose. That is the gist I get from that article you posted that perhaps like other questionable events in history like getting into a war to spur economic growth, wealth creation, geopolitical advantage etc, some secret rulers meant this to happen. I had to think long and hard on this before answering your article. Please clarify the thought process for me.
Quote:
I want you to understand that I believe in the truth and it is not always what one wants to hear or what others want you to say. The article that I posted presented another very possible means for the attack. Whether or not a person believes a thing to be true makes no difference. Truth in itself is not dependant on belief. Let me say it another way, in question form as you did above:
Stereotypically the first thing that comes to my mind when someone says terrorist is airplanes. Even the depiction of main stream media and hollywood films who portray terrorist figures usually do so with the hijacking of planes. You don't have to be in special forces to know such things, its pretty much common sense. And yet with all the federal agencies who monitor terrorist activity and got DUE WARNING from a number of different sources long before hand of a possible attack America has zero INTELLIGENCE until AFTER the act has been pulled off in which case evidence (click here)is practially everywhere???
If the attack was so well coordinated for FIVE YEARS without a single leak then why would the terrorists who pulled off the attack leave behind so much evidence especially if there are MORE terrorist cells still in America that they have to hide?
The first line of defense against terrorism in America is the American citizens because they will be targeted first. Americans need to train themselves and be aware so as to combat terrorism when not given a choice. Tell me, how often have heard the media bring that up?
Have you forgotten that the FBI was linked to the World Trade Center bombing in the past or did you even know? (click here and click here)
Do you really expect me to believe that someone can simply hijack a plane and crash it into THE PENTAGON without any military or law enforcement to stop them and not think that strange???
I'm not satisfied with the explanation given for the supposed collapse of the World Trade Center buildings and the way it collasped. For all intents and purposes those buildings fell pretty easily and almost straight down. I remember the Oklahoma City Bombing and the cover up of two additional bombs there that the media DIDN'T REPORT! You don't see anything fishy about that?( click here)
| By Anajansi (152.163.201.203) on Saturday, September 29, 2001 - 05:11 pm: |
Mr. Spade you surprise me. Do you really believe the terrorist attack was a manufactured event by some shadowy secret clandestine organization or even from our own government for some diabolical purpose. That is the gist I get from that article you posted that perhaps like other questionable events in history like getting into a war to spur economic growth, wealth creation, geopolitical advantage etc, some secret rulers meant this to happen. I had to think long and hard on this before answering your article. Please clarify the thought process for me.
| By Anajansi (152.163.201.203) on Saturday, September 29, 2001 - 04:40 pm: |
Mr. Spade I forgot to ask you. Did the formation of the promise keepers and the fabled million man march by minister farrahan in the early 1990's was seen as a threat to the feminist movement. I recalled a black woman by the name of Deloris Kelly who was a member of a national black women's organization who said "that getting that many black men together may mean we sisters will have to watch our step". Also why is it OK for women to have their own gender based organizations but men cannot? Why is is OK to have a Girl Scout Club but not a Boy Scout Club? Why is Title 9 alright for women's sports but male sports are starved for funds and in many places male sports programs are replaced for women sports programs? Why is it alright for black women to have female only schools and classrooms in some cities but not for black males? What is the secret agenda with the fem-men sucking up to feminist organizations for changes in the parental rights issues in the courts.
| By Anajansi (152.163.201.203) on Saturday, September 29, 2001 - 04:23 pm: |
Mr. Spade,why not start a new movement among men who can be a counterforce for this movement of fem-men. What this country needs is an alternative. Men like yourself could form a new movement similar to the promise keepers, but this new movement and organizations will insitute the real men and what it mean to be men in this dangerous world. Mr. Spade we need men like yourself who can show the way. I fear what we are seeing in the fem-men, gays, lesbians, and all the other cultural and social groups bent on redefining this country is an attempt to assert their will over us whether we like it or not. The world is watching us. We need a leader or leaders like yourself who can bring together a force to be reackon with that will say to the world american men are strong masculine and willing to stand on principles that made this country great. We need the rock hard john waynes, teddy roosevelts, jackie robinsons, john kennedys, harry trumans, muhammed ali's, and yes even the spade's in this time of great need for strong men.
| By Spade (209.221.197.10) on Saturday, September 29, 2001 - 03:51 pm: |
Anajansi,
The Fem-Man is disillusioned, I do not believe in "eliminating" them physically but rather changing the polarity back to a more masculine one in such a fashion that they do not go from one extreme to the other. To suggest quiet elimination would be playing into the hands of Fem-Men and women who support them. Liberty and freedom is the right of every human being and that cannot be jeapordized. The problem must be approached from an humane, discerning, and wise standpoint albeit with firmness. The Fem-man needs to be seen for what he is (a feminized man). But not just the Fem-man, because naturally any attack on the Fem-man will lend defense by women that help make them that way so such women must be exposed too. One has to get through all the red tape and politically correct filler and address core issues. But I'll get into that a little later.
As for the media coverage and the absent minded reporters who use freedom of the press to give away details of military positions to the enemy you have to understand something. If the government didn't want the American people to know about certain things then the American people wouldn't know. Do not believe for an instant that the government is as seemingly powerless as they have let on recently. There have been plenty of cover-ups and hidden information that the majority of Americans may never know. Be that as it may I understand your anger because it is quite stupid. The things the media should not put so much emphasis on they do and the things they should put so much emphasis on they don't. It should not be so surprising to you that you have seen very little images of strong military men because in truth you see very little images of strong men period. That's one of the problems. The issue of masculine men has been discussed before but never really in serious detail. Its usually only mentioned lightly and those that do mention it stop as to not offend the women folk who may be listening or reading the information.
| By Anajansi (64.12.105.59) on Friday, September 28, 2001 - 10:53 pm: |
Mr. Spade It is my belief that the fem-men will be willing to give up this country for a takeover than fight for its survival. Mr. Spade, I heard today that the Chinese are saying that our lack of immediate response to the Twin Tower Attack is proof that we are not as strong as we should be and the fem men is no doubt the image they see all the time in our media. This is dangerous. It is my belief that these potential enemies see american men as not having the will to fight. I think the belief that we are soft as a result of the feminist movement and political correctness is proof that this country is ripe for a takeover or attack. The fem-men in the media are telling the enemy were our troops are located. This is crazy. The fem-men are using the media to sway public opinion and telling the terrorist our military strength. The fem-men hate the image of a tough military man. When was the last time you seen a positive image of a strong military man. The fem-men will not let you see this. These traitors like the terrorist should be systematically eliminated as enemies as quietly as possible.
| By Anajansi (64.12.105.59) on Friday, September 28, 2001 - 10:05 pm: |
Mr. Spade when I looked at the young faces of the 19 architects of terror (hyjackers of the day September 11, 2001) I'm convinced that these people intended to kill us. They hate our way of life. They hate our freedom given to our women, they hate our support for Israel. I enlisted today into United States Navy. I will leave soon. I feel its my duty to fight evil that is determine to destroy our way of life, prevent women from being equals, and impose their values and culture on the west something they could not achieve in the last thousand years since the Crusades. I will respond soon to your excellent article.
| By Anajansi (152.163.213.57) on Thursday, September 27, 2001 - 08:31 pm: |
Mr. Spade you have given me much to reflect on. I must absorb this information from a thinker. I will respond shortly. Mr. Spade I want you to know I will enlist into the service tomorrow to fight enemies both foreign and domestic.
| By Spade (209.163.236.148) on Thursday, September 27, 2001 - 05:53 pm: |
And one other thing Anajansi, before we go on to kick "terrorist asses" we should start at home first. The terrorist are not the only enemy facing America -- terrorism has been alive and well in the United States for some time.
| By Spade (63.251.163.82) on Thursday, September 27, 2001 - 01:18 am: |
Before I get into the crux of the Fem-Man issue I want to answer Anajansi's comments from another post: The deballed american male is the Seinfied type. I'm pissed and sick and tired of this sensitive male who will allow us to be desensitized to not want to kick the terrorist asses. Everywhere I look around me I see the fem-men as Spade describe who are programming us to believe that we need not to go to war but we need to be sensitive. We need to bring the killers to american justice so that the american lawyers can get rich and we can all feel good and respect diversity with a dash of political correctness. Spade help me.
Quote:
Indeed, this is precisely the kind of Fem-men logic you'll find men projecting in high degrees. With the recent terrorist events that have befallen the United States it should be understood by Americans that they are not dealing with an enemy that should be attributed sensitivity. Bearing in mind there are complicated factors that have to be taken into consideration and no one wants to see more innocent blood spilled. All loss of life should be minimized as much as possible. HOWEVER sacrifices must be made to defend the country due to the actions of recent terrorists. Those terrorist did not care to negotiate or be diplomatic. They had a mission to kill and destroy and that is exactly what they did. While one cannot be brazen and jump carelessly to revenge, swift and seriously firm action must be taken with discernment to not only provide justice for the lives taken and the way of life that is under fire but also show beyond a shadow of a doubt that such actions will not be tolerated! It is outright foolish for Fem-men and other women to clamor on about sensitivity, understanding, and so forth when the enemy that threatens them doesn't care a darn bit about any of that and would gladly make them fodder for their cause. And believe me nothing would set me off more then to have my wife, brother, or family member die horribly in a terrorist act of war and have a bunch of twits moan about how I should be understanding and sensitive. When you have someone beloved mangled beneath thousands of tons of concrete and steel you do not want to be understanding or sensitive to such an enemy nor should you. In fact it shows a merit of unsensitivity to suggest such. It is also unsensitive to want soldiers (of whom are fathers and husbands who have family that loves them dearly) to rush out and lose their lives in war. Still, an act of war has been established through senseless violence and as soldiers they have a responsiblity and duty to protect and serve their country otherwise there would be no family to return to whether it is theirs or anyone else's. As soldiers they understand that upon entering battle they may not ever return home and if they do it is not guaranteed that they will come back in one piece or healthy. But that is the risk you take as a soldier to protect the people you love in the face of danger.
I've heard it said that by taking military action America makes itself as bad as the terrorists. That's Fem-Man crap! America would be as bad as the terrorists if they sent their own team of hijackers to hijack a vehicle, full of unsuspecting people that could not fight back, and crash it into a building full of civilians. THEN America would be as bad as the terrorists!
The Fem-Man has spent so much time reading into femiminist language and manipulation he doesn't recognize how hazardous it could be to him and to the women he sides with. Women have a habit of chalking nearly any violence up as stupid, casting even the noble deeds of violence for their protection in the same category, with Fem-men nodding their heads in agreement like mindless yes-men. The Fem-Man is only supposed to be violent for a woman's purpose. If she doesn't agree he's not suppose to do it and he doesn't. If of course he does it anyway he's sure to be met with the utmost scorn and rejection by her and finds himself crawling to get back into her good graces.
She might fuss all day about our country going to war (which in itself isn't bad) and how we shouldn't engage in it. At the same time she'll expect action if Jack the ripper were running after her ready to cut her to pieces. All the while she will not draw a parallel between the two seemingly different circumstances. And again the Fem-men are in full agreement even though they know better. The contradictions and inconsistent behavior is expansive.
If you hijack my plane with some box cutters and plastic knives you're doomed! You might blow me and everyone else up if you and terrorist crew have a bomb but you had better pray you hit that button before I seal your fate. If you're a rapist and you're after a woman I care about prepare to have your dink in a plastic bag labeled Exhibit A in the court hearing because I will not have mercy on you. There will be no sensitivity and understanding, just Spade whipping your butt from one end of the earth clear to the other end with a divine wrath. That's what it means to be a man who is willing to give his life for what he believes in and the people he cares about. All other Fem-man talk is just a play on words.