We continue to accuse the Tea Party of being a racially motivated political entity and we are succeeding in that feat. I think it would benefit us (both WW and BM) if we invested more time studying how politics in Washington does in fact have an impact on us and our coupling, specifically. It is best if we find ways to limit the Tea Party's political power and potential for the sake of our well being. http://www.realclearpolitics.com/vi...errorists_obama_would_pal_around_with_us.html
She'll have to undergo the "Role Experiment" where she's no longer Sarah Palin and instead, she's Leticia Washington, the big booty black woman from Atlanta, Georgia. She'll get a wake up call them.
John Kerry is on our side folks, here's his in-direct response against Palin and the Tea Party. http://www.realclearpolitics.com/vi...lity_to_not_give_equal_time_to_tea_party.html
I am *very* sick of the idea that everyone is entitled to their own facts. They are entitled to their own opinions, sure as hell, but facts are, as John Adams said, "Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence." (1770, in defense of the British soldiers accused in the Boston Massacre)
I think I understand what you're attempting to say. I would like your definition of what can constitute as being a genuine fact, instead of an opinion.
Fact: Something which can be said to exist, reality, truth. Something which is known. For example, it is a fact that the unemployment rate is high. It is an opinion that it is high because "Obama is a socialist." (heh...I wish!)
I almost fell over when a FB friend of mine posted she was supporting Bachmann. When she was asked why she said because she thought Bachmann was the smartest person running, waay smarter than Palin. They're both as stupid as a box of hair.
True. So can I say, do you think it's a fact that we need to raise taxes on the wealthy so we can find a faster way to improve our economy? I think this is a fact, but please correct me if I'm wrong. I guess it would be Anti-Palin, Anti Tea Party, etc. I don't like her communication style.
I think it's a fact that we need to increase revenue. It's my opinion that the fairest, quickest, and most effective means of doing so is to cancel the Bush tax cuts for those making over $250,000/year.
Or at the very least cut corporate loop holes. How can anyone think it's right that a company like GE who made 14 billion dollars paid no taxes and got rebate money too. How can that be right?
I've come to the conclusion that it's the United States...nothing more, nothing less. The majority of people vote out of fear and when hope rears itself, they simply ignore it or perceive it as a threat. Increasing revenue would be an excellent idea. But that shouldn't be the sole answer, unless we want to increase the projected length of when we can fully get out of this crisis. It's never right especially when the low income people pay more taxes compared to the rest and more likely to get scrutinized and treated like the bane of society when they dodge taxes.
She is a bonfide racist. In a meeting with a black citizens council in Alaska in regards to her administration hiring blacks she said "I dont have to hire any" This women has no business in national politics at all.
