I will admit I have and will continue to chubby chase

i'll be honest, i don't know women's sizes. but i believe this person is larger (i put in size 16 and she showed up... lol) and she aint no stand-in for a character in Shallow Hal. hahaha!!!

Official+Miss+England+Bikini+2008+Photocall+Bxd5NMKqWSIl.jpg


plus... i've seen some big women that carried the proportions with them. just cause they got hips didn't mean it was all width. if ya get my drift.
but ultimately there isn't much debate here... i don't think a specific mind can be moved to appreciate other zones. a lot of people have a taste for a dish but only if it is prepared a certain way. so be it.

i can dig her. I like em from skinny to this rite here. she is chubby not fat
 
If you're looking for the hole and and one knows that could be a difficult task, you can resort to the tire technician method in trying to locate puncture. Dip her in a bathtub full of water and look for bubbles.

LOL!
 
women would more likely to chubby chase than men would because they are less shallow. overall

i don't agree with that at all. more fat women have men, than fat men have women. also, the term chubby chaser suggests someone who likes a heavier woman, not that they aren't shallow and look past it... they actually want to see it. ya dig.
 
women would more likely to chubby chase than men would because they are less shallow. overall

How can person's preference be considered shallow?

Since the topic is based on physical attributes, everyone has a right to choose what he or she finds physically attractive. I need not state the obvious on what will occur if both parties do not find one another physically attractive.

If one only focuses on physical appearance and do not take the mental aspect into consideration then, they can be classed as being shallow. The only girls I know that follow the above scenario are 15-18 year olds.

Cheers!
 
this is crystal renn

nys3tz.jpg


the larger version is her now which i prefer than what she looked like before

crystal-renn-model425sc082409.jpg


crystal-renn1.jpg


she's a uk 14-18 which would be a us 12-16
 
I always believe that not everyone look good on the same weight some look nice with few extra kilos some look good under weight ..

and few extra kilos not bad and no need to be always small size not for everyone.

and i said way too many times too .... bad is when your are too much (obese) or just ( bones ) and does affect your health..
 
I always believe that not everyone look good on the same weight some look nice with few extra kilos some look good under weight ..

and few extra kilos not bad and no need to be always small size not for everyone.

and i said way too many times too .... bad is when your are too much (obese) or just ( bones ) and does affect your health..

Agreed. Up this^^^.
 
I gotta bullshit. The two ladies you guys listed as size 12-14 are models the absolute best example of that size not to mention they are really tall a woman who is 5'3 will look completely different at 5'3.
 
I gotta bullshit. The two ladies you guys listed as size 12-14 are models the absolute best example of that size not to mention they are really tall a woman who is 5'3 will look completely different at 5'3.

yea but a 5'10" size 12 is a different shape than a 5'3" size 12. the shorter woman would have a smaller dress size for the parallel to be the same. the shorty in a 12 would be like the tall one in like a size 20. that math sound about right, ladies?
 
they have this model listed as a size 20 at a JPG runway show. but i think her bottom half is much bigger than that.

gaultier.jpg


she leanin wit it tho. "strut ya stuff, mamita!" :eek:
 
Back
Top Bottom