My heart goes out to all the unemployed dudes out there. They aint getting laid. Meanwhile, two thirds of men said they would date unemployed women. I actually thought it'd be even higher than that lol. More proof that men are less shallow http://www.livescience.com/21194-dating-unemployed-men-women.html
I wouldn't want to date someone unemployed, and I would hope it would go both ways. I just feel like equal footing is required. If you lost your job while we were dating, thats a different story, but to start out? Nah.
To be fair i wouldnt date if I was unemployed. That time is better spent finding a job unless I hit the lottery lol
think outside the box ladies, a man can be unemployed with residual income. would you date him then? i can agree with OP men are less shallow and some would love someone with no job cleaning, cooking and sucking. but you would still go out with the boys right? whats the difference? spending $100 with ya boys or $100 with a breezy?
I wont had a problem to date someone without work I will mostly care if he was always unemployed and if he lazy rather that he have no work.... if previously was working and looking for work i wont mind people can lose their job anytime anyways everyone know what i am trying to say no need to explain better
Depends on why he's unemployed. Is it temporary due to the economy or other legit circumstances? Or is unemployment a pattern or way of life? Misfortune can hit anyone especially nowadays. But chronic unemployment is a red flag.
That's exactly what I was thinking. Male or female, the top priority should be finding a job...dating and/or socializing wouldn't even be on my mind if my finances weren't in order.
To date a man without any income- isn't attractive at all. I've made that experience once and I have to say honestly, not a second time this will happen to me. It's a different story, as mentioned, if someone is in a change, looking for a new job or business, or if he stays at home with kids, animals and takes care for the household. But a lazy couch potatoe that is watching TV the whole day and I have to take care about anything...definitly NO
But honestly, who spends Fri & Sat nights job hunting? I can see refraining for financial reasons, but after a long week of networking, sending out resumes, not hearing from jobs you've applied to, etc., a date would be a welcome and pleasurable to way to spend an evening. And it doesn't have to be expensive. Burgers on the grill & a game of Scrabble with someone I enjoy is a date to me. Or, going out for coffee & a piece of pie.
I've been unemployed by a company since 11-11-11 however am still able to travel all over the country and live life, 'socializing' and all. sure i cant go out and get the new lexus gs until my next contract starts in a few days but that doesn't mean i stay home... just because someone is unemployed doesn't mean they cant be date able, that's almost as bad as saying ill date someone with a job but if they become unemployed i cant be with them. it all boils down to this. a man/woman can be unemployed and still have income. i think no income is worst than simply being unemployed. i can agree with you to a point. if people dont get that socializing some get depressed. there was a study done a while back about the recession and how there was a rise in movie goers and apps for mobile phones. people still need to do something that pleases them when they are unemployed. i think its a difference between unemployed and no residuals and unemployed with residuals.
The context of this thread implies no income fam. Bottom line no romance without finance. Love is free bht relationships cost
For men yeah. But for women? Not really. I'd be all about dating an unemployed hot blonde(with a nice personality). I wouldnt give a fuck if she didnt have a career. And a LOT of men would be the same way in my thinking. Women (even in 2012) still look for providers, guys with fat wallets. Nothing has changed really.
If you say so..then look for a hot blond, lazy couch potatoe that expects from you to pay for the Nanny, for her Prada stuff and her coiffeur, while she is sitting at home or meets her friends or goes shopping. We are not talking about big wallets, we are talking about lazy men without perspective, except robbing us our (womens) money. How many women have to take care alone for their and the childrens daily food, because he doesn't care? Shall they feed him now, too?
Provider and fat wallet aren't synonymous. A man can make a decent living and have good financial sense and be a great provider. He doesn't need to be wealthy.
