Let me break it down. It wasn't an assumption. (look whose assuming now, lol) It was an example. A woman....who fucks on the first night...because she finds the man attractive. Dates 30 men in one month. Finds same 30 men attractive. Chooses to fucks same 30 men. Cool with you right, right? You said it has nothing to do with her as a person when choosing her as your mate. That's what you said. That her house being unkempt or kids looking scruffy <-- that is what would stop you from pursing her. But not if she fucks virtual strangers on the first night. OK.
You are assuming that because she is on a first date that they are strangers...FIRST DATE is not the same as BLIND DATE. You keep saying strangers. There's nothing to break down. You are using the absurd to make a point. And it's just not working hun. Sowwy :smt102
I know that's your girl, but this was just in her last post bae - "But not if she fucks virtual strangers on the first night. OK."
Yes because every chick you have ever gone on a first date with is someone you have known since high school, and your families know each other well. Are you serious? Its funny how you complain about my 30 date example, but when I call you on OUR anomaly example, yours is perfectly ok to use. Next time think about what YOU write before you decide to come at me about having assumptions and chauvinistic thoughts -- telling me that's not how men think - yet in the next breath you tell Ches that to most men, women are conquests. LOL, assumptive chauvinistic thought much?
When did I say every girl I go on a first date with I've known since high school? Did I say most men or MANY men? Babe, you can't play poker with a card shark. I get paid to pay attention to detail. I have the memory of an elephant. Nothing you say is even remotely correct and all one has to do is go back and re-read. Smh. I always think before I speak/write...which you yourself can go back and refresh your memory if you'd like. In fact, I agreed with you holding out for you. Just made some other points in conjunction to it.
Bruh, she's fiesty and refuses to admit any type of incorrectness. It's attractive as fuck though, lmfao!!!;-)
I think dude's point is just because a woman had sex with him on the first night doesnt mean every dude with a nice smile is gonnq get some too.
And it definitely doesn't mean she's gonna fuck the next 29 men she meets within a month. Like, c'mon son...really? Doing something once is no indication on ever doing it again...let alone repeatedly, and within a short period of time. It just aint true bruh
Stop with the 'blind date' nonsense, please. A person is a stranger in the beginning of a relationship. How the heck do you think relationships form? That's what dating is. When you go on a date with someone it's to get to KNOW them. That is the gist of this thread - when is the time right to take it to the next level. If you know someone for years and your families are together all the time like in your example, then it's not really a date in the traditional sense. Start getting real with the premise here, please.
WHEN DID I SAY OUR FAMILIES WERE TOGETEHR ALL THE TIME? Please quote it and repost. I said "our families know each other." You are really stretching the truth and twisting my words just to make a point. You still refuse to answer me. Is every person you've been on a first date a stranger or have you been on a first date with somone you've already known? Ma, u're being unreasonable and unfair. If you're going to say what I said, quote it verbatim...don't paraphrase. Thank you.
Interesting take. I wonder how people thought they knee someone before their douchebag colors came through. I find it weird that you want protrction from somethins that cant really be predicted. Im curious has the wait and see approach yielded you long last relationships in the past?
NEVER MIND! I'll do it pumpkin.... Now how on God's green Earth from that you took "OUR FAMILIES ARE ALWAYS TOGETHER"...or that her an I were anything other than acquaintances in high school, I know not. Can you explain that?
I'm not going to answer a HYPOTHETICAL 30 men in 30 nights, because it's absurd, and didn't happen. Period.
Now you are take issue about how well your families knowing each other or not? How convenient. Yet when you said I 'assumed" you barely knew the woman, you tried to counter it with: "well if you must know Ive known her since high school and our families are tight!" Haha, miss me with the backtrack And yes, EVERY DATE I HAVE BEEN ON, the man was not close to me or a man I had known closely for years. Trust me, if we had that kind of chemistry, it wouldn't take years for us to go on a date. Maybe your macking needs improving
