a *real* black white-supremacist!

It doesn't just happen on the dave chappelle show!

Interesting new york times article (no registration necessary) here:

http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpa...936A15756C0A9659C8B63&sec=health&pagewanted=1

The guy has a white mother & black father... His mom was first a nun, then had him, broke up with the father and became a lesbian.

Better be careful about making those babies, guys! (hey, at least he's not Mariah Carey! :wink: )

---

"...Looking back on the teasing he'd received as a child, he found himself taking the side of his tormentors. ''I began to see the marginalization that I had experienced as a kid as a natural thing,'' he said. ''All forms of life on this planet have an inborn affinity to things that are similar and an aversion to those that are dissimilar.'' He stopped blaming the racists who had antagonized him in his youth. Instead, he blamed his parents, not for being neglectful or cruel but for transgressing against the laws of nature..."

"...Race was a choice; it was what a man feels, and Felton knew he felt white. By defending white culture, he would literally become white -- as pure as anyone else who shared the same beliefs..."

"...This meant that Felton was going to have to keep lying. As he recalled in one letter, ''The pervasive racial materialism in the Movement would require me to give only half of the truth to my comrades as to my own racial biology, but I felt that in the wider sweep of things this would not matter...''

"...'Under such circumstances I saw nothing immoral in my withholding of part of my genealogy from them'...''

"...He was transferred from one prison to another during the last few years of his incarceration and made connections with racists and neo-Nazis in each one. When he was moved to Northern State Prison, outside of Newark, in 2000, he assumed an official leadership position for the first time and created an intricate system of racist education and indoctrination for a selected group of white prisoners...."

 

On April 16, Felton bought a 50-pound bag of ammonium nitrate fertilizer and took it to the apartment in the North End. According to the prosecutor, Felton and Chase were at that point actively engaged in plans to build a bomb.

Whatever plan they had fell apart, however, on April 19, when Chase tried to pass a counterfeit $20 bill at a Dunkin' Donuts in East Boston. The clerk refused to take it and showed it to a police officer who happened to be waiting in line for a doughnut. Chase and Felton were both arrested, and their revolution was suddenly over.

For Felton, though, the real struggle was just beginning. In June 2001, as the prosecutors prepared their case against him, the media broke the news that Felton had one black parent and one white one. It was a delicious story for the Boston papers -- the biracial race terrorist -- but Felton's racial unmasking was his worst nightmare come true. The week the story broke, he tried to commit suicide by slicing his own jugular vein.

"who happened to be waiting in line for a doughnut." lol :mrgreen:

 

After hearing of incidents involving mixed race males and whites together targetting Blacks, I'm not surprised at what I read about that supremacist. There's a movement gaining momentum for them to separate into a different group in this country. I have no problem with this separation, but many of them despise Blacks but are far more favorable towards whites and other ethnic groups who are a closer match to their phenotype. Some of them have discussed how their Black parents are now starting to feel that they hate them because of their desire to form a separate identity. With all the changes occurring in America, I'm starting to wonder how people are going to feel when they realize the role they played in creating a group that just might oppose them as others have done. They have their militants in their ranks, but I'm baffled as to why they target Blacks for considering and accepting them as "Black" when that "rule" was foisted upon us by whites.

Some dark skin Dominicans filed suit against Cablevision two years ago because of job discrimination from light skin Puerto Ricans. Never heard the outcome though. Can that day be far behind when Blacks will find it necessary to do the same against other minorities...even those who descended through us?

http://www.salon.com/mwt/feature/1998/07/24feature.html


SINCE WHEN DID BEING
THE DAUGHTER OF A WASP
AND A BLACK-MEXICAN
BECOME COOL?

BY DANZY SENNA | Strange to wake up and realize you're in style. That's what happened to me just the other morning. It was the first day of the new millennium and I woke up to find that mulattos had taken over. Playing golf, running the airwaves, opening their own restaurants, modeling clothes, starring in musicals with names like "Show Me the Miscegenation!" The radio played a steady stream of Lenny Kravitz, Sade, and Mariah Carey. I thought I'd died and gone to Berkeley. But then I realized. According to the racial zodiac, 2000 is the official Year of the Mulatto. Pure breeds (at least the black ones) are out and hybridity is in. America loves us in all of our half-caste glory. The president announced on Friday that beige is to be the official color of the millennium. Major news magazines announce our arrival as if we were proof of extraterrestrial life. They claim we're going to bring about the end of race as we know it.

It has been building for a while, this mulatto fever. But it was this morning that it really reached its peak. I awoke early to a loud ruckus outside -- horns and drums and flutes playing "Kum ba Yah" outside my window. I went to the porch to witness a mass of bedraggled activists making their way down Main Street. They were chanting, not quite in unison, "Mulattos Unite, Take Back the White!" I had a hard time making out the placards through the tangle of dreadlocks and loose Afros. At the front of the crowd, two brown-skinned women in Birkenstocks carried a banner that read FOR COLORED GIRLS WHO HAVE CONSIDERED JEW BOYS WHEN THE NEGROS AIN'T ENOUGH. A lean yellow girl with her hair in messy Afro-puffs wore a T-shirt with the words JUST HUMAN across the front. What appeared to be a Hasidic Jew walked hand in hand with his girlfriend, a Japanese woman in traditional attire, the two of them wearing huge yellow buttons on their lapels that read MAKE MULATTOS, NOT WAR. I trailed behind the parade for some miles, not quite sure I wanted to join or stay at the heels of this group.

Mulattos may not be new. But the mulatto-pride folks are a new generation. They want their own special category or no categories at all. They're a full-fledged movement, complete with their own share of extremists. As I wandered at the edges of the march this morning, one woman gave me a flyer. It was a treatise on biracial superiority, which began, "Ever wonder why mutts are always smarter than full-breed dogs?" The rest of her treatise was dense and incomprehensible: something about the sun people and the ice people coming together to create the perfectly temperate being. Another man, a militant dressed like Huey P. Newton, came toward me waving a rifle in his hand. He told me that those who refuse to miscegenate should be shot. I steered clear of him, instead burying my head in a newspaper. I opened to the book review section, and at the top of the best-seller list were three memoirs: "Kimchee and Grits," by Kyong Washington, "Gefilte Fish and Ham Hocks," by Schlomo Jackson, and at the top of the list, and for the third week in a row, "Burritos and Borsht," by a cat named Julio Werner. That was it. In a fit of nausea, I took off running for home.

Before all of this radical ambiguity, I was a black girl. I fear even saying this. The political strong arm of the multiracial movement, affectionately known as the Mulatto Nation (just "M.N." for those in the know), decreed just yesterday that those who refuse to comply with orders to embrace their many heritages will be sent on the first plane to Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, where, the M.N.'s minister of defense said, "they might learn the true meaning of mestizo power."

But, with all due respect to the multiracial movement, I cannot tell a lie. I was a black girl. Not your ordinary black girl, if such a thing exists. But rather, a black girl with a Wasp mother and a black-Mexican father, and a face that harkens to Andalusia, not Africa. I was born in 1970, when "black" described a people bonded not by shared complexion or hair texture but by shared history.

Not only was I black (and here I go out on a limb), but I was an enemy of the people. The mulatto people, that is. I sneered at those byproducts of miscegenation who chose to identify as mixed, not black. I thought it wishy-washy, an act of flagrant assimilation, treason, passing even.

It was my parents who made me this way. In Boston circa 1975, mixed wasn't really an option. The words "A fight, a fight, a nigga and a white!" could be heard echoing from schoolyards during recess. You were either white or black. No checking "Other." No halvsies. No in-between. Black people, being the bottom of the social totem pole in Boston, were inevitably the most accepting of difference; they were the only race to come in all colors, and so there I found myself. Sure, I found myself. Sure, I received some strange reactions from all quarters when I called myself black. But black people usually got over their initial surprise and welcomed me into the ranks. It was white folks who grew the most uncomfortable with the dissonance between the face they saw and the race they didn't. Upon learning who I was, they grew paralyzed with fear that they might have "slipped up" in my presence, that is, said something racist, not knowing there was a negro in their midst.

 

Lex, what do you consider yourself? Just wondering!!

 

An observer of my surroundings. Why did you pose this question to me and not the originator of this thread? Do you have a problem with anything I just commented on? Those two exclamation points tell me you're agitated about something...correct me if I'm wrong. BTW I saw your comments on that thread discussing a report on the situation with black males and the conclusions you drew.

 

Lex, I'm not agitated and exclamation points can indicate any kind of emotion. You would have to look at the context in which it was used. It was just a simple question that I pulled out of the ethers.

Anyway that post I made was on point because hollywood just doesn't put out movies for entertainment, it's more like enter "train" ment. All you have to do is sit back and check out the reaction of the masses of the people whenever some controversal article is written or movie or television show is shown and look at the patterns in how they do it.

I know exactly what they are trying to do and why they are doing it and there is a hell of lot more to it than racism, even though that is a major part.

 

Thanks for clearing that up. I actually agree with you on that enter "train" ment concept. But I'm not so sure if it applies to that report. I ran across a very interesting article discussing all this information. Here's a snippet:

It wouldn't surprise me if you can sense the profound changes and shifts occurring as we speak. But I'm waiting for the other shoe to drop.

 

Actually, that's not a new phenomenon and by no means limited to "mixed race" people. There are many so called "pure race" blacks who cooperated tighly with white extremist groups like the KKK and Aryan Nation.


~NOI & KKK~
January 30, 1961: Ku Klux Klan officials met with Nation of Islam leaders,
including Malcolm X and Elijah Muhammad, in Atlanta, Georgia.
February 25, 1962, NOI inviting American Nazi Party (ANP) founder George
Lincoln Rockwell to the Annual Muslim Convention
In 1965, after breaking with the Nation of Islam and denouncing its separatist doctrine, Malcolm X told his followers that NOI under Elijah Muhammad had made agreements with the ANP and the Klan that "were not in the interests of Negros.

~NOI, the black panthers & Metzger~
1985: Metzger attended a Farrahkan rally in Los Angeles
1993: Metzger meeting with Black Panther Militia director and former Milwaukee Alderman Michael McGee
1993: Alliance of Klan faction with a Black separatist group, the Pan-African
Inter-National Movement

Eric Muhammad, Khalid Muhammad, Robert Brock cooperating with the Aryan Nations, KKK factions and former Klan leader and Aryan Nations recruiter Louis Beam, Ku Klux Klan spokesman Robert Weems
February 1, 1992, conference in Los Angeles
"Twelth Annual Revisionist Conference" in September 1994
August 1994 "Jubilation Celebration and Conference"


Yep, and "pure race dark skin" black Robert Brock is probably the most famous one:



Robert L. Brock
Robert L. Brock, (also known as Ben Weintraub), is an African-American anti-Semite, who prominently allies himself with white supremacists.

Brock became a known associate of Daniel Johnson during the 1980s. Johnson, a far-rightist with close ties to many neo-Nazis, advocated (along with Brock) the "Pace Amendment," which declared that only white people of North-European descent should have the rights of permanent U.S. citizenship. People not fitting that description were to be deported in a period of one year.

As a member of both the Liberty Lobby and the right-wing Populist Party (organizations founded by anti-Semite Willis Carto) Brock spoke on radio programs and authored several articles in the weekly Liberty Lobby newspaper The Spotlight, proclaiming his belief in the purity of the races and the desirability of racial segregation.

Sympathizing with the Christian Identity Movement, Brock was invited to speak at the "Jubilation Celebration and Conference" in 1994, along with Louis Beam. In 1988, Brock, dressed in a Ku Klux Klan robe, attended a Christian Identity event hosted by Pete Peters. Brock also takes part as guest speaker at the Annual Gatherings of the German nationalist party Deutsche Volksunion (German People Union), supporters of the W.A.R. (White Aryan Resistance) movement.


Tsk tsk tsk, I'm not surprised at what I read about this "dark skinned pure black" supremacist. I guess there's a movement gaining momentum for them to separate into a different group in this country. :smt025

 

How can he be a 'black supremacist' if he's advocating WHITE supremacy, and NOT 'black supremacy'? :roll:

 

When I see this, I do not see "racism" as so called. I do not think he or they are advocating "supremacy" of any sort, but "segregation." Supremacy implies a dominance, I do not find any claim of a dominant nature or culture. He describes himself as being "white." Then again, I care very little for American politics and history. I do, however, see a claim to separation, "mixed" children 'may' have it harder in terms of defining themselves; it comes as no surprise to me "they" seek to define themselves on their terms. The terms "supremacy" and "segregation" are closely related but are often taken out of context, good writers should know this, but the 'particular' in these "articles" does not know this, or they like to play on the ambiguity of words for an emotional effect. You have to "find the truth, hidden within all the lies" sort of speak.

 

Fair enough, but the tip-off for me was the babble about having all American citizens deported within one year if they are not 'pure blooded Northern European' and so forth, along with the other babble about meeting with white supremacist groups and aligning himself with them, when he isn't even white... :roll:

which also makes me wonder what actually runs through the minds of these said white supremacists, who preach and teach hate and fear (as well as act on it) against blacks, but then accept blacks within their little circle whenever these 'black supremacists' support their agenda.

 

My response wasn't particularly directed at you, but in a general sense.

These so called "supremacists" and "separatists" movements are full of shit.

As I now have read through this article multiple times, each time, ever growing a disfavour for the writer; he draws a conclusion far too quickly about racism. Thus, having a slanted view of "racism in America", you can not draw any other conclusion that this Leo Felton is nothing but a by product of an experimentation gone bad, thus producing a "black racist." The message says, "a black person is only racist if he acts white." But he never truly believed he was either black or white, it is evident, that only pivotal moments in his life decided that factor.

 

That's the beauty of being a supremacist: You don't have to be that smart. :wink:

 

My first thought upon seeing that too.

 

Yes.

Yes.

Or smart at all, obviously, or even moderately intelligent.