Black Genocide

She's not saying that. She is saying they do it in an organized fashion.

 

Ha, criminals are criminals.

I doubt FRWL is saying Russian criminals are better than black ones, that is so not what I got from reading that. If you did then I suggest re-reading it. She's saying that not ALL Russian's shoot black men in the back of the head (although, we now know that dude was Ukrainian). Flaminghetero has a way of stereotyping ya know... and exaggerating.

 

That's exactly what she's saying..

 

Where did you get that from? That's absolute crap. Like LS said, I suggest you re-read what I wrote. If anything, I said that Russians are involved in a lot more serious crime which is in no way 'better.'

 

She got it from reading what you wrote.

 

Flaming and Chi are delusional. You guys read what you want to read. Who was even comparing which criminals are 'better'? Most sane, law abiding people don't compare criminals of different ethnicities to see who is better? Wtf?! CRIMINALS ARE CRIMINALS. I don't care if a paedo is white, black, asian, green... they're all as bad as each other.

The whole convo was about how Flaming speaks out of his ass about things he knows nothing about.

 

Well said. I don't understand how people could be so ignorant as to assume that I would even hint at a nationality/race of one criminal being better than another.
Some people on here just like to argue. And refuse to see other people's opinions/points of view if they don't agree with their own.

I'm done with this thread, I think. If some people want to think that I'm saying that 'Russian criminals are better than Black criminals' then damn, that's just stupid and I'm not even going to bother arguing such a ridiculous point.

 

Yeah, that's right, you're just saying Russian criminals do a "different kind" of crime. One that's more organized, and more about money. Not that petty gang shit Black people do.

You all frequently point out Flaming's tendency to stereotype people. What you are doing is responding with your own stereotypes. And then trying to point out that he stereotypes. That doesn't work. Either you call him out for stereotyping Russian criminals, or you respond by stereotyping Black criminals, but doing both defeats your argument.

You put yourself out there as above that, but you're engaging in it at the same time. That's all I'm saying.

 

I notice that no one called out archangel for being delusional. Were you saying that Russians "do it in an organized fashion"? Because that's my point. "Russian criminals are more organized than Black criminals" is on par with a statement like "Russian criminals are more violent than Black criminals". They're both the same kind of statement.

 

And after that I went on to mention that yes, there are plenty of Russians involved in petty crime also.
Russian Mafia is one of the most powerful crime organisations in the world. They run governments. To compare the Russian Mafia to street crime and gang wars is ridiculous. It's not an opinion and it's not a stereotype, it's fact.
I don't understand why you're trying to defend Black criminals here. Criminals are criminals regardless of race, and murderers are murderers regardless of race or nationality.
Like I said, the Russian Mafia is one of the biggest, if not the biggest in the world right now. So yes, they are more organised and money orientated and even much more dangerous than street gangs in ghettos. How is this disrespectful to black people in any way? I'm really not sure how you're interpreting my posts but you're really taking this all the wrong way.

 

Ha. And you say I'm misreading. Where have I defended Black criminals? I haven't. Thanks.

 

That's nearly word for word what Flaming said.

 

The message I got is that you're quietly trying to accuse me of disrespecting black men just because I said that the Russian criminals that run underworlds all over the world are more organised than ghetto gangs. You completely misinterpreted and twisted what I was trying to say. So I'm just clearing that up, because that wasn't the point that I was making and you know it. Thanks.

 

Flaming also used examples that weren't even true.

 

Because I didn't interpret it like you did.

Where in this quote does she mention black men?

 

You might not have noticed this, but I don't do quiet.

First of all, you've gone from Flaming talking about "Russian Criminals" to some damn Mafia movie, extolling the great power of the Russian mob. Oooh. You're tossing around terms like "ghetto gangs", which, seriously fellow White people, stop saying ghetto.

The point you were trying to make was to defend Russian gangs when Flaming suggested they were worse than Black gangs. Which defeats any chance you have of suggesting that Flame is wrong for comparing the two in the first place. You can't have it both ways. Either Flame is wrong for saying Russian gangs are worse than Black gangs, or Black gangs are worse than Russian gangs, but both are not true. Pick one.

 

Actually, Flame was saying he wouldn't come out alive if he stepped in a Russian ghetto (his words, I guess he can use that word since he's black, right?). And I said that's bullshit, which it is.
Like I said, you're trying to twist my words now, I never once mentioned anything in the manner in which you've accused me of saying it. Re-read my posts. There's absolutely no point in trying to have a discussion or even an argument with someone that can't see anything but their own opinion.

 

Flaming was suggesting that he would be less likely to come out alive than you would be. Then there was this whole little "have you been there? well have you been there?" bit, which should have pointed out to everyone how idiotic the comparing was, but no, it was carried on to suggest that indeed, it was "safer" in one than another. Which is ridiculous. I say this as someone who has lived in many of what you care referring to as ghettos. And I came out healthy wealthy and wise, thanks very much.

Over and over, I point out that by engaging and debating Flaming on the same level, you defeat your ability to suggest that he is debating on the wrong level. If you respond to him the same way he is posting, then claiming he is posting in a way that is unacceptable is an impossible case to make.

Instead of ever responding to that, you just keep responding to what you think I'm quietly saying. And then you accuse me of misreading.

 

That is in fact how it works, yes.

 

OOOHHHH...!!!!!