Feds Says Cannabis Not Medicine While Holding A Patent On It

Discussion in 'Politics' started by VitaminRich, Sep 23, 2014.

  1. VitaminRich

    VitaminRich New Member

    [YOUTUBE]zuX9y0hiqWE[/YOUTUBE]

    Patent #6630507
    http://www.google.com/patents/US6630507

    An interesting comment on the subject:

    The tax paying citizens of the U. S. enjoy a collective ownership
    interest on this patent that needs to be entered into the legal
    defense for patiences in need of the pharmaceutical therapeutic
    benefits of Cannabis.

    Any resistance to this defense by the federal government would
    demonstrate that we are under hostile occupatation of a private
    kleptocracy and not a free public institution.
     
    Last edited: Sep 23, 2014
  2. VitaminRich

    VitaminRich New Member

    https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100429/0214049233.shtml

    Why Does The US Gov't Get To Patent Research Paid For By Public Tax Dollars?​

    An anonymous reader links us to a report from The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), which came out earlier this year, that highlights how, in 2008, the US government brought in $170 million (pdf) by licensing federally (i.e., taxpayer-funded) technology and patents to private companies.

    It details which agencies are getting how many patents, showing that the government appears to get, on average, between 1,000 and 1,500 patents per year. Now, to be clear, I think it's a good thing that the government is looking to move some of these technologies into the private sector, but it does raise questions about why taxpayer funded research gets locked up behind a patent.

    In the US, federal government created works are not allowed to be protected by copyright protections, as people realized that it was ridiculous to lock up content created by their own government.

    Why doesn't the same apply to patents as well? If the goal is really to get the technology out to the private sector, why lock it up and look to license it?

    That makes it more expensive and less accessible. The report highlights how the government has been ramping up these efforts, such that it grew "revenues" from this licensing program by 46% from 2004 to 2008.

    This is one situation where it seems like a profit-motive might be quite misplaced.
     
  3. VitaminRich

    VitaminRich New Member

  4. The Dark King

    The Dark King Well-Known Member

    THIS JUST IN


    WATER IS WET
     

Share This Page