I'D LIKE TO APOLOGIZE to some here about...

a vermin scumbag I once felt sorry for in NYC....

This is not politics asshole, this is about the slaughter of innocent children.


So I will take all offerings...plates of crow, pops on my head (don't hurt me), smacks on my bum,
boots to my rear...

 

Holy shit a woman admitting she was wrong. Someone alert the media lol.

Seriously shit like that makes me sick. How is it even allowed.

 

He's a bottom feeder. No one should feel sorry for him when he gets what he deserves.

 

FYI, I have apologized 2 times to you in arguments.
Any idea how hard they were to type and you don't even remember!

 

He is a scumbag and so are most of the people commenting on that site - OMG - The uninformed nonsense and pure lies some posted was as disgusting.

 

You're too cute sometimes kid lol

 

I was just reading that...that Norway is anti-semetic.. uh..it is???

Though the chick from Israel and her thoughts on the why Arabic assimilation has failed in Europe...I found that read interesting.

 

Not only that, but that the kids were brainwashed w antisemitic ideas at that camp. That "darkies" was not attending but were servants to attend to the kids and that they went to private school to avoid "darkies".

First of all, if you are concerned about equality, why would you use the word "darkies", poorly veiled "concern", bunch of racists - something the camp was working on eliminating.
Second of all, servants, private school - Norway? LOL.

 

Kids were slaughtered. Its NOT what politics is ABOUT! Even if they were training to become the future labor party, they were harming NO ONE!

In a different and worse case example, there are schools all over the Middle East teach/indoctrinate kids to hate America (some even mentally brainwash them to be future Jihadists), but to go in and slay them all would be abominable - kid's don't understand when they are pawns.

 

The "whys" don't matter when the end result is a political terrorist executed as many as he could. because no parent in the world would entertain that sending their kids/teens to a labor camp might = death as the "punishment". I doubt they were "made to" send them, either. Maybe the kids were made to go by their parents, fine...but Norway is not a dictatorship.

Beck obviously missed the huge crater in the road he was going down.

 

It's really not all that different from allowing certain political groups to be part of a university or a better example would be that it's no different from people being sent to a camp to fix up their attitudes.

The organization in question is a progressive institution that basically wants to educate and teach the future leaders how to be more accepting and open in an ever growing multicultural society. It's heavily beneficial because should someone like yourself were to venture into that country, would you rather...

A) ...be welcome in opened arms and recognized as a person?
B) ...come to a country with uneasy feelings because the youth prefers a nationalist pride?
C) ... unbridled hostility the minute your shadow set foot on their land for tourism, business, etc..?

In any country, education is key. There are multiple tiers of education ranging from sociopolitical, economic, and other education means to foster a better nation. The strength of a nation comes in the form of togetherness while exercising practical measures of life. And socially, it helps.

 

Really??!! Your have listened a bit to much to what he said and too little to common sense.

Why do you think the parenmts were being made to send their kids anywhere????

These parents are not being made to send their kids - neither are these kids being made to go. They were in their upper teens and wanted to go. Scandinavian culture is such that in the upper teens, your parents don't make you do anything (other than the musts).

Also, being politically active in your youth is super-common in Scandinavia. All parties have "youth-parties" and they engage in these type of things - all parties do and like I said - being politically active very young is withing cultural context in Scandivania. The upper teens vent voluntary - they want to go, they want to be engaged in politics.

Also, what do you mean with "something like this"... It was a camp, a political one (see above) and it was teaching multicultural acceptance etc. What is wrong with that.

You make the mistake to forget that Norway is not USA - its a different culture and political camps a super common and nobody MADE anyone go to anything - that was just a weird comment. You really think the Labor party made the parents send their kids???? Or even that the parents made their kids go??? Serial???? SMDH.

You show complete lack of understanding of the Scandinavian culture - which is fine, I don't expect you to know. However, you put it into American context, which I would have expected you to be smart enough to not do.
Edit: this wasn't a camp that the government put on to indoctrinate youth - these camps are put on by all parties, all of them. I am actually a bit floored by the many assumptions you made.

 

Now Beck says the shooter was right in questioning youth camps. Guess he forgot his own association to 9/12 camps

http://blogs.suntimes.com/eber?t/politics/-beck-not-only-comp?ared.html

 

Link is broken.

 

Try this one:

http://blogs.suntimes.com/ebert/politics/-beck-not-only-compared.html

 

And common decency.

 

Son of a...not surprised. Not to mention...he's a narrow-minded magic underwear wearing lunatic.

 

Btw - I think its disgusting that what the teens did there and why is even up for discussion. Its neither here, nor there. It has nada to do with how they were senselessly slaughtered. Beck should have stayed on topic and not sidetrack it or question the victims reason to be there. wdf? That was just a horrible choice.
If Beck sent his kids to a religious camp (which btw isn't any different than a political one) and someone did the same thing there. He would have had a fit if someone questioned why and what his kids was doing at the camp. Guaranteed.

 

if it was his kids then it would be totally different. what an asshole

 

I understood that you didn't agree w the shooter but don't you see what questioning the camp does to the victims and their families?

It's an attempt to minimalize the event (regardless if intended or not), like they partly have themselves to blame. Does their activities somehow make the fact that they were assassinated more acceptable?

He also really completely didn't understand the cultural context as I described in my rant above.
By not understanding the cultural context, he really made it into something very ugly and went to a place/comparison that is not only undeserved but also something that is probably the worst comparison you can ever do. Its terribly insulting.
Worst is that he, by doing that is spreading rumors to dimwits that believe what he say is true and now we will have people walking around thinking... ah, never mind.