In Spite!

I am reposing, this because it will get deleted in the other forum.


This is all due to the fact a few women here can not handle their arguments begin challenged with such aggression and frostily, they should come to expect if you make a bold assumption in particular of BM, as a rule of thumb, their will be certain biases in their discourse. But these women never argue for a position of knowledge to combat their assertions and shaming language ensue. This doesn't make them any higher above reproach and this section WAS ONLY made to censor and to spite BM in particular, for the sake of balance and equality when there isn't even an imbalance. Maybe we should advocate a section where BM can police around WW. Since I know most of the posters here are American by their constitutional laws we have that right http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Constitution#First_Amendment
By the first, second and ninth Amendments we have that right.

This comment will be edited out or deleted all together because well, it precedes basic logic of all things and the words are hurtful to the fragile feelings.

 

This is my response that I posted from the female area.

mosiah and seven, please go back and read that both Silvercosma and myself felt the name was also inappropriate. But we did think that a place where people could air their grievances and not get censored would be a nice addition to the board.

I was as surprised by this separation as you were, and I don't blame you for being upset. Even if the new section remains, maybe we could get it renamed the 'gripe corner' or something. (I know that probably sounds dumb, but you get the general idea.)

Please don't go away in a huff about this. I did originally post this in the 'conversations' area, but I guess the webmaster decided it was to inflammatory or something.

 

I also see that you are taking pop shots at me in other topics, and you are better than most how exactly!? I guess you got exactly what you wanted by provoking me into a direct post to you. Of course, you resort straight to the attacks but combat not a thing at me, just indirectly with frivolous subliminal messages. I am flattered that I can leave an impeccable first impression and that you admire me so; I am also amazed that one can have such an impact on one person who I never made a direct post to.

Spew hate about me and take sniper shots at the man, it's nothing new; but, if I were to start personal attacks at you, do not go cry to the webmaster to have me censored or beg to leave. It is only foolish for you to believe, that any discussion that I partake in, I am in the mist to toss about my intellectual willy. No, I am only in it to provoke discussion about the real issue, seemingly, the issues that most white women do not want to take about. Besides, I do not read much of Aristotle and Webster is not the founder of English diction; in fact, I never use Webster's diction to give any definitive meanings. I guarantee, your only argument against be will be how wrong I am about numerous topic, but you will combat not a thing BUT MY CHARACTER on these topics or dissect my arguments as illogical.

 

...
...

Damn...

Passive-aggressiveness never seems to go out of style....

 

Talk about putting the nail in the coffin, 7.

 

That was really impressive, 7.