Ladies, just how masculine do you like your men?

This question can cause some confusion so lemme explain.

A lot of cute white chicks I know like brothas who are really muscular... really really muscular. They tend to like characteristics more associated with the "alpha" males (deep voice, tall etc.).

How much stock do you girls put in this?

I mean, how "masculine" does your man have to be?

For example, does the sight of someone like Ronnie Coleman (http://www.ronniecoleman.net/kingcoleman2.jpg) turn you on at all?

If not, then exactly how "macho" does your fella have to be?

I've often heard that WW are attracted to BM because they find them more masculine than WM, or "more of a man". Do you find this to be true? In your case, do you feel that BM are just more rugged/manly than WM?

 

No it's not true, both BM and WM can be built and sexy, or not, when am I going to stop reading this nonsense on this damn board.

 

How can you say it's not true when I've heard this from white girls myself? It's just people have their preference. Every girl is different. But that part does make certain girls attracted to guys.

 

muscles?

ok, the whole muscle thang doesn't do it for me... on 'face value' I start to worry that maybe ALL his energy is put in at the gym for a body beautiful, rather than other parts of his personality.

I like muscle definition and body tone = healthy. Cooking skills impress me more than bulging biceps etc. I'm not joking.

The one thing I do insist on bodywise is no belly - I don't have one and I don't want my guy to have one either.

 

I prefer taller men, but i'm only four feet eleven inches, so guys who are considered short can be tall to me. :lol: 5-8" is my cut-off height, anything below that is too short, though. But I find men with muscles usually have a very high opinion of themselves, so I'm not too picky as far as build goes.