Bliss
Well-Known Member
Lol. That's what l did when l saw his crayola scribble pen. :smt037 He missed so many though. :smt086
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Lol. That's what l did when l saw his crayola scribble pen. :smt037 He missed so many though. :smt086
How on earth did you become a teacher again, seriously?
Nope, the thread was thug govt cops which I replied to you in. SMH, calm down and stop being so emotional. I felt our discussion would be better discussed in another thread and I also did not want to give that weirdo who gets off on dividing people satisfaction of keeping that thread alive.
You sitting here being coonish laughing at her lame attempts of humor while she shits on you behind your back but tap on if that's what makes you feel good.
I don't think that will happen. We all saw what we saw. Same thing that he/she cop did. No excuse.
The victim's lawyer said yesterday he is already in talks with the police and city, and they are close to a monetary deal for his client. I hope he gets to enjoy the rest of his life in peace..i'm sure he is still in shock over it.
Lets keep it 100...you went to another thread and did fuck boy shit .How on earth did you become a teacher again, seriously?
Nope, the thread was thug govt cops which I replied to you in. SMH, calm down and stop being so emotional. I felt our discussion would be better discussed in another thread and I also did not want to give that weirdo who gets off on dividing people satisfaction of keeping that thread alive.
You sitting here being coonish laughing at her lame attempts of humor while she shits on you behind your back but tap on if that's what makes you feel good.
So you are saying that " no one should be killed " is off?
Really?
What's to be discussed ?
You are OK with killing?
You wanted to go Nat Turner but you comparing apples oranges... Dumbass
So you are saying that " no one should be killed " is off?
Really?
What's to be discussed ?
You are OK with killing?
You wanted to go Nat Turner but you comparing apples oranges... Dumbass
The monetary deal, if any, is about limiting civil liability, but doesn't ensure the officer faces justice. The "reasonable person" standard is a loophole big enough to drive a truck through.
Lets keep it 100...you went to another thread and did fuck boy shit .
Smh
A lot of the people down here doing dumb shit are New Yorkers.
No it doesn't. In South Carolina it did at least.
The reasonable person standard will come to the officer's aid when the trial gets underway this autumn.
Discuss this with me in the thug govt cops thread.
Anyway, I'm done with elementary bickering in this thread and apologize for calling you out of your name putting you down. I'm not going to allow this injustice to everyone get derailed. Anything being discussed other than this latest social injustice will be ignored.
Officer Was Aiming For the Autistic Man, Shot His Unarmed Black Therapist By Accident, Says Miami Police Union Chief
The Florida cop who shot an unarmed therapist on the street was actually aiming for the man’s autistic patient, a union official said Wednesday.
The North Miami police officer thought Charles Kinsey — who was lying on his back with his arms in the air — was in danger, his union chief said.
The officer meant to hit the autistic man Kinsey was trying to help — and he fired three times, according to North Miami police.
But he missed the patient, and hit Kinsey instead, the union chief explained. The cop feared the confused autistic patient — holding a toy truck as he sat next to Kinsey on the pavement — might have posed a safety threat, the labor leader said.
AH HA, this makes it soooooo much better! The police officer aim with a assault rifle was so terrible that he couldn't hit a big ass 230lbs plus sitting duck 3 times.
The one running shot in the back is in Oct.I will sit and watch but I must confess. I don't know which trial.
is it the one where the officer shot the man running in the back or the one where the police officer shot a man for retrieving his wallet?
The one running shot in the back is in Oct.
The wallet guy Trooper already plead guilty and sentencing is soon. Up to 20 years.
I see he was not charged for attempted murder after attempting to murder someone!!!! [sarcasm] Clearly, it was the right thing.[/sarcasm]
up to 20 years... not minimum 10 years but up to which can fall into a day or a month or even a year...
ahh the justice system.
Maybe he will get more than if someone were to rape a woman behind a dumpters 3 years maybe.....
I mean, literally, a guy got sentenced to 50 years for selling drugs but you try to kill someone up to 20 years... What a system. It is full of sh...
Who got 50 years for selling drugs?
Who got 50 years for selling drugs?
The monetary deal, if any, is about limiting civil liability, but doesn't ensure the officer faces justice. The "reasonable person" standard is a loophole big enough to drive a truck through.
There is a guy I personally know that got 120 years for dope. It's since been reduced to 60. I think the judge was being a hard ass and trying to make a point.
I will sit and watch but I must confess. I don't know which trial.
is it the one where the officer shot the man running in the back or the one where the police officer shot a man for retrieving his wallet?