Once again you are missing the point GL, I know it's anecdotal, but most doctors and lawyers I know do not have God complexes. They are happy to have a dialogue with their clients/patients. What Raider is speaking to is for example when the client comes to her complaining of foot pain and is insisting the root cause must be something completely unrelated like the color of their nail polish, or a client comes to me stating that the murder he just committed was justifiable because he did not like the color of his victims shirt. Doctor's and lawyers go through a lot of schooling, testing, and experience which makes them FAR more likely to understand the issues at hand A LOT better than laypersons who dont have all of those factors, it does not mean they are always right, or that they dont want any input from their clients, often times client input can be quite valuable. That being said when I see people here making legal claims or speculation that is just flat out false (in this case some saying that the football player had no legal liability for his actions), for the benefit of those who might be reading, I do give very general education regarding that issue where I lay out the possible legal realities. I have seen Raider do the same when it comes to medical issues.
So it is not nearly as simple as "not wanting other people to have differing opinions", most people, including Raider (if I can speak for her), enjoy a good debate, differing opinions and facts that can lead a person to reevaluate their own opinions. However that does not negate the reality that there are such things as "facts" and "reality" and when someone states an opinion that runs contrary to facts in a persons given field one would be wise to listen rather than deny/ignore those facts.