Do agree with you there, in Aus and Europe the accused's identity is protected even after charges. However, being famous, l assume it would make that difficult to keep under wraps.
At your bolded, even if Jamie is guilty of it, of course he is going to deny it, period, (who wouldn't?), and filing counter-charges isn't a bad idea, considering she can never prove it.
How would a woman prove years ago she's at some party(?), or at Jamie's house and that he apporached her while she's sitting (whether flirting with him, or whatever, or not), and he pulls out his fick and tries to make her suck it. When she declines, he then slaps her cheek with it. I could totally see it going down like that. Lots of athletes and Hollywood producers/actors/stars think their shit (dicks) don't stink, lol, smh.
Jamie has often loved showing off his dick and talking about it, because he's well endowed. You should listen to him yapping about it on Howard Stern.
He also admitted he did take the pic and uploaded it (that was on GuysWithIPhones) as "preparation for a movie role, to show a female friend how he looked". Lol.
I think
if he did it back then, Jamie is a comedian and probably thought he was being funny, when in fact he was being an asshole and it would have humiliated the woman. Jamie probably thought he was Raw's 'dick-swinging "Dexter Jock" from the Bahamas', lol!