'The Blowjob Paper... Blowjob AI

Beasty said:
A robot in the likeness of Scar Jo would definitely have to be custom made to avoid a lawsuit. I could imagine pornstars "licensing" manufacturers to make robots in their likeness. That may be a come up for the most desired ones.
Click to expand...
I was reading about inorganic materials and how it could be used to mimic body muscles on an android. I’ll see if I can find the article.
 
Women say they want male sex robots strictly out of spite. The reality is robots don't argue, won't fight, won't engage in drama and emotional games, and won't pay for shit. No passionate make-up sex, sorry. He's not really listening to you talk about your cat. Your robot doesn't care. A binary computer brain cannot keep up with chaotic female whims. Women need all this more than sex.

On the male side, if the female sex bots can be programmed to cook, it's a wrap.
 
RicardoCooper said:
Women say they want male sex robots strictly out of spite. The reality is robots don't argue, won't fight, won't engage in drama and emotional games, and won't pay for shit. No passionate make-up sex, sorry. He's not really listening to you talk about your cat. Your robot doesn't care. A binary computer brain cannot keep up with chaotic female whims. Women need all this more than sex.

On the male side, if the female sex bots can be programmed to cook, it's a wrap.
Click to expand...
Based on machine learning and algorithms, a sex bit will talk to you about your favorite sports/teams, should be able to do laundry, fold clothes, and iron clothes. Not to mention cook and clean. It is really just a “maid bot” that you can have sex with.

I suppose it is just a drama free situation with zero fears of STDs/STIs, #metoo, or being manipulated in to buying things you don’t need or want. So, it really depends on the marketing. As far as genders, a lot of older women prefer companionship without the drama. So, this may be right up their alley. As far as 20somethings that date based on Instagram followers, or those in their early 30s, it may not be a desirable situation.
 
RicardoCooper said:
Women say they want male sex robots strictly out of spite. The reality is robots don't argue, won't fight, won't engage in drama and emotional games, and won't pay for shit. No passionate make-up sex, sorry. He's not really listening to you talk about your cat. Your robot doesn't care. A binary computer brain cannot keep up with chaotic female whims. Women need all this more than sex.

On the male side, if the female sex bots can be programmed to cook, it's a wrap.
Click to expand...
Well guess what. Male sex robots are already here. I'm apparently one of them. lol
 
p16812713_b_v8_aa.jpg



https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Better_than_Us

It’s like the BBC/AMC show (that was a version of another show), about androids in Society. The British one is on amazon prime. I like that each country focuses on a different aspect of it. This Russian version is on Netflix and focuses on the issues some people have about sex robots. The british one has to deal with automation taking jobs.
 
meowkittenmeow said:
A WW could question the motives of anyone, any woman or man can. But the word “equally” doesn’t apply here as WW have oppressive power.

And as TDK pointed out, the key is finding an individual as oppose to someone who is a member of the herd. Which is much harder to find these days.
Click to expand...
I do not see myself as having opressive power.
If that was true, we WW, would not be looking for equality and respect.
Indeed one could sometimes say that WW, among all women, are the most abused by society ~
pornography etc.
 
sarah23 said:
I do not see myself as having opressive power.
If that was true, we WW, would not be looking for equality and respect.
Indeed one could sometimes say that WW, among all women, are the most abused by society ~
pornography etc.
Click to expand...
White men do not see themselves as having oppressive power either.

And to be clear, are you implying that white women are “the most abused by society”?

Or are you implying that white women “in your country” are “the most abused by society”?

In addition to that, you reference pornography as your reasoning for your statement. Pornography does have a very abusive, racist, misognystic, and misandrist culture. It is known for objectifying men and women of all races and backgrounds. It has been known to imply that white women are sluts, that black women are whores, and that black men are sex crazed and willing to fuck anything.

With that in mind, after making a stereotype that is in line with pornography’s depiction of black men, as well as the history of oppression of black men by both white men and white women, and the usage of “black man=sex crazed” to justify lynchings, killings, false allegations towards black men, do you feel that you are in a position to argue that you:

1. Do not have oppressive power after implying that black men are sex crazed?

2. Do not have oppressive power due to pornographic images and the impressions that it portrays, in spite of the fact that you portrayed black men in the same way in your joke, previously?
 
Last edited:
meowkittenmeow said:
We can’t expect white men and women to give up their position and power. So, the few who don’t support those systems (and if we are factoring in the entire population, it is very few), may hope for a better future, but we will have to wait until long after we are dead to see those systems destroyed.
Click to expand...
meowkittenmeow said:
White supremacy benefits most white women in the long term, and it has been doing so for quite some time. It doesn’t benefit women who are open to different things, or that buck against tradition, but for the vast majority, it is and always has been beneficial. More specifically white women who know how to use the system to their benefit.

I do agree that it is mostly a “white guy thing”, but it is only a “white guy thing” to white women, who are in a position to oppress black men and always have been. As I have stated previously, we generally endure under the oppression of the white male patriarchy, white female matriarchy, and the black female matriarchy. Essentially a trifecta of oppression.

I do, however, understand that if you are against that sort of thing, personally, it can be quite difficult to see the many avenues in which you benefit from said systems. It’s been discussed ad nauseam, so, I will leave it at that.

In regards to representation, we are probably a solid 100 plus years away from things being halfway decent.
Click to expand...
I guess it is normal that those who benefit, white people, do not see it as being supremacy.
I mean, as opposed to those who are discriminated.
And those incidents where WW have
used /abused power, like calling the police, are not helping us.
Maybe more WW need to stand up and condemn these women.
 
T
sarah23 said:
I guess it is normal that those who benefit, white people, do not see it as being supremacy.
I mean, as opposed to those who are discriminated.
And those incidents where WW have
used /abused power, like calling the police, are not helping us.
Maybe more WW need to stand up and condemn these women.
Click to expand...
Hope so in the future.
 
sarah23 said:
I guess it is normal that those who benefit, white people, do not see it as being supremacy.
I mean, as opposed to those who are discriminated.
And those incidents where WW have
used /abused power, like calling the police, are not helping us.
Maybe more WW need to stand up and condemn these women.
Click to expand...
Absolutely! We kinda have to be the most vocal people condemning that kind of behavior
 
GAmomlisa said:
Absolutely! We kinda have to be the most vocal people condemning that kind of behavior
Click to expand...
Its better if we as WW, are seen to distance ourselves from such behaviour. And to be seen to be supporting BM who are the victims of white priviledge.
 
andreboba said:
You should always take a step back when someone casually generalizes group behavior.
Most guys can only dream of being able to manipulate a woman's behavior.
Click to expand...
I agree with the group behaviour part.

However, manipulation becomes much easier once she is emotionally very attached to someone. There are some men who purposely play perfect gentleman until they are in a committed relationship/marriage and then they make a 180degree turn in their behaviour. Men from some cultures seem to do this more than others, as Sarah mentioned. That’s not to say that they are all bad.
 
GAmomlisa said:
No, you're right. Just a related thing. Also seems to be a phenom that is effecting white guys more than men of color. Not sure why that is, but it seems to be the case
Click to expand...
Maybe they are missing the days when they were the king of the hill. Times change and we all need to adapt or be increasingly left out. world re
 
meowkittenmeow said:
I agree, but this stuff is super amusing. I will admit, with the rise of STDs and STIs due to things like tinder and so on, I am hopeful that they will come up with something better. In the next 10 years, the only people without an STD are going to be me and a few of the brothas in this forum and Amish women. I guess we are going to have to learn to speak Dutch.
Click to expand...
Amish? If they look that actress in the Harrison Ford movie based in a Amish community then I am all for it. Btw, I think their original language is German
 
Madeleine said:
I agree with the group behaviour part.

However, manipulation becomes much easier once she is emotionally very attached to someone. There are some men who purposely play perfect gentleman until they are in a committed relationship/marriage and then they make a 180degree turn in their behaviour. Men from some cultures seem to do this more than others, as Sarah mentioned. That’s not to say that they are all bad.
Click to expand...
I would say both men and women practice manipulation. To be clear, some men and some women and not all men and all women.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom