Tony Soprano
Moderator
Wow.Your man card is temporarily suspended until further notice.
But believe it or not if there was a "chick-flick" disguised as a sports movie, the first that would come to mind is none other than:
"Jerry Maguire".
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Wow.Your man card is temporarily suspended until further notice.
Your man card is temporarily suspended until further notice.
Cold blooded.Maybe because that's the way the movie has been advertised. The way the commercials have had it is a woman (ww) who just happens to be "obsessed" with a man (bm) she works with. But of course there are no race elements written in because they want the scenario to be relateable to the audience.
Certainly not. But it would have been categorized as "black movie" which usually do not generate the same amount of cash. Now that I think of it, there are only three black characters in the film and the rest of the support cast is white. So I am guessing the decision to have a psycho/stalker was based on the demographics and their attempt to reach a broader audience.I mean really, would the effectiveness of Beyonce's character been lessened had the obsessed woman been another black woman???
I don't think so. And that's really the whole argument for more. Race is the quiet little factor in the room because this type of movie caters to those fears that alot of black women out there have about bm/ww couples and flings where the ww seems to have no disregard for the man's family or happy relationship with a sistah.
Now maybe the writers tried there damndest to not put race at the forefront, but c'mon folks, let's not forget what country we live in.
Yeah...., because she's a good actress and I am a fan of hers. That part probably no one will dispute. But may your theater audience speaks my argument better. You said nothing by white women there mostly. Well....women will probably recognize with the "fatal attraction" theme of this movie in an emotional way. And of course will back Beyonce's character as Ali's was protrayed as a crazed homewrecker. I just find it disturbing that hollyweird must continue to prey upon women's insecurities about relationships in order to get them into the theaters.
Certainly not. But it would have been categorized as "black movie" which usually do not generate the same amount of cash. Now that I think of it, there are only three black characters in the film and the rest of the support cast is white. So I am guessing the decision to have a psycho/stalker was based on the demographics and their attempt to reach a broader audience.
Again, you're presuming that the audience, even a black audience, isn't progressive or intelligent enough to understand the premise of the movie. Actually, I would think a black audience would recognize with it more as it were mainly black people acting out the scenario. Plus, black women are in a better position these days to argue whether or not they are being stereotyped or victimized in a movie. We blacks in general are in a better place to fight those stereotypes now. I think if we are bothered by this type of scenario, we've got a lot worse problems to deal with.And I am quite sure that if they had cast a black woman as the lead for the stalker/psycho girl, many people would have complained that it was a negative Stereotype of black women etc.
No, maybe black women don't. And the truth is, more often, I don't either. It would be nice to see a brotha in a movie with a beautiful sistah more often, but it has been generally known that Hollywood's audience does not like that. Imagine that. White america is always up in arms about IR dating, especially on film. But when that town tries to put a solid black couple on, they don't want to see that either. Maybe because it doesn't conform to THEIR stereotype of black relationships. And remember, we blacks are obsessed with race because whites decided it to be that way. See Slavery...it should be noted that we live in a country where alot of black folks are obsessed with race too. It's not like many black American women want to see a handsome and successfull black man in a romantic movie with a white woman.
Well yeah, they rooted for her because of Ali's convincing acting probably. But again, the scenario was set whereby women could relate to it from a wife or girlfriend's perspective. And there's nothing wrong with that. All I was reiterating was that it seems like another Hollywood stereotypical IR-themed movie which quitely plays on black women's insecurities. I've been watching movies for years and I don't doubt that a minority female could have produced the same affect. This to me was that town's position on how IR is to be for bm and ww... I think they just rooted for Beyonce because Ali Larter did such a great job of being the villain that it became a old good and evil cliche movie when you cheer for the good guy. Ali Larter's acting is very good because it's not over the top and nuanced. I am thinking that there's one key scene that made the female audience identify with Beyonce's character, but I will not ruin it for you if you haven't seen the movie yet.
Writers and filmakers are good at creating sympathy and empathy for their characters. Rocky I and II in the early 80's played in all movie theaters across sub-saharan African countries, so how would you explains millions of black Africans rooting for a white guy to kick a brother's ass?I hope you get my point.
You're joking right??? I mean, do you or anybody with a sense of tv or racial history, really need to know that Hollywood will do an IR story between a white man and black woman? They're in that transitionary mode with respect to IR relationships in that town. Probably the fact that this is about the most liberal this american audience will be to such a relationship that they are doing it at all. But just a quick Star Trek history lesson.
In a few short years, there will be genetic cloning. There will be an uprising and world war III. Countries are in shambles and populations scattered. In north america in 2063, a man creates a warp ship and ushers in a new era thus creating the Federation a few years later. James Kirk, who was born in Iowa (yes, still have states in the future), doesn't come along for like another 100 years or so give or take. Thus, this story in the movie is a while from now in our history. Why the short lesson folks?? Because, I've been watching S.T. for years and it has always been about the future. And this like racial prejudice, poverty, war,...all those things should be less of an issue after a few hundred years. But every movie showing ANY relationship generally involves a white male with a white or minority female. Not often, like in most movies, do you see a brotha with any real relationship, much less IR. Typical Hollywood. I guess my question is in James Kirk's era, the 22th century(??), where are all the white women for him to woo over??? It's just such a narrow view for an industry which is attempting to push it's own quiet IR agenda.
Cold blooded.
First of all, no offense, but do you have the statistical numbers on that???
Again, you're presuming that the audience, even a black audience, isn't progressive or intelligent enough to understand the premise of the movie.
No, maybe black women don't. And the truth is, more often, I don't either. It would be nice to see a brotha in a movie with a beautiful sistah more often, but it has been generally known that Hollywood's audience does not like that.
Imagine that. White america is always up in arms about IR dating, especially on film.
And remember, we blacks are obsessed with race because whites decided it to be that way. See Slavery.
As for those Rocky movies, that was mostly an underdog story. Hell, I'm a black man and even I was rooting for Rock to win in the end. It was about persevering under the most difficult of circumstances. To be cliche, it was about overcoming adversity in order to achieve your goals. Now without ever stepping foot on the African continent, I would presume that those people probably saw something similar. And we must take into the fact that their racial history and experiences with whites would probably be a little different than ours, if you get MY point.:smt023
Anybody seen it yet???
First of all, no offense, but do you have the statistical numbers on that??? That's purely subjective, based upon overall ticket sales at the box office around the country and abroad. I could argue that various "white-themed" movies don't sell quite as much for the same race reason. But I do feel as though past racial prejudices have contributed to what is considered a "black" movie. And the argument about demographics with respect to Ali's character doesn't hold water for me 'cause it presumes that a larger non-black audience cannot fathom a minority female succeeding in that role. Whose to say that under those circumstances, a black female working at that place wouldn't take the risk of acting out in the same way??
Again, you're presuming that the audience, even a black audience, isn't progressive or intelligent enough to understand the premise of the movie. Actually, I would think a black audience would recognize with it more as it were mainly black people acting out the scenario. Plus, black women are in a better position these days to argue whether or not they are being stereotyped or victimized in a movie. We blacks in general are in a better place to fight those stereotypes now. I think if we are bothered by this type of scenario, we've got a lot worse problems to deal with.
No, maybe black women don't. And the truth is, more often, I don't either. It would be nice to see a brotha in a movie with a beautiful sistah more often, but it has been generally known that Hollywood's audience does not like that. Imagine that. White america is always up in arms about IR dating, especially on film. But when that town tries to put a solid black couple on, they don't want to see that either. Maybe because it doesn't conform to THEIR stereotype of black relationships. And remember, we blacks are obsessed with race because whites decided it to be that way. See Slavery.
Well yeah, they rooted for her because of Ali's convincing acting probably. But again, the scenario was set whereby women could relate to it from a wife or girlfriend's perspective. And there's nothing wrong with that. All I was reiterating was that it seems like another Hollywood stereotypical IR-themed movie which quitely plays on black women's insecurities. I've been watching movies for years and I don't doubt that a minority female could have produced the same affect. This to me was that town's position on how IR is to be for bm and ww.
As for those Rocky movies, that was mostly an underdog story. Hell, I'm a black man and even I was rooting for Rock to win in the end. It was about persevering under the most difficult of circumstances. To be cliche, it was about overcoming adversity in order to achieve your goals. Now without ever stepping foot on the African continent, I would presume that those people probably saw something similar. And we must take into the fact that their racial history and experiences with whites would probably be a little different than ours, if you get MY point.:smt023
AAAAHHHHHHHHHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHHAHAA!!!!!!!
For some reason I wanna see the deleted scenes more than I do the movie itself.
I wonder exactly what was too risque for the film that eventually ended up on the cutting room floor.
No, my problem today is why is that still a practice in Hollywood today??? Sure, there are plenty of whites out there who don't like IR. But alot of people now generally don't even care. But that town still uses the same formula and rules from the 1950s with respect to race and relationships. Ya'll notice no one really cries hard when it's a wm/bw couple. But everyone cries that it's promoting IR dating when it's a bm/ww couple. Stupid. Hollywood should just do it and stop with all the dumb race stuff. It's just insulting at this point. Really, it is. There are plenty of white and black actors in Hollywood to spare to do some IR where people can accept it. I just think it's a little racist that white people sitting in a room in Hollywood get to decide what race is and what it's supposed to look like. That's the main reason why I don't go to the movies ANYMORE.
Well, no offense too, but how come you highlighted my statement and missed the fact that I wrote "I am guessing"?Isn't it clear that it was purely speculative? And I based that specualtion from Spike Lee interview, some other articles that said even a movie with black stars like Dreamsgirls would do a decent amount of cash here in North America, but not well at all over see. There are many examples like these.
Again, your are correct. I guess I should have added that I don't understand necessarily why a "black movie" must not do well AT ALL. It shouldn't matter. The theme of the movie has to be the main attraction, as well as the acting ability of the characters themselves. And before you say, yes I'll eat my own medicine and state that I understand this countries history of not believing that blacks are truly capable of good acting and thus movies where we are a large cast aren't worth watching. Well, Sidney Poiter proved that wrong. All I mean is must we continue that idea just for a movie to make money or must, at some point, we try to tell stories from a perspective coincidentally having a large black cast?Aren't you agreeing with my initial statement here? Will Smith said that the decision from studios and producers not to cast a black woman as his love interest in Hitch was partly based on the fact that Romantic comedies with two black lead do not do well here in the US and oversea. So I just told you I was guessing that they didn't cast a black women in the role of the psycho/stalker to avoid the "black movie" label and here you are saying that it has been known that Hollywood's audience does not like that.
Let's table that for another day, please, 'cause this response is already gettin' way tooo long for me playa.What about us continental Africans? Didn't we have colonialism? .....
Actually, one Spike Lee interview that I saw show where he explained that the IR relationship wasn't supposed to be the central theme of that movie at first. He said he actually wanted to talk about various issues which existed in the black community (the family structure, blacks struggling in the workplace, a black man's committment to his community, etc...) It just so happened that it was interpreted in a different way. Of course, the writing may have had some influence in that like alot of his movies have been. But yeah, you're abso-mundo right that many whites that I've run into are completely ignorant about black culture. That to me has to do with this countries racial history and specific segregation rules. Let's face it, Chicago, for example, didn't just develop a "south side" with a large black population overnight.....It was Spike Lee who made Jungle Fever and tried to portray IR as negative. Many white AMeircans are totally ignorant on Black American culture and mentality and they would think that Spike Lee's view represent the overall view and sentiment of the black community. ...
hahaha some of the posts in the thread, which I have nor will not read, are probably longer than the script of the film.
Good for Beyonce, she is probably the biggest female star in the world right now. Fuck all of the other considerations.
hahaha some of the posts in the thread, which I have nor will not read, are probably longer than the script of the film.
Good for Beyonce, she is probably the biggest female star in the world right now. Fuck all of the other considerations.