Jaybee in WWBM
Banned
Does crime become less horrific with passage of time?
Sadly, yes.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Does crime become less horrific with passage of time?
Does crime become less horrific with passage of time?
I still say 4 weeks hard time is enough, at his age, but I hadn't considered hitting him in the pocket. Brilliant thinking, Chris. I'd actually be harder than you, financially, on him; 70% of his net wealth. Not sure about the Foundation idea, as charities give less than 10% of their income to their supposed beneficiaries, and I don't think these 'foundations' are much more efficient. I'd rather a government fund be created, and money placed into it to be roughly evenly distributed to abuse victims.
As long as we're talking dollars and not Euros!!
Ha, the imagination spins!! I'm a pacifist, so I could never go to the final extreme of taking a life; but pacifism doesn't mean passive. I'd get medieval on him if I caught him. Even after he paid I'd still slap him around, old man or no.
For a few milliseconds, but deliberate misspelling is only effective when your actual spelling is largely faultless...still, you cannot be blamed for making mistakes, I read somewhere that you are Swede-ish.
Now, THAT is a deliberate misspelling.
And, you're welcome! :smt023
Child.. please....
:smt004
I have been in the states since 49 - the vast majority of my misstakes are due to excitement


who you calling a child?
wow, you've been in this country since '49 and you manage to barely speak English, lol. BTW, how old does that make you Garbo?![]()
He should serve the time in jail that any rapist receives, and then extra for fleeing the country. Rape is rape. Just because the man is old, rich and famous, it does not take the crime that he committed away and it does not make it any less acceptable. That lady for the rest of her life will remember what happened to her. Any persons first sexual partner should be one of their choosing & it should be when they are ready. Who here at 13 would want their innocence taken away? Let him experience rape first hand and then rot in jail.
Just my 2 cents worth.
you're 2 cents is worth 1 yen in some countries
![]()
Good thing there is only one of him;-)
j/k

Let him experience rape first hand and then rot in jail.
A rape for a rape. By your logic, some 31y.o lady teacher who gives her underage student his first experience, thus violating society's trust in her, should be thrown in jail, then raped by her guard, a big, fat, ugly, hairy 55y.o brute.
No, of course not. I think that YOU can't stand him only because he is old, rich and famous.
Jaybee, to say that I’m insulted by your comment is an understatement. My disgust for the man does not come from his wealth, age or his fame it comes from what he did. I cannot stand him because he plied a 13 year old girl with champagne and drugged her then raped her.
He should serve the time in jail that any rapist receives, and then extra for fleeing the country. Rape is rape. Just because the man is old, rich and famous, it does not take the crime that he committed away and it does not make it any less acceptable. That lady for the rest of her life will remember what happened to her. Any persons first sexual partner should be one of their choosing & it should be when they are ready. Who here at 13 would want their innocence taken away? Let him experience rape first hand and then rot in jail.
Just my 2 cents worth.
A rape for a rape. By your logic, some 31y.o lady teacher who gives her underage student his first experience, thus violating society's trust in her, should be thrown in jail, then raped by her guard, a big, fat, ugly, hairy 55y.o brute.
No, of course not. I think that YOU can't stand him only because he is old, rich and famous.
You are equating the forceable rape of 13 year old girl with giving an underaged student "his first experience."
We'll come back to that. Do you, for one second, feel that Polanski should be raped in jail as revenge/retribution?
No, let's not come back to that. Let's stick on the point where you romanticize statutory rape as a means of trivializing the vaginal & anal forceable rape of a little girl who repeatedly said 'no' to her attacker.
You don't set the topic, bucko/buckette. Tarshi wants the rape of Polanski, in prison, as revenge or retribution.
That's it.
If you choose not to, well that's your choice. If you feel comfortable not explaining your post, then we can only assume you stand by what you said.
with men forceably raping little girls .