DenzBenz
Well-Known Member
Reporters Without Borders issued its annual report on countries least tolerant of Internet freedoms:
Enemies of the Internet: China, Cuba, Egypt, Iran, Myanmar, North Korea, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Tunisia, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan and Vietnam.
Countries Under Surveillance: Australia, Bahrain, Belarus, Eritrea, Malaysia, Russia, South Korea, Sri Lanka, Thailand, Turkey, United Arab Emirates.
Source: Reporters Without Borders
THE HILL's Technology Blog, Hilicon Valley, reported that many of the states on the list are authoritarian in structure, meaning free expression restrictions pervade all media. But Reporters Without Borders expressed special concern about the fact it had to include Australia and South Korea in its report -- two states with democratically elected lawmakers. Both states have recently ramped up their Web censorship regimes. In particular, Australia has examined ways to put in place an online content filtering system, which would block access to sites with "offensive material." While some local lawmakers support the legislation's aims, the proposed regulation would give the Australian government vast, ambiguous leverage to define what, exactly, qualifies as "offensive."
Enemies of the Internet: China, Cuba, Egypt, Iran, Myanmar, North Korea, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Tunisia, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan and Vietnam.
Countries Under Surveillance: Australia, Bahrain, Belarus, Eritrea, Malaysia, Russia, South Korea, Sri Lanka, Thailand, Turkey, United Arab Emirates.
Source: Reporters Without Borders
THE HILL's Technology Blog, Hilicon Valley, reported that many of the states on the list are authoritarian in structure, meaning free expression restrictions pervade all media. But Reporters Without Borders expressed special concern about the fact it had to include Australia and South Korea in its report -- two states with democratically elected lawmakers. Both states have recently ramped up their Web censorship regimes. In particular, Australia has examined ways to put in place an online content filtering system, which would block access to sites with "offensive material." While some local lawmakers support the legislation's aims, the proposed regulation would give the Australian government vast, ambiguous leverage to define what, exactly, qualifies as "offensive."