Bokworm said:
I'm not going to argue whether the topic has validity or not. That wasn't the point of my post. My point was this: why add a 51st thread when one can just add onto one of the many existing threads?
That topic has been debated ad nauseum
But everything you hear, ever dirty look, neck snap, eye roll, critique, argument or whatever is age old and redundant. An IR couple has heard ital and several times.. And because sometimes people don't want to read through 67 pages of the same thread. If I see a thread and a new response I read through al of it. If instead of 1 thread with 67 pages I saw ten pages with 6 different threads of the same issue I would at least read one or two. Seeing a million responses scares me off and plus someone might not even know who i am responding.
Athena said:
Missing "race characteristics" in my biracial child: No. Why not? Because I'll just be thrilled to have a healthy child. Why would I want her to have a greater chance of skin cancer or eye damage or a variety of diseases that predominate in the caucasion population? So really "race characteristics" is not an issue in my mind. I just want her healthy & happy.
See I never put it in quotes yet your quote of me features quotes around those two words. Why? Everyone wants a healthy and harpy kid, duh. There are a lot of White people who never get skin cancer and live at the tanning salon.. It may not be an issue but by given some extended medical rationale you simply over did it which in my mind cuts back to the things some uh "M.C. Serch" type individuals have said to me..
I like brown hair, long hair, blue or green eyes, red heads are my favorite. My race in its purist for can't have any of that. I nnow 3 Blacks with green eyes and 1 mixed guy with blue eyes, those are isolated incidents. The things that Black men might had found attractive on you at first sight your saying you don't want your daughter to have? Would YOU give them up?
I don't have the grounds to accuse you of being a wigger or something because on its face what you said was sound. I have no choice but to believe the horse's mouth.
Using black men as a last resort: If this is the reason a couple is together, then they need to resolve it and it's NONE OF MY BUSINESS.
What WM think I am not always privvy too, the same with what BM think amongst themselves. Another couple's business is my business if i think a front or the rebound is the only reason why he got the time of day. If I suspect those are the intents of some WW I want people like Andre and YMRA to know to be diligent. I dont want to see any BM stunted on, that the only reason I am sticking my nose in that business. Our race has been out of the loop so many times that i am just fed up with the surprises and bomb shell revelations. Is that wrong?
Would me telling someone, anyone that they should only date anorexics or straight haired or black haired or black eyed people, or older men should only date older women be at all appropriate in ANY situation?
Okay but i have raised the question when alone with fellow Blacks of all mentalities and not gotten shouted down or attacked. A lot of men like to show off, there is a perception that BM can't get the best type of WW, its a fair topic. As a man that claim hurts..
As a female you might not understand that. I like meat on bones, I felt like some WW felt that gave them the green light to get huge or approach me and expect good results when they were already huge.
Espy said:
no reason to respond to a topic that's been discussed multiple times, or have no desire to reply to the OP because she's suspect at best...For me personally it's a combination of all three. I've already made my opinion on the OP known...
You are openly disrespectful to people who have not approached you in a manner befitting disrespect.. Therefore, I'm not going to interact with you anywhere on the forum, again my right. So if someone doesn't reply you shouldn't assume they have nothing to say, they may just have nothing to say to you. It wouldn't matter what thread you created, or what question you asked at this point, given the way you've chosen to talk to people like FG and Tony... Fortunately for you most of the people here are not that way.. That's another reason I haven't been posting much at all lately
Shes suspect? I agree, but how are you going to make a point with a moot point?! Who cares what yo think about the poster, I don't like David Duke but if I lived in Louisiana and he was my governor I would address him. Not because I like him but because "a broken clock is right at least twice a day.." I think that quote invalidates your logic here.
1, You have nothing to say about Tony.
2. You can't point to a quote proving I started it & I know you want if anyone here asked you to.
3. New members turning you off? How are you gonna bogart a forum? Do know how elementary school that is? Do you even know the owner of this site?!
If you express yourself with disrespect, rudeness, or condescension, don't feign shock and surprise when meaningful, productive dialogue does not follow.
I don't believe you took the high road. If you thought I was rude or out of line you could had fought fire with fire or just given a rebuttal. Instead you take the time to post TO ME about how you refuse to post TO ME. WTF?!
If you would had stayed silent I would not had known you existed or were ignoring me..
I came on and jumped right in just like several people and I brought up stuff that was old news for a lot of the older posters and called a troll for it. So all I'm saying is just be fair babygirl.
If everyone looked up old threads and just left it at that I think the site would become difficult to navigate. In my half-assed defense Andrae I actually did technically search.
I searched google for the threads they said had been done to death and it only brought me one thing. I don't even know what hes even going on about bro..I am glad you shared your discontent with some things here too.
And a dead horse? When was the last year you saw this horse a live and eating hay?! When the Federalists brought up Sally Hemmings in the election of 1800 IRs were already a dead horse issue. If we are living it today how are they going to accuse you and me and others of even bringing up a dead horse? These people are trippin' man lol.
Given that - he still has been unprovokedly antagonistic and rude, based on him missconstruing posts and taken stuff out of context... Its not a wise way to start. History here has proven that more often than not, it doesnt end well when you do that.
Flying Geek everything I thought aided in my accusations I quoted. Every little tid bit I quoted so other readers could no. I explained why it was moot, why it was irrelevant. Can you quote me to prove I was the first to get rude? I doubt it.. Would you refuse to pay ticket because the officer yelled at you during the stop? Instead of saying i took something out of context prove it. Do better then "oh your a big meanie..!!" If you can't take me on and i mean no harm how are you going to defend your IR in public? Or do you even try ma?
If he's going to walking around with my uniform on use some damn lotion or some chap stick. Fuck the army is so damn ghetto.
pwn3d... :smt043
