Yet here you are on whitewomenblackmen.com. There are no races, there is no such thing as "white" yet here you are trying to connect with "white women" on this site?? If you actually believe what you spouted you'd be on allwomenallmen.com.
Hmm where to start? Blacks were enslaved from the early 1600s to 1865. That's not as long a period of the servitude of say the Helots of ancient Greece or even the 400 year servitude by the Israelites in Egypt in ancient Jewish myth. It's true that Africans were distinguished by the color of their skin rather than cultural or ethnic lines like other slaves but the hyperbolic assertions you make aren't true. Blacks for the most part weren't treated as severely as slaves in Rome who had limbs or genitalia lopped off, blinded and killed as entertainment (probably due to the hypocritical "Christian" sentiment of their American masters which made those things "immoral"). They weren't crucified has punishment. They weren't even systematically raped or had their bodies mutilated like native populations throughout the world during conquest (for example like Central American native populations). Blacks suffered and it makes my stomach sick to think about it but let's not hyperbolize or diminish other people to make the suffering of our "own" group worse.
Your ideas on race are also display a couple of common Internet-type misconceptions presented urban-legend style. First of all "race" isn't the same thing as species. The fact that human beings are all of the same species doesn't ipso facto establish there's no such thing as race. Race is a specific term used for humans to distinguish between genetic groups. For example there aren't different "races" of whales. There is no such thing as "races" of canids. You confuse "race" with "species" then make the statements based on that false understanding of definitions.
You should also understand that even between species genetic differences can be minute. And different species can interbreed. For example coyotes and dogs, or coyotes and wolves can and do mate and produce offspring. People want black and white from science but even among scientists distinctions between different species in science are sometimes disputed because such things are both complicated and occasionally political.
Another misconception is you claim there are only phenotype differences and no genetic differences between races but that is false. Just last year The Neandertal Genome Project showed that all currently living homosexual sapiens except Africans have up to 4% Neandertal DNA. That proves that there are genetic differences between the races based not only on genetic drift and diversity but from divergence in our evolution. It seems that whites and asians are part neandertal, in other words partially a different species from African blacks somewhere in their distant genetic history.
Finally you attribute bias against darker skin to "capitalist assholes" but there is an established preference by men of all races to prefer lighter skinned women in societies even within their own population groups, which is even more pronounced for women from other populations. This exists both in societies with colonial legacy (India, USA etc) and in societies with none (Japan, Samoa etc). This is so pronounced that scientists have even speculated that lighter skin and eyes were a distinct "genetic advantage" for women who had those characteristics.
This is America so more power to any man who can pull the type of woman that he wants for whatever his personal reason. But don't try to use speculative or false science to advance your point. Honestly any black man worth his salt shouldn't need to resort to that to pull white women (who are more open to black today than they have ever been in history)
Follow me on this you 1 post wonder,
2 wrongs do not make a right
Why do some folks always insist on throwing out slavery from Ancient Rome, or how such and such whites were slaves as well in history. That doesn't change or ameliorate the enslavement of Africans. All you were left to do was say they were sold by other Africans to whites.
You are using one wrong to rationalize and mitigate another, which speaks volumes to the level of foolishness in such a mindset to do that.
You sit there talking about blacks weren't treated harshly as other enslaved people, how the heck do you know that.
were you shackled and brought to a new world, packed in like sardine in the hull of a stinking ship
were you born into slavery
were you bought and sold like cattle
were you considered less of a human being,
were you torn away from your family and sold off to another plantation.
were you whipped with a bull whip
were you branded as being the property of someone
were you raped by the slave master and had no control over your body
was the bible and god used to enslave and control you, while you suffered
Wrong is wrong is wrong, no matter how its spun.
Talking about other wrongs in history doesn't begin to deal with what is under discussion, its a mere red herring from the events.
The fact is the Europeans did want to enslave the natives of the Americas but they couldn't handle the labor and died off quickly, that is when they turned to Africans.
As a graduate in history I would advise you to read some more on the Trans-Atlantic Slave trade before you utter such rubbish out of your mouth.
As for all your other filth I wouldn't bother to acknowledge that rancorous diatribe.
Your post was a disgusting piece of garbage. As a black man who was born in a country that had slavery, Guyana, I am surely descended from slaves and find your post an absolute disgrace to decent thinking folks.
Trying to quantify the suffering of X,Y,Z during slavery is laughable and pathetic at the same time.
That you try to put a timeline on slavery shows your naivety. Slavery had a legacy, segregation, Jim Crow Laws, lynchings, lack of voting rights, lack of education, rampant discrimination because of skin color.
Slavery the policy ended in 1865, but its legacy still continues to this day. History is a series of events, not removed from each other. There is a brutal, oppressive, legacy to the system of slavery.
A black person can always be identified by skin color and judged on that alone by ignorant individuals, such as yourself judging from the contents of that trash you posted, but you are too foolhardy to realize that.
A man that attempt to rationalize such a system is truly of a disgusting character, no less by comparing it to other systems of slavery, simply stomach churning mindset.
I leave you with a couple of wonderful images of the not so bad system of slavery blacks endured, yeah they had it so luckily compared to those ancients and Central Americans. smh.
