Only a damn simple minded trust fund baby would buy into all the bullshit that has been built out over the decades to legitimize the Confederate Flag as not being a racist symbol. Oh wait....the little Black boy in White face is a trust fund baby....
Gonna have to get you again huh?
Trust funds have nothing to do with this argument. But while you're talking about random things, I just ate Mcdonalds. You wanna somehow bring that into this argument?
Anyway back to the topic on hand.......
The Swastika was originally a sacred symbol in India for Hinduism.
Now if a bald headed guy with boots walked around with a Swastika sign on his shirt does it mean he practices Hinduism or does it mean he's racist?
It means racist, and do you know why? Because the meaning and use of the Swastika has changed.
Now if the meaning of the Swastika which was around over 1000 years before Hitler was born, can be altered and changed.
Then surely the meaning of the mere 200 year old Confederate Flag can change.
When you look at the bald guy and say "he's not Hindu, he's racist". You're implying that he's using the symbol in it's new meaning and not it's original.
Now maybe...just maybe Kid Rock is also using the Confederate Flag in it's new meaning and not it's original.
Simply put, calling Kid Rock a racist is like saying Hitler wasn't racist, he was just Hindu.
Come on...you've got to be smarter then that.
Try again.
P.S-This is the part where you realize you've lost the argument and you decide to just start throwing out random things.
Like I said I just ate Mcdonalds, that's something random you can talk about.:smt043