I know you like to jot down your thoughts quickly but sometimes your sentences run-on far too long and become a bit confusing in translation.
You are also not the only one who watches porn, sunshine. LOL You look at the majority of porn and you see the idealized standard. However, I adore you, but that first paragraph with your question made no sense to me. Could you please rephrase it so I can respond? And hon, I'm not arguing that someone should find me beautiful. I'm not arguing that I should be the norm. I'm arguing that the woman in the video is trying to paint the entire world with the same standard of beauty brush and it doesn't work.. at least not for me because there's far more to consider about the complexity of human relationships and attraction. Eh. I went on a few dates with a really nice man that I should have hit it off with on paper. We just didn't click. We laughed, joked, and talked a lot... but, at the end of the day, it felt flat. He wasn't unattractive, we just didn't gel. It didn't make sense. So, how is what I said BS?
No...bigger women were seen as more fertile because they were fed and could feed their children. Bigger meant access to food...thin meant potentially starving. If youre near starvation, you probably aren't having periods, and you aren't fertile if you have amenorria.
Sorry I'm trying to respond to a whole bunch of posts at once. I meant that bm who seem to date outside the standard of beauty when dating outside their race more so than any other group of men would be considered what exactly? Less conditioned by social standards then wm lm or am or are do they seem to settle more often than not?
great post and so true.....she/he could extend that to other countries as welll... tbh she gets to the basic point that race is a form of status....so anyone non-white feels the need to move up the ladder....usually meaning towards white......it harkens back to the one-drop rule.......black is the bottom, white is the top, so everyone is trying to move up the ladder......her options point is so true........fatter white women have lesser options so they will move down the ladder......settling , i believe is the term..
But, isn't the reality that women who are very obese are likely to have ovulation and fertility problems? Despite being near starvation, nature seems to find a way. I think this explains why we see these television scenes of skeletal women in Bangladesh, India and Africa with babies. Having said that, it's well documented that women who exercise vigorously, long distance runners and others with low body fat levels, are often less fertile or at greater risk of early pregnancy miscarriage. All other factors being equal, women in normal weight ranges, and even a bit thicker or thinner, have the least problems with pregnancy.
Thank you that's exactly my point. Being obese comes with just as many if not more health risks when it comes to child rearing.
European countries along with Canada and Austrailia don't seem to have the same racial hangups and have far less fat people in general for this to be a debate.
you are talking about NOW, I was talking about historically. We haven't totally evolved out of one mindset into the next. 250 years ago thin women were seen as ones who couldn't rear children for the reasons I already mentioned. That attitude goes way back. It doesn't just vanish. We arent there yet. We are battling against both.
suppose i could add my 2 cents, but i'm honestly enjoying the exchange between DB & MF - guess that makes me a bit of a voyeur :smt081
So much for your chances of being liked by the women. In fact, you might have set a record for the guy quickest to say hi and be ignored.
Kind of reminded me of this SWP video I saw awhile back. Talks a lot about the low expectations and standards that everyone assume we have and how many black men do accept those low standards. http://generation-x.net/members/viewVideo.php?video_id=5349&title=ANH_VU_PROBLEM
