Elin now dating a white guy

[TreePixie]

Eloborate please

Marriage isn't about "sucking and fucking" for money. Women have sex because they LIKE it, not because some guy is going to pay them, or give them a nice divorce settlement if HE fucks around.

Acting like her divorce settlement is paying for blow jobs and sex reduces her to the level of a whore, and him to a john. I'd farking hope their marriage was about a whole hell of a lot more than that.

 

[The Dark King]

Marriage isn't about "sucking and fucking" for money. Women have sex because they LIKE it, not because some guy is going to pay them, or give them a nice divorce settlement if HE fucks around.

Acting like her divorce settlement is paying for blow jobs and sex reduces her to the level of a whore, and him to a john. I'd farking hope their marriage was about a whole hell of a lot more than that.

Please read my reply to JC.
You put a value on functions when you demand money thats all thats being said and sorry modern culture often depicts women as doing men a favor by having sex with us even though we do most of the work

 

[TreePixie]

Please read my reply to JC.
You put a value on functions when you demand money thats all thats being said and sorry modern culture often depicts women as doing men a favor by having sex with us even though we do most of the work

Right, and the functions in a marriage are not "fucking and sucking" for dollars. There's companionship, offering support/advice, parenting, running the household (even if you have staff, someone has to arrange things and supervise, etc), traveling with him, showing up at all the business social functions and schmoozing with all the people who can do his career good, perhaps having a hand in some of the businesses etc etc etc

There's a whole lot to any marriage, including one in which wealth exists, than just sex. We haven't a clue what went on in their marriage, except we know they had kids, and that he can't keep his dick in his pants. We have no idea how much support/assistance etc she was, or how valuable that was to him and his career.

It just annoys me to see a woman reduced to a whore or a blow up doll. We're actual human beings.

 

[JordanC]

Please read my reply to JC.
You put a value on functions when you demand money thats all thats being said and sorry modern culture often depicts women as doing men a favor by having sex with us even though we do most of the work

Study these pics fanny. She loved him. She is touching him, looking at him and her body faces him. Body language says she is into him. He had what most guys on this board hope for and threw it back in her face. She wouldn't have "taken" anything from him if he kept it in his pants and loved her and honored his vowed.

If she had married and divorced Andrae/Fanny from NY she would have had support, in line with his ability to pay support. Which I guess would be QUITE A BIT LESS. Fanny's kids don't live as well as Tiger's will. You keep focusing on 100 mil as it means to YOU. She was married to a wealthy man. Fate dealt that to her. When they broke up her support was in line with what HE made, not you.

If he didn't want to give her a divorce settlement he should have honored his vows and kept his marriage good.

 

[The Dark King]

Study these pics fanny. She loved him. She is touching him, looking at him and her body faces him. Body language says she is into him. He had what most guys on this board hope for and threw it back in her face. She wouldn't have "taken" anything from him if he kept it in his pants and loved her and honored his vowed.

If she had married and divorced Andrae/Fanny from NY she would have had support, in line with his ability to pay support. Which I guess would be QUITE A BIT LESS. Fanny's kids don't live as well as Tiger's will. You keep focusing on 100 mil as it means to YOU. She was married to a wealthy man. Fate dealt that to her. When they broke up her support was in line with what HE made, not you.

If he didn't want to give her a divorce settlement he should have honored his vows and kept his marriage good.

Slow down sensitive Sally I never once questioned her affection for him or if she loved him. I'm just trying to understand why she DESERVES 20% of what HE earned. I'm never once said she deserved nothing but to put it in perspective and please be fair. I'm an accountant by trade and this far it's taken five years of education to get here. And if I became a CPA then a CFO I could make 500 grand a year. Let's say I meet you 15 years into my career where I've accumulated the bulk of my assets totaling 10 mill. We get married and you have two kids who you stay home with even though you had to give up a lucrative waitressing job. Four years into the marriage I cheat and you leave and at this point my assets are 15 mill due to good business decisions and my career going well. During our four years you didn't work but had a nanny and cleaning lady to help out which afforded you a lot of leisure time. Since you didn't live a hard life or have to work hard outside of the occasional dinner party for clients why exactly do you deserve 3 million which includes a career I built for over a decade before you got there. What did you actually do that entitles you to anything? I'm not attacking I'm just trying to get your logic.

 

[The Dark King]

Right, and the functions in a marriage are not "fucking and sucking" for dollars. There's companionship, offering support/advice, parenting, running the household (even if you have staff, someone has to arrange things and supervise, etc), traveling with him, showing up at all the business social functions and schmoozing with all the people who can do his career good, perhaps having a hand in some of the businesses etc etc etc

There's a whole lot to any marriage, including one in which wealth exists, than just sex. We haven't a clue what went on in their marriage, except we know they had kids, and that he can't keep his dick in his pants. We have no idea how much support/assistance etc she was, or how valuable that was to him and his career.

It just annoys me to see a woman reduced to a whore or a blow up doll. We're actual human beings.

It annoys me that you put greatier value on her just because she is a woman. She took care of their home not just his, she took care of their kids not just his. She played her role in their family. What's his compensation for being the bread winner being "allowed" to be her and his kids?
And let's be fricking real for a second Elin Woods was not closing deals for Tiger he has an army of lawyers and agents for that so please stop suggesting that her going with to cocktail dinners landed him huge endorsements like Buick and Gillete. Him the best fucking golfer to ever touch a club did that. Decades of relentless practice and sacrafice got him to where he is not a nice "baby you can do it" and if he owes Elin 20% shit does his mother and father deserve 50 and then maybe another 25 to his coaches because those people have far more to do with Tiger Woods being Tiger Woods. She came into the picture after he had made something of himself. She definitely did do 100 million dollars worth of service to his career. Please stop over valuing her just because she's a woman and you emphathize as a divorce.

 

[JordanC]

It annoys me that you put greatier value on her just because she is a woman. She took care of their home not just his, she took care of their kids not just his. She played her role in their family. What's his compensation for being the bread winner being "allowed" to be her and his kids?
And let's be fricking real for a second Elin Woods was not closing deals for Tiger he has an army of lawyers and agents for that so please stop suggesting that her going with to cocktail dinners landed him huge endorsements like Buick and Gillete. Him the best fucking golfer to ever touch a club did that. Decades of relentless practice and sacrafice got him to where he is not a nice "baby you can do it" and if he owes Elin 20% shit does his mother and father deserve 50 and then maybe another 25 to his coaches because those people have far more to do with Tiger Woods being Tiger Woods. She came into the picture after he had made something of himself. She definitely did do 100 million dollars worth of service to his career. Please stop over valuing her just because she's a woman and you emphathize as a divorce.

Which really talented golfer portrays the image you want for your company ....plays the Jeopardy song. Take your time. Offer the one who is better an endorsement deal.

 

[The Dark King]

Which really talented golfer portrays the image you want for your company ....plays the Jeopardy song. Take your time. Offer the one who is better an endorsement deal.

JC are you serious right now? That man's biggest endorsements came from Nike Gatorade and Gillete which all had everything thing to do with him being a WINNER. That shit had nada zilch nothing to do with him being a married man or family man since he got those endorsements years before Elin was even a nanny. You are giving that woman far too much credit for that man's successess. Wow.

 

[GQ Brotha]

LOL MrF, you feel strongly about this divorce and alimony topic bro. Might have made a great divorce attorney fighting for your clients.

 

[Inner Beauty]

LOL MrF, you feel strongly about this divorce and alimony topic bro. Might have made a great divorce attorney fighting for your clients.

I agree!

LOL @ all the pix

 

[The Dark King]

LOL MrF, you feel strongly about this divorce and alimony topic bro. Might have made a great divorce attorney fighting for your clients.

Dude I often think about it but the downside is being the very piece of shit who helps to swindle people out of their money. I don't have the stomach for it. I think it's more my accounting background. I struggle to find why fiduciary responsibility and/or compensation for being a wife and a mom is so much. If I had to advise a client on getting married it's the worst fiscal investment you can make. Where you get so little but are liable for so much. Even the IRS can't hit you that hard unless you're involved in a felony

 

[GQ Brotha]

Dude I often think about it but the downside is being the very piece of shit who helps to swindle people out of their money. I don't have the stomach for it. I think it's more my accounting background. I struggle to find why fiduciary responsibility and/or compensation for being a wife and a mom is so much. If I had to advise a client on getting married it's the worst fiscal investment you can make. Where you get so little but are liable for so much. Even the IRS can't hit you that hard unless you're involved in a felony

Yeah, I was thinking that too. You seem to feel the numbers just don't add up in these alimony situations.

Maybe I'm naive since I have never been married, thus never divorced and experienced the divorce court system.

 

[The Dark King]

Yeah, I was thinking that too. You seem to feel the numbers just don't add up in these alimony situations.

Maybe I'm naive since I have never been married, thus never divorced and experienced the divorce court system.

Damn you get me my Caribbean brother from another mother. Lol

 

[orejon4]

Tone does it again. I swear, you and Petty ought to have a talk show. LOL

look at the fucking legs on this one :smt095

I thought you knew! Jordan's legs are the gold standard.

 

[orejon4]

Damn you get my Caribbean brother from another mother. Lol

It ain't worth it. LOL. Unless either of you needs legal status to remain in a given country with the other, don't do it. You can have just as happy a relationship without jeopardizing everything you have built on the whims of another or yourself.

 

[TreePixie]

It ain't worth it. LOL. Unless either or you needs legal status to remain in a given country with the other, don't do it. You can have just as happy a relationship without jeopardizing everything you have built on the whims of another or yourself.

That's pretty much where I am. It's not like I want more kids. Why the hell would I remarry?

 

[orejon4]

That's pretty much where I am. It's not like I want more kids. Why the hell would I remarry?

Ditto. No reason whatsoever. You can have just as much romance, sex, passion, intellectual stimulation and togetherness without risking your income, property, children's inheritance and more.

He's Cablinasian

Shhh...he's multiracial.

 

[The Dark King]

It ain't worth it. LOL. Unless either of you needs legal status to remain in a given country with the other, don't do it. You can have just as happy a relationship without jeopardizing everything you have built on the whims of another or yourself.

Careful my friend. You're making sense lol

 

[Tamstrong]

She made a choice to give up her job and to be fair if you want to cover her wages lost for giving up her nannying job for however long they were married then so be it and maybe a decent house for the kids and some money to go to school and for babysitters if needs be but 100 million dollars?
And nothing gets under my skin more than when people say she took care of her kids and the home. I grew up and been around affluent people my entire life and people with that kind of money have a staff. Get the picture of Elin pushing a vaccuum around their 20,000 square foot home out of your mind I'll bet my balls they had maids or cleaning people for that shit.
And whatever time you CHOOSE to give up to take care of YOUR kids not just his is on you. Compensating people for raising their own children is disgusting and people should be down right ashamed of themselves for wanting that. Child support and spousal support are two totally different things. If you want to look at a family as two people who equally contribute how the fuck can Elin equally contribute? She can't. I'm not saying she doesn't deserve anything that would be ridiculous but for what she brought to the marriage a 1 million dollars for every year they were married would be fair.
I agree that the kids should still live a good lifestyle but that has nothing to do wuth what the mother is awarded thats a child support issue.

And GQ like I said I don't like cheaters but this penalty bs is ridiculous because if she cheated on him she'd still get compensated just because she's the mother of his kids. When that much wealth is involved people are rarely if ever in it for love. She wanted a comfortable lifestyle and he probably wanted a family.

You're not being fair or realistic here, Drae.

You keep harping that the choice for her to stay home & raise her kids is completely on her & that's a load of crap. Within a marriage the decision as to whether or not someone will stay home is typically made by BOTH partners. Yes, there are many women who would love to be able to stay home & raise their children, but there are also many men who want or expect their women to stay at home. The fact that there was enough money being made for her not to have to work outside the home is a blessing I'm sure they both appreciated. Many men are proud of the fact that they can provide such benefits for their families, because it's not always easy to afford to do in today's society. If it was easier, many more families would have a parent at home with the children.

As far as contributions to a marriage being "equal", it doesn't have shit to do with money. Being the bread winner doesn't make him the more important partner in the marriage. I think you're too focused on the money itself & not what's really important. To say that her contribution was or wasn't worth a certain dollar amount is not for anyone else to decide. Different things have different values to different people, & in many respects it's a subjective thing. To some people, a parent staying home to raise the children is priceless.

He made the choice to dishonor his vows & destroy his family, & it's only fair that he be held accountable for that. Like Jordan said, the amount of that percentage is based on a person's income, & if it was someone who made less, they would've paid less. The only screwing over he got was what he did to himself.

It's also unfair to assume that love was not basis of the relationship. How can you say without knowing that she was just looking for "a comfortable lifestyle" & the he "probably wanted a family"?

It's funny that when it comes to a rich man, there's always a negative focus on the woman who dates or marries him, assuming that she just wanted him for his money. Sometimes it's true & sometimes not, BUT it makes no sense for all the focus to be on the woman & assuming she's some whore looking to get paid. There is also a negative side to some rich men in their pursuit of women. The ones who use their money as a way to buy the women they want are just as bad as the women who are looking to be bought. When it comes to whores & whoremongers, one can't exist without the other.

Right, and the functions in a marriage are not "fucking and sucking" for dollars. There's companionship, offering support/advice, parenting, running the household (even if you have staff, someone has to arrange things and supervise, etc), traveling with him, showing up at all the business social functions and schmoozing with all the people who can do his career good, perhaps having a hand in some of the businesses etc etc etc

There's a whole lot to any marriage, including one in which wealth exists, than just sex. We haven't a clue what went on in their marriage, except we know they had kids, and that he can't keep his dick in his pants. We have no idea how much support/assistance etc she was, or how valuable that was to him and his career.

It just annoys me to see a woman reduced to a whore or a blow up doll. We're actual human beings.

Study these pics fanny. She loved him. She is touching him, looking at him and her body faces him. Body language says she is into him. He had what most guys on this board hope for and threw it back in her face. She wouldn't have "taken" anything from him if he kept it in his pants and loved her and honored his vowed.

If she had married and divorced Andrae/Fanny from NY she would have had support, in line with his ability to pay support. Which I guess would be QUITE A BIT LESS. Fanny's kids don't live as well as Tiger's will. You keep focusing on 100 mil as it means to YOU. She was married to a wealthy man. Fate dealt that to her. When they broke up her support was in line with what HE made, not you.

If he didn't want to give her a divorce settlement he should have honored his vows and kept his marriage good.

Great posts, TP & JC. I couldn't have said it any better.

 

[The Dark King]

You're not being fair or realistic here, Drae.

You keep harping that the choice for her to stay home & raise her kids is completely on her & that's a load of crap. Within a marriage the decision as to whether or not someone will stay home is typically made by BOTH partners. Yes, there are many women who would love to be able to stay home & raise their children, but there are also many men who want or expect their women to stay at home. The fact that there was enough money being made for her not to have to work outside the home is a blessing I'm sure they both appreciated. Many men are proud of the fact that they can provide such benefits for their families, because it's not always easy to afford to do in today's society. If it was easier, many more families would have a parent at home with the children.

As far as contributions to a marriage being "equal", it doesn't have shit to do with money. Being the bread winner doesn't make him the more important partner in the marriage. I think you're too focused on the money itself & not what's really important. To say that her contribution was or wasn't worth a certain dollar amount is not for anyone else to decide. Different things have different values to different people, & in many respects it's a subjective thing. To some people, a parent staying home to raise the children is priceless.

He made the choice to dishonor his vows & destroy his family, & it's only fair that he be held accountable for that. Like Jordan said, the amount of that percentage is based on a person's income, & if it was someone who made less, they would've paid less. The only screwing over he got was what he did to himself.

It's also unfair to assume that love was not basis of the relationship. How can you say without knowing that she was just looking for "a comfortable lifestyle" & the he "probably wanted a family"?

It's funny that when it comes to a rich man, there's always a negative focus on the woman who dates or marries him, assuming that she just wanted him for his money. Sometimes it's true & sometimes not, BUT it makes no sense for all the focus to be on the woman & assuming she's some whore looking to get paid. There is also a negative side to some rich men in their pursuit of women. The ones who use their money as a way to buy the women they want are just as bad as the women who are looking to be bought. When it comes to whores & whoremongers, one can't exist without the other.






Great posts, TP & JC. I couldn't have said it any better.

You keep failing to see the point of my post I didn't say she didn't deserve to be taken care of in some way since she's the mother of his kids and that would affect them negatively if she were stressed for money, but my overall point is why is her contribution to the relationship worth twenty percent of what took him decades to earn especially if she were only there for four years of it and didn't help to get it. And of course her contribution had a dollar amount since the court awards money based on that contribution.
Him being the bread winner makes his contribution more important because it allows them the lifestyle which everyone seems so quick to fight over, there's a settlement of emotional support two hugs a week when you're use to getting five or a mandatory I'm thinking about you text every week. So if the fight is over assets and monetary things of that nature then of course the money part is the most important part. Not my logic my friend its the courts.
Again I'm not saying she shouldn't get anything but the amount she's getting is beyond ridiculous. A million for every year they were together plus two million per child for every year she raised them while he was away fine, thats light years more money than she would ever made as a nanny(the career she "gave up" to be with him). But 20 percent? Come on that's just excessive.
And you know how I know I know she wanted comfort and he wanted a family because thats what they both got as a result of the marriage, it doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure that out. Again I will say this one more time, I'm not saying they didn't marry for love I'm just trying to figure out you guys come to the conclusion she DESERVES 20 percent of his worldly assets for four years of marriage. Remember child support is a totally differnt issue.