Bookworm616
Well-Known Member
Okay, if you clicked on this thread and will now be upset that I spoiled the 8th HP movie for you, then you only have yourself to blame. LOL.
I'm about to give my review of the 8th HP movie, so if you haven't seen it yet and want to: STOP READING RIGHT NOW.
This thread can also be used to discuss the books and other movies, too.
HARRY POTTER AND THE DEATHLY HALLOWS PART II
review by: Bookie
There were many things that were great about this movie and many things that were a bit of a head scratcher for me (especially given the shorter run time).
What I loved:
Snape's death scene. I love the added line when Snape tells Harry: you have your mother's eyes. I like that much better than in the book when he just says look at me and then dies.
Snape's memories in the pensieve. I thought they did a better job of showing just how attached he was to Lily Potter. It was heartbreaking to watch him go through all of that. And Alan Rickman did a fantastic job of showing the right amount of emotion. I really think the Snape death scene and pensieve scene were the crowning moments in the ending.
Ron and Hermione's kiss. The scene in the book is cute and funny and I liked it, but I think they improved on it in the movie. I like that it was a private moment between them. I think they deserve to have some privacy for their first kiss. And I thought the way they filmed the scene, it was the perfect place and time for their first kiss.
The Forbidden Forest and King's Cross. I thought they showed what needed to be shown and it was a great adaptation from the book. I loved how Voldemort yelled "Avada Kedavra!!" when he "killed" Harry. And the moment between Harry and Dumbledore was nice, though they left some stuff out from the book that would have been nice to see. But, I digress.
The Malfoys leaving. They didn't leave in the book, but I like how they did it in the movie. Draco (sniff, sniff) wasn't in a whole lot of this movie, but I really think the actor nailed it at the end when Hogwarts fighters were facing Voldy and the Death Eaters and Draco's parents were calling for him to come over to them. You could tell that he really didn't want to stay on the "Good Side" but he also had no desire to go back over to the "Bad Side". And I liked how instead of sticking around, they left at the first opportunity. It truly showed that whilst they didn't want to be involved with the Death Eaters anymore, they also didn't switch sides. They became Switzerland. It really drove the point home that they chose to stick together as a family, which was a nice ending for them.
This is STRICTLY MY OPINION but
What they botched in this film:
The epic battle scene at the end. They hardly showed any of it! It was too much but also, it wasn't enough. I liked how they added the shield over Hogwarts and the line of Death Eater's storming Hogwarts a la LOTR (that was so unbelievably ripped off from LOTR 2 & 3), but they didn't spend enough time inside the castle with everyone fighting.
Fred's death. They didn't show it happening. WTF? LOL.
Neville killing Nagini. I'm happy they still had Neville killing Nagini, but it should have been in front of everyone including Voldemort, like in the book. And why wouldn't Harry tell Neville to kill Nagini, instead of telling Hermione and Ron? They already knew all of that! The point was to make sure that 3 people knew what to do, in the event that Harry dies (like he was planning to do by going into the Forbidden Forest).
And seriously, the epic battle between Harry and Voldemort at the end SUCKED. It was anti-climactic and there is this awesome exchange between them in the book that is nowhere to be found in the movie. Why wouldn't Harry tell Voldemort in the movie that Draco was the true master of the Elder Wand? It shows how truly evil Voldemort is, because when he finds out it's Draco he just flippantly tells Harry that he'll take care of Draco after he kills Harry. I mean, really, why leave that out?? And Harry telling Voldemort that Snape was good, wasn't in there either, I don't think.
And why oh why did they have Harry and Voldemort face off ALONE? In the book, everyone witnesses it and then congratulates Harry when it's all over. No one is around when Harry finishes him off. It's DUMB. I really think that having everyone witness the end of Voldemort is the release they need after all of the stress of fighting and seeing their family and friends dead. They don't get that at the end of this film.
Bellatrix and Voldemort disintegrating instead of just dying. WTF is that all about? Dumb.
And Harry fixing his wand with the Elder Wand was missing. Why would they leave that out??
I could go on. I think I've said enough though. LOL.
Share your review of the movie! I thought the movie was good, but it could have been so much better and the fact that the run time was 2 hours, it's a head-scratcher that they'd leave some of the stuff that I mentioned out of the movie.
All in all, I would give it 3 out of 4 stars, but I wish I could have given it 4 stars. It's not the best of the franchise, in my opinion.
I'm about to give my review of the 8th HP movie, so if you haven't seen it yet and want to: STOP READING RIGHT NOW.
This thread can also be used to discuss the books and other movies, too.
HARRY POTTER AND THE DEATHLY HALLOWS PART II
review by: Bookie
There were many things that were great about this movie and many things that were a bit of a head scratcher for me (especially given the shorter run time).
What I loved:
Snape's death scene. I love the added line when Snape tells Harry: you have your mother's eyes. I like that much better than in the book when he just says look at me and then dies.
Snape's memories in the pensieve. I thought they did a better job of showing just how attached he was to Lily Potter. It was heartbreaking to watch him go through all of that. And Alan Rickman did a fantastic job of showing the right amount of emotion. I really think the Snape death scene and pensieve scene were the crowning moments in the ending.
Ron and Hermione's kiss. The scene in the book is cute and funny and I liked it, but I think they improved on it in the movie. I like that it was a private moment between them. I think they deserve to have some privacy for their first kiss. And I thought the way they filmed the scene, it was the perfect place and time for their first kiss.
The Forbidden Forest and King's Cross. I thought they showed what needed to be shown and it was a great adaptation from the book. I loved how Voldemort yelled "Avada Kedavra!!" when he "killed" Harry. And the moment between Harry and Dumbledore was nice, though they left some stuff out from the book that would have been nice to see. But, I digress.
The Malfoys leaving. They didn't leave in the book, but I like how they did it in the movie. Draco (sniff, sniff) wasn't in a whole lot of this movie, but I really think the actor nailed it at the end when Hogwarts fighters were facing Voldy and the Death Eaters and Draco's parents were calling for him to come over to them. You could tell that he really didn't want to stay on the "Good Side" but he also had no desire to go back over to the "Bad Side". And I liked how instead of sticking around, they left at the first opportunity. It truly showed that whilst they didn't want to be involved with the Death Eaters anymore, they also didn't switch sides. They became Switzerland. It really drove the point home that they chose to stick together as a family, which was a nice ending for them.
This is STRICTLY MY OPINION but
What they botched in this film:
The epic battle scene at the end. They hardly showed any of it! It was too much but also, it wasn't enough. I liked how they added the shield over Hogwarts and the line of Death Eater's storming Hogwarts a la LOTR (that was so unbelievably ripped off from LOTR 2 & 3), but they didn't spend enough time inside the castle with everyone fighting.
Fred's death. They didn't show it happening. WTF? LOL.
Neville killing Nagini. I'm happy they still had Neville killing Nagini, but it should have been in front of everyone including Voldemort, like in the book. And why wouldn't Harry tell Neville to kill Nagini, instead of telling Hermione and Ron? They already knew all of that! The point was to make sure that 3 people knew what to do, in the event that Harry dies (like he was planning to do by going into the Forbidden Forest).
And seriously, the epic battle between Harry and Voldemort at the end SUCKED. It was anti-climactic and there is this awesome exchange between them in the book that is nowhere to be found in the movie. Why wouldn't Harry tell Voldemort in the movie that Draco was the true master of the Elder Wand? It shows how truly evil Voldemort is, because when he finds out it's Draco he just flippantly tells Harry that he'll take care of Draco after he kills Harry. I mean, really, why leave that out?? And Harry telling Voldemort that Snape was good, wasn't in there either, I don't think.
And why oh why did they have Harry and Voldemort face off ALONE? In the book, everyone witnesses it and then congratulates Harry when it's all over. No one is around when Harry finishes him off. It's DUMB. I really think that having everyone witness the end of Voldemort is the release they need after all of the stress of fighting and seeing their family and friends dead. They don't get that at the end of this film.
Bellatrix and Voldemort disintegrating instead of just dying. WTF is that all about? Dumb.
And Harry fixing his wand with the Elder Wand was missing. Why would they leave that out??
I could go on. I think I've said enough though. LOL.
Share your review of the movie! I thought the movie was good, but it could have been so much better and the fact that the run time was 2 hours, it's a head-scratcher that they'd leave some of the stuff that I mentioned out of the movie.
All in all, I would give it 3 out of 4 stars, but I wish I could have given it 4 stars. It's not the best of the franchise, in my opinion.
Last edited: