Elin now dating a white guy

Status
Not open for further replies.
Bookworm616 said:
There are women out there that aren't complete bitches to their exes and who don't use their children as means to making more money.

Please stop using stupid numbers like 99% to describe a whole gender. That's just insane.
Click to expand...

Thank you, Bookie! Take a look sometime at the numbers on non-custodial parents who actually pay the full amount of court mandated child support. It's shockingly low. And notice I didn't genderize that, because women who don't have custody are also bad at paying support.
 
goodlove said:
unfortunately 99% of the women are not like you. to them the kids are bargaining tools. the women would rather be dragged to court before they let you see the kids because they know it will cost you money. The thing is men need to start taking them to court and say women will need to pay the court costs and atty fees along with jail time. you may not get all that (jail time) but that will scare the shit out of em. make sure you get the atty fees. I will say this no one want men to walk away in favor (financially) meaning you making them pay the atty fees and court costs because men are devalued in this soceity. if men get together and get legal issues like that done then it would prevent women from doing that shit. that is why men complain about Child support because we have to pay atty fees on top of seeing the kids to make women let us see the kids. that is why a lot of men kick womens asses because they pull that slick shit.
Click to expand...

Goodlove, you always state the same opinion just word it slightly different. I get the feeling you are stating what happened to YOU, no matter what the subject is on here. Are you reading?

Do you read what happens to others. I think you didn't fight a good fight. So you didn't get taken.........you ex outsmarted you in the legal system. Are you really adding to the conversation on custody and such??? I think if you want more of your daughter you will quit whining and go after it. Get a lawyer or go to legal aid. Do SOMETHING if you really think you got treated unfairly.
 
FG said:
uhm, acctually.... her parents are a journalist and a politician and the nanny gig certainly does not define her, I don't think it was her career choice - its common for Swedish girls to do that for a few years to travel.
I think since she has taken up her degree again, I think its a Master but not sure.
She comes from a well off family with extremely well educated people - She is guaranteed to be both worldly and open-minded, rest assure of that.
Click to expand...

there is no guarantee of anything, all that is, is an asumption. rich families tend to be some of the most close-mined there are. hence why they can be so lavish in a world of abject poverty. but that is beside the issue.

elin was a nanny, i'm not knocking her for having a job, but on the levels of social status. no where would a nanny be considered the equal of the world's greatest golfer.

as far as education goes, it's a red flag, if a woman leaves a country with subsidized education to be a nanny, and doesn't think about school again until five years later after she gets a nice settlement from her rich husband...

that doesn't sound very worldily to me.
 
Last edited:
TERRASTAR18 said:
there is no guarantee of anything, all that is, is an asumption. rich families tend to be some of the most close-mined there are. hence why they can be so lavish in a world of abject poverty. but that is beside the issue.

elin was a nanny, i'm not knocking her for having a job, but on the levels of social status. no where would a nanny be considered the equal of the world's greatest golfer.

as far as education goes, it's a red flag, if a woman leaves a country with subsidized education to be a nanny, and doesn't think about school again until five years later after she gets a nice settlement from her rich husband...

that doesn't sound very worldily to me.
Click to expand...

Truth bomb!
 
TERRASTAR18 said:
there is no guarantee of anything, all that is, is an asumption. rich families tend to be some of the most close-mined there are. hence why they can be so lavish in a world of abject poverty. but that is beside the issue.

elin was a nanny, i'm not knocking her for having a job, but on the levels of social status. no where would a nanny be considered the equal of the world's greatest golfer.

as far as education goes, it's a red flag, if a woman leaves a country with subsidized education to be a nanny, and doesn't think about school again until five years later after she gets a nice settlement from her rich husband...

that doesn't sound very worldily to me.
Click to expand...



Sounds like a grounded, practical person to me. If she was so busy living high on the hog and living the life why would she go back to school?
 
JordanC said:
Sounds like a grounded, practical person to me. If she was so busy living high on the hog and living the life why would she go back to school?
Click to expand...

Because she went to school she's grounded? Talk about reaching.

Let me remind you Hitler was a pretty good painter.
 
JordanC said:
If she was truly just going to live off Tiger's money she wouldn't give a flyinig leap about school.
Click to expand...

Because you know her patterns lol.
there are murderers getting masters in English lit and social work as we speak woman lol. First of all just because someone wants to live lavishly doesn't mean they aren't interested by education. A little close minded of you kid.
 
JordanC said:
Sounds like a grounded, practical person to me. If she was so busy living high on the hog and living the life why would she go back to school?
Click to expand...

delusions of grandeur. grounded but she chased tiger for everything he was worth,wanting half at one point. she doesn't seem like the type, considering she spent most of her adult life in front of crying babies, the latter part while her husband was travelling around the world. this is typical attitude of someone who gets a lot of money w/o earning it. she knows no value of money.....spending 45g a year(rollins' tuition). it's all just a gimmick. she got into a school she otherwise wouldn't have, so she is living out some fantasy, she couldn't have under cheapskate tiger. how come there was no talk of college when she was with him?
 
TERRASTAR18 said:
delusions of grandeur. grounded but she chased tiger for everything he was worth,wanting half at one point. she doesn't seem like the type, considering she spent most of her adult life in front of crying babies, the latter part while her husband was travelling around the world. this is typical attitude of someone who gets a lot of money w/o earning it. she knows no value of money.....spending 45g a year(rollins' tuition). it's all just a gimmick. she got into a school she otherwise wouldn't have, so she is living out some fantasy, she couldn't have under cheapskate tiger. how come there was no talk of college when she was with him?
Click to expand...

Her kids are young terra. Most women don't choose to have a baby in the middle of getting an education. Most do it before or after. A lot of times people drop out if they get pregnant in college. When you have a kid up all night your brain is shit. Not conducive to getting good grades and passing.
 
JordanC said:
Her kids are young terra. Most women don't choose to have a baby in the middle of getting an education. Most do it before or after. A lot of times people drop out if they get pregnant in college. When you have a kid up all night your brain is shit. Not conducive to getting good grades and passing.
Click to expand...

You're forgetting one immportant fact at the wealthy. They more often than not have nannies that help out A LOT.
 
MrFantastic said:
You're forgetting one immportant fact at the wealthy. They more often than not have nannies that help out A LOT.
Click to expand...

True but I have never seen "hired help" with Elin.

Think about Heidi Klum and Seal. You always see their nannies with them for just a trip out to the Dr. And same for Sandra Bullock and many others. Have never seen a nanny with Elin.
 
Bookworm616 said:
Let's not lump almost 100% of women in this category, please.

I would say the number is far less. You only hear about the sh*tty women who pull that, of course, because those are the stories that are more interesting and spark debate.My daughter's father was in that boat. He had a child with a woman he didn't marry. He was paying this woman (who didn't work and used their son as her "meal ticket") $500 a month (on his own, not court mandated) and he saw his son for FOUR HOURS A MONTH.

I started dating him and put a stop to that immediately. I told him if he's paying her that amount of money he needs to have his son every other weekend. It soon came to pass.

Then she started using his visitation as ways to extort money from him. That stopped immediately, too.

And now, he's been living with his Dad for several years and he's doing much better in school and actually has hopes of a bright future.

I do not get child support from my husband. When I go in front of a judge to finally get divorced, I will waive my right to child support, knowing full well I can't ask for it later on. Why? Because whilst I make less than him, if I ask for support, he'll lose the house. He helps me out in other ways (fixing my car, giving my car oil changes, etc) as well as giving me some of the money to help pay her camp and care when he can. That's all I ask.

And since the day I moved out, I made sure our daughter spends every other weekend with him. And she spends other time with him as well.

There are women out there that aren't complete bitches to their exes and who don't use their children as means to making more money.

Please stop using stupid numbers like 99% to describe a whole gender. That's just insane.
Click to expand...

Like you ONLY hear about shitty men. you rarely hear about men going thru shit like what YRMA and I are talking about. you will see most wanted posters of men needing to pay child support but you will never or raely see women gone to jail for withholding a visitation. only 4% of the men in the US have custody of the kids. what does that say about fairness in the courts

JordanC said:
Most states work off a formula where the amount each parent makes is input then the formula takes into account how many days a month the kid is with each parent. It is very fair. A lot of men don't take their kids for the majority time. The ones who do are more rare. Also men get remarried quicker ususally within the first year. Don't know if they are related.

I had a male friend moaning about his child support amount. I said uhhh......how many days a month are the kids with you?? He said a number, like 4 days I think. I said well right there's your problem. She is housing and feeding them more days. You either pay with your time or you pay with your wallet. He grumbled that he didn't want them anymore because he liked weekends to do single guy stuff. Nothing more to say.
Click to expand...

lumping arent we ?

TreePixie said:
Like I said, in MA they are separate issues, and I could have been jailed if I withheld visitation. We were in and out of court on child support for two years until I gave up bothering, and he had a stack of contempt citations a mile high, but the court did little to actually enforce support. In fact, of the two issues, withholding visitation was seen as a far more serious issue (which I dont quite get - if I didnt feed my child I'd be guilty of neglect, and not paying support amounts to the same thing), as it's considered of utmost importance that the child maintain a relationship with both parents.
Click to expand...

1) they rarely if ever jail a woman for withholding a child. they will but you have to do it multiple times.

2) if you didnt get child support and he end up paying you will get back child support and he has to pay interest to the state (in alabama) . if you denied a man his child is there back visitation ? NO. men have to suck it up.
 
JordanC said:
Goodlove, you always state the same opinion just word it slightly different. I get the feeling you are stating what happened to YOU, no matter what the subject is on here. Are you reading?

Do you read what happens to others. I think you didn't fight a good fight. So you didn't get taken.........you ex outsmarted you in the legal system. Are you really adding to the conversation on custody and such??? I think if you want more of your daughter you will quit whining and go after it. Get a lawyer or go to legal aid. Do SOMETHING if you really think you got treated unfairly.
Click to expand...

thats because you women bring up the same bullshit about men dont take care of their kids. women who do that shit is suspect.
 
What else is new, another hot blonde taking a brother to a cleaner.

One word for you dumb nuccas Prenup or better yet don't cheat
 
karmacoma. said:
Whining, leaving neg rep, and defending the very women who fucked him over is his stock in trade.
Click to expand...

fool grown folks are talking. sit your ass in the corner...little ass bitch.

JordanC said:
Amen.

Nothing I hate worse than people who sit around and whine about THINGS THEY CAN CHANGE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Whining isn't going to get you shit. Action does.
Click to expand...

Its funny. when men take your ass to court that is change. so stop bitching on TV and on the net about men not doing this and that for the kids when you have a part in it also.

if Im not mistaken you women were the ones bitching about child support and what not. YRMA commented on visitation and I added on. women just cant handle being accountable for their actions.

example: when a man cheats on his wife its because its his sexual appetite, when a woman cheats its because a man neglected her. In other words women want to be held to different standards when it suits their situation. want equal rights then take the good and the bad that goes with it
 
TDR said:
What else is new, another hot blonde taking a brother to a cleaner.

One word for you dumb nuccas Prenup or better yet don't cheat
Click to expand...

exactly. the problem is women want to have different standards . when they cheat they should have to give up custody and thus should have to pay child support because they are women
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom