urgh, i wonder if you get dizzy, spinning circles and doing whatever you can to avoid the point and make up things to pass your weakily argued points across like they have relevance.
but i will humor you one last time-
point 1- you did argue about it, your whole basis of argument is somehow my posts come from a place of anti ww pov, hence why you go on a tangent as seen in the 2nd paragraph f the quote inn post 422, page 43 of this thread.
point2-sellout rhetoric? you are getting overly-sensitive. i'm calling you the approriate terms based on your actions......
point3- and you worry about my contribution so much, why again? if you were so genuinely concerned, you would ask me....but you and the drama queen who co-signed your post in the thread, wanna draw your own conclusions so you can talk shit later. but then again, i wouldn't be surprised cnsidering it's the same cast of characters who went at me for my first post, which i crictisized someone for calling a bm a gorilla. i guess they knew i wasn't an asskisser, wetting his pants over foot photos.
