YOU are full of shit - I'm still stating the EXACT thing I have ALL along and been on topic all along - what the fuck is wrong with you. Mr cant be wrong.
Kuno did NOT read what you originally stated, you never ASKED!!! You made a definite statement on what the reality is (and you have over and over again in many other threads)... and now, you keep moving the goal post. Sheesh.
Those are just wealth indicators and would you deny that wealth is attractive? (post 74 my very first post on the topic relating to wealth in this thread)
Besides, a big part of her post disproves your original statement and also, a big part of her post is something I have said in SEVERAL posts in this fuckin thread. Her prior post, was a side discussion w Bookie and yet, you keep using it as some sort of proof that you are right. There is one person that has +sorta+ sided w you and part of her post is the exact same thing I said - but yet she is right and I am wrong .. that is fuckin hilarious. Seems to me YOU are the one that cant stay on topic or read correctly, Mr Straw man.
You even have been told by several men that your goal post is moving but you conveniently ignore their posts. and latch on to the one poster that somehow will justify you.
Well Bookie and I were having a different discussion in that particular post.
As for the original discussion, Andrae asked if wealth was an attractive quality. He didn't ask if it was the only one.
But the responses were very clear...which was that the money a man makes does not factor in any shape or form in helping to decide on a relationship.
In the sole example that was used where it might factor in (and later used to represent all the women in the forums thinking), it didn't even register in the "Top 10 Things I Want in a Mate". The top ten! I mean I have to ask - exactly how many other qualities are more important- does having a great income really fall below "#10: wears matching socks" lol?? I'm kinda sensing a bit of PC on it, that's all.
Because it makes me wonder if two similarly, nice-personalitied men were genuinely wooing you, and one dined you at the local chinese takeout each night and rode you home on the bus while the other dined you at Le Bec Fin and drove you to your doorstep in a car each night, who would you gravitate towards?
I do understand your point when you cite the proof is in the numbers of women who marry average-incomed men, but as Saty pointed out; "by sheer numbers alone most men and women are not wealthy". So just by economic dating pool choices, most women WILL end up meeting and marrying average-incomed men, even if their prefer it to be otherwise, no?
I personally don't mind either way if a guy I like is wealthy or not, but I would never, ever knock a man's wealthiness down to be a negative..c'mon now. If he was wealthy, it would surely add to our life, not negate it OR our relationship, nor would I run from it based on a belief that he must be an asshole because he's well off. (post 332 Kunoichi's response to you)
"people aren't reading" is your fuckin defense when the majority, including several men have told you your original point has been moving and you keep building straw men arguments and scew what people say to you as well as saying they dont read. For fucks sake, you look like a fool with that shit - You have NO other interest than being right. I'm done - I need a break from your absolute nonsense
