Sarah Palin Had a Fetish For Black Men

Giordan said:
...and a one night stand with NBA player Glen Rice.

At least according to a new book soon to be released:



http://www.sportsgrid.com/ncaa-basketball/sarah-palin-glen-rice-national-enquirer/You heard about that book on Sarah Palin by author Joe McGinniss, right? The one where he moved in next to her, and the whole thing seemed kind of creepy?
Click to expand...

Ugh, what a creep. That he moved in to perv on her every move? Im no fan of Sarah, but NOTHING is more uglier and disgusting to a woman than a CREEPY guy.

BTW, lot's of Black guys (and male Libs in general) want to bone her, so no surprise one did.
 
11tvpc3.jpg
 
TreePixie said:
Probably not a PC thing to say, but I think his brain was white-washed. ;-)
Click to expand...

I would say, more like right winged washed. He ignores the obvious and suggests that people should raise themselves up by their bootstraps. Yet, he has ignored the reality that his admission to some of the prestigious schools he attended was based on affirmative action policies existing at the time.

Like many of those folks, he's all about maintaining the status quo, as long as he has assured his own success. first.
 
Kunoichi said:
BTW, lot's of Black guys (and male Libs in general) want to bone her, so no surprise one did.
Click to expand...

Not a Palin fan either, but I definitely would tap that. BTW, why is it that if a white woman has a relationship and/or sex with a black man that it is a "fetish"?
 
Last edited:
Darkseid said:
Not a Palin fan either, but I definitely would tap that. BTW, why is it that if a white woman has a relationship and/or sex with a black man that it is a "fetish"?
Click to expand...
Because the people in the Tea Party envision all blacks as being 65% human and 35% animal. The Tea Party is founded upon racist principles and ideologies.

The mainstream media doesn't believe that BM/WW relationships are based on some sort of fetish. It's love, just like all of the other kinds of relationships.
 
Mikey said:
Because the people in the Tea Party envision all blacks as being 65% human and 35% animal. The Tea Party is founded upon racist principles and ideologies.

The mainstream media doesn't believe that BM/WW relationships are based on some sort of fetish. It's love, just like all of the other kinds of relationships.
Click to expand...

Yes, but the thing is that the author of the book seems to be the one describing it as a "fetish"
 
Mikey said:
Because the people in the Tea Party envision all blacks as being 65% human and 35% animal. The Tea Party is founded upon racist principles and ideologies.

The mainstream media doesn't believe that BM/WW relationships are based on some sort of fetish. It's love, just like all of the other kinds of relationships.
Click to expand...

When I was a kid we called the Tea Party the Confederacy
 
Darkseid said:
Yes, but the thing is that the author of the book seems to be the one describing it as a "fetish"
Click to expand...
Yeah, I noticed his name was Joe McGinniss. It sounds like a WM, so I guess what he says shouldn't be taken so critically.

Logically, some WM would think that a relationship involving a WW with a BM is a fetish and not really about genuine love anyway. It goes back to my previous post, as McGinniss is indirectly implying that we are animals and not humans with what he said.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom