Personal anectodes are never going to win you a thread: I know petite women that prefer big guys Big guys that prefer bigger girls Bigger girls that like athletic guys Petite girls that like regular guys etc. It means nothing. Everyone has a preference. Or some of us keep it "open." :smt077
The last line is very true. When you're more open, you have more options. I wish I were more open, but I can't help who I'm attracted to.
The knicks are looking good. Could be better(hoping for Chris Paul big time and a little chemistry) Boston is looking really rough though. If you want me in speedos you shall have me in speedos my love lol.
Chris Paul would be so nice.... Well, I'm holding out till the season starts to see how everything pans out. I was kidding, cause you mentioned swimwear. Speedos are gross...lol You think so? I think I'm limited....lol
How so? Your definition of short, for example, is extremely short...you pretty much cover 80% of the male population with that height range. Other than your preference for brothas...but, let's keep it that way shall we?
5'8 you mean? Talk about short, I've dated 5'3-5'5 dudes, but I'm not going down that road again. No, Napoleon complexes for me again...lol I've dated mostly taller men who have been 6'0 - 6'2. Tallest I ever dated was 6'4. My ex was 5'9, so that made me open to shorter men (notice I said, "shorter", not extremely short...lol)I'm not open when it comes to weight though, cause I'm not attracted to a bigger guy. As far as BM go, I exclusively date BM, but just because I date BM, doesn't mean I'm interested in every brother I see...lol
Being open to a range of men, and being interested in a range of men, or women are vastly different things.
Being open to a range of men = good thing Being interested in a range of men = limiting...lol I guess what I was getting at is, that if I dated different races of men, I'd have more options, but like I said, I can't help who I'm attracted to.
I saw that! Thank you! lol No disrespect to Kenya, but your location says NY, I rather go back there...lol
I've said this numerous times since I've been posting here but it needs to be said again. Women are way more shallow and its not even close. Lets be real folks, when has a man ever cared about a females' backaccount??????? Yeah thats right...NEVER. Also, women value and care about material items waaaaay more than men do.
Men are acknowledged for their assets (money, status, power etc.) Women are acknowledged for their looks....
"A woman's test is material. A man's test is a woman...if a man could fuck in a cardboard box, he wouldn't buy a house." - Dave Chappelle.
Actually, studies show fidelity to be the primary consideration in choosing long term mates, followed by looks, family commitment, wealth and status.
That's true, cause men do things to get and for pussy...lol That's good to know. Going by what you hear or see, one might think differently...lol I was just saying what we're judged by as far as the sexes go....
In this 21st century where women are yelling all over the place for equal rights this crap is still the case?
