Lady you just like reaching for the sake of reaching. You simply just don't hae a clue. If someones comes into your house then its open season. If a man kidnaps you its open season. No jury in the world would convict in either case. But if you are in a fist fight and pull your gun and kill, then here comes a life sentence for murder. Attempting kidnapping and burgarly? Lady this stuff is no brainer. You and your crazy comparisons are crazy. Example. Me if I'm out and a guy is causing a problem with me I may exchange a few words but I will alk away. Now if he continues to follow and be the aggressor now he about to fuck around and have a problem on his hands. Wth these handgun permits you cannot go looking for trouble and then scream self defense when you find that trouble and kills someone.Trouble has to come to you. When Zimmerman followed this boy at that moment his self defense claim wasn't worth more then urine that sits in a bladder. Damn what happened after that, you following me looking for trouble. As a matter of fact Trayvon attorneys could use self defense "stand your ground". Hell he was the one protecting himself and standing his ground.
Lady huh? "Young man" you simply just don't have a clue, because you don't really read, do you? You just like any excuse to squawk like a condescending parrot. Which part of my
"what G Zimmerman did to Trayvon would have resulted in TRAYVON claiming stand your ground if Tray had used a gun"....
didn't you GET? None obviously, since you ignored my OPENING paragraph
where I wrote it TO YOU... and then typed the same damn thing at the end of your post like you're the only one to figure that shit out. Please.
Yes, most definitely my example was hypothetical. In fact, as I have said before which you may have missed, if Trayvon had had a gun he would have been justified to kill Zimmerman in defense.
Tell me, do you even know what HYPOTHETICAL means? You must have a tiny clue because you ASKED me if my original example to Andraeboba was. And when I said "YES it WAS", your eye must've twitched because you missed it.
Next! I gave you
multiple examples of
defending your life with a hand-gun, and all you could manage was a: "
With these handgun permits you cannot go looking for trouble and then scream self defense when you find that trouble and kills someone. Trouble has to come to you...". Well no shit, Sherlock. As
IF my examples demonstrated to you someone looking for trouble. Young man, this stuff is no brainer..
Now stop with
YOUR crazy comparisons. I don't know anyone who was in a "bar fight" who invoked the SYG law and got off. They might try - but they'll fail. There's even a recent case in FL where the guy shot the man on the basketball court - after the victim went for the gun owner's gun to protect his daughter - and the gun owner is in jail
trying to use the SYG Law...Plenty people will
try to use it but the law was made for REAL victims ONLY.
So to reiterate: Trayvon case is NOT a SYG law case since no self-defense for ones' life HAPPENED
and I'm NOT TALKING about bar fights.....So why do keep arguing me like I'm saying it is?!