The jury always had the right NOT to believe Zimmerman's explanation of events that night.
They could have had reasonable doubt anything he said occurred that evening was even true.
He got off because he wasn't Black, Trayvon was, and the jury was nearly all White women.
Has anyone ever seen someone who's really, REALLY had their face beaten up in a life-threatening attack??
There was nothing life threatening about the fight between GZ and TM, therefore no excuse to use deadly force in self-defense.
Zimmerman admitted to having MMA training and I'm sure he covered up his face as he was trained to do to protect himself from blows by an opponent.
To me this case was no different than the Casey Anthony acquittal, where the defendant was inexplicably given EVERY benefit of the doubt and assumption of truth by the jury.(Even worse in the Casey Anthony trial since the defense attorneys admitted their client was a pathological liar.)
Nothing about GZ's story made sense to me, that's why I would have been comfortable charging him with manslaughter.
Definitely White privilege was in play in that trial.
There's just no way a BM gets the same verdict with the same jury after admitting to shooting dead an unarmed White teen.