Ol'Skool Classic
Well-Known Member
Dale Chihuly Glass Art
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Hey, Daddy Ra! :smt006
I read your question in the comment section of my pin. The answer was no I hadn't, so I had to look for the unedited version of that piece...:smt023. I was thinking it'd be a nice addition to that thread you created for Pixie and me way back when. What do you think?
You make it sound as if I painted the piece & want my permission to post it. I say go ahead, especially if you're thinking about possibly fully reviving that particular thread for regular postings. :smt023
phoenix out of ash. beautiful.
No, Smarty Ra, that's not what I'm saying. :smt019
It's the opinion of another smartass friend of mine that the piece doesn't fit the site, and I was wondering if you thought it did. I think it fits the IR category just fine, but not being the expert on Egyptian mythology that you are, I wasn't familiar with the story behind the image.
I'd love to revive that thread if we can fill it with quality images (I do have a few in my collection). As you are well aware, not everyone understands the difference between sensual and skanky.
I dug up the thread, and the original image isn't there any more, so it needs to be reposted. It was by Luis Royo, right?
Quit teasing with the tongue. You like smartass anyway.:freehug:
As to the piece in question, other than the fact that they are anthropomorphic characters from Egyptian mythology, I don't see how it doesn't fit the nature of the IR category considering Sekhmet in the piece is fair of skinned & Anubis is dark skinned, never mind that posters here have put up pics of actual animals with white & black fur or skin to represent IR on numerous occasions. And "yes" some people can't tell the difference between sensual & as you say skanky.
Yes the piece was by Luis Royo, but may have been a one off or altered (at least the original pic that I posted in the thread may have been) because the pic seems to be a black & white painting when I have seen it in subsequent viewings since that initial finding & posting. May be why it's no longer in the thread because it's not the authentic version of the piece. :smt102 The guy still appears to be black, but not as dark as in the version that I initially came across back at the time. And "no" I don't have the copy I originally posted as the laptop I had at that time is now junk & I've been using a completely different laptop for quite sometime.