Bill Cosby Rape Accusations

pettyofficerj said:
I better shut up before I catch a case

Look how they're bringing back cosby's Spanish fly skit from the 60s
Click to expand...

Bwahahaha

pettyofficerj said:
I woke up with his underwear in my mouth

He said they were pudding stains!!!!!
Click to expand...

pettyofficerj said:
Bill cosby touched my penis
Click to expand...

That's all kinds of awkward. Hope you didn't eat his pudding pop.

EuroChick said:
Wow, that's crazy (but also hilarious). :smt023
Click to expand...

That statement he attributed to Cosby had me rolling.
 
The Dark King said:
Well thats the thinking we need to get away from. Just because a few of these women were lying opportunist doesn't mean they all were. In fact if even just one out of 20 was actually raped, which I fully believe is the case, fuck Bill Cosby and Fat Albert too. Dude is scum
Click to expand...

Respect!

TDk might be stubborn and might like to debate till cows come home but gotta to appreciate his willingness to listen to potential evidence and reevaluate the scenario/reconsider his stance on this case.

Repped for this post.
 
archangel said:
Some one mention Theo in another thread. I wonder about Malcolm Jamal's opinion on bill Cosby.
Click to expand...

Malcolm-Jamal-Warner-1.jpg


Who cares. He's shirtless in this pic :smt049
 
CAP said:
Respect!

TDk might be stubborn and might like to debate till cows come home but gotta to appreciate his willingness to listen to potential evidence and reevaluate the scenario/reconsider his stance on this case.

Repped for this post.
Click to expand...

Thanks fam greatly appreciated.
I saw a video with some of the women on Dr. Phil and that raw emotion is real as fuck. Something happened to those women no denying it.
 
archangel said:
I didn't follow this. It seemed like there was a lack of evidence.

Also AP, you are losing creditability with me. How is it ok to blast a man's info but not the accuser's info.
Click to expand...

Because when its a woman accusing there's no way she'd lie. Women don't lie duhhh
 
pettyofficerj said:
Ah...almost forgot

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ual-assault-student-code-conduct-hearing.html

So...what does this mean for the person(s???)who brought forth these allegations
Click to expand...
It means she can appeal THE SCHOOL's decision. Hahaha that you think that was a court.

She testified... but all 3 men refused to. Ah yeah... where football is God at Florida State and so is the QB.

As the woman's lawyers said..'At some point we have to recognize that Florida State is never going to hold Jameis Winston responsible.'

Time to protest. #DONTRAPE. Will you march with us?
 
Bliss said:
It means she can appeal THE SCHOOL's decision. Hahaha that you think that was a court.

She testified... but all 3 men refused to. Ah yeah... where football is God at Florida State and so is the QB.

As the woman's lawyers said..'At some point we have to recognize that Florida State is never going to hold Jameis Winston responsible.'

Time to protest. #DONTRAPE. Will you march with us?
Click to expand...

The next time the court mentions that they don't have sufficient evidence that you committed a crime. I'm just going to assume you did it. guilty until proven innocent that is the American way!
 
archangel said:
The next time the court mentions that they don't have sufficient evidence that you committed a crime. I'm just going to assume you did it. guilty until proven innocent that is the American way!
Click to expand...

Arch...it wasn't a judicial court. Do you understand that?
 
pettyofficerj said:
Court or not it still shut a lot of people up...especially the ones hoping this would get him kicked off the football team
Click to expand...

Nothing would get that star player kicked off. Not shoplifting, not sexual cursing buffonery ...and certainly not an accusation of rape. Hail Mary.
 
Bliss said:
Arch...it wasn't a judicial court. Do you understand that?
Click to expand...

Absolutely true it was not a judicial court. The local prosecutor did investigate (although that investigation has produced a lot of controversy as well http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/...e-allegations-against-fsu-jameis-winston.html) and determined that there was insufficient evidence to charge Winston with rape, so there was some legal process before this FSU code of conduct hearing and the hearing was presided over by a judge that reviewed more than a thousand documents from three other investigations.
 
Loki said:
Absolutely true it was not a judicial court. The local prosecutor did investigate (although that investigation has produced a lot of controversy as well http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/...e-allegations-against-fsu-jameis-winston.html) and determined that there was insufficient evidence to charge Winston with rape, so there was some legal process before this FSU code of conduct hearing and the hearing was presided over by a judge that reviewed more than a thousand documents from three other investigations.
Click to expand...

Thank you. That's what I meant. I shouldn't have used court.
 
Loki said:
Absolutely true it was not a judicial court. The local prosecutor did investigate (although that investigation has produced a lot of controversy as well http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/...e-allegations-against-fsu-jameis-winston.html) and determined that there was insufficient evidence to charge Winston with rape, so there was some legal process before this FSU code of conduct hearing and the hearing was presided over by a judge that reviewed more than a thousand documents.....
Click to expand...

Yes the original article update article relayed that the DA didn't file charges. We knew that last year due to a snooping TMZ reporter triggering the case.

Your link also reiterated why....


The DA admiited it was a flawed investigation. That the cops....

failed to follow the obvious leads that would have quickly identified the suspect as well as witnesses, one of whom videotaped part of the sexual encounter. After the accuser identified Mr. Winston as her assailant, the police did not even attempt to interview him for nearly two weeks and never obtained his DNA.

The detective handling the case waited two months to write his first report and then prematurely suspended his inquiry without informing the accuser. By the time the prosecutor got the case, important evidence had disappeared, including the video of the sexual act.

“They just missed all the basic fundamental stuff that you are supposed to do,” Mr. Meggs said in a recent interview. Even so, he cautioned, a better investigation might have yielded the e
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom