What Would You Do?

orejon4 said:
I would not have spoken to her in the first place. I would have just filmed her and given the film to the authorities/media. But if she spit on me, I would have to walk away or risk losing it.
Click to expand...

I hear you and agree but I don't think he was wrong
 
You are never gonna win by smacking a woman. It doesn't matter if she boiled your rabbit or set your house on fire.

Once you lay hands on her, nobody cares what she did to you.

I would have just gotten her name and some identifying piece of info (license plate, address, phone number) and posted it on youtube, facebook, twitter etc. That way the internet justice warriors can go after her.
 
Thump said:
You are never gonna win by smacking a woman. It doesn't matter if she boiled your rabbit or set your house on fire.

Once you lay hands on her, nobody cares what she did to you.

I would have just gotten her name and some identifying piece of info (license plate, address, phone number) and posted it on youtube, facebook, twitter etc. That way the internet justice warriors can go after her.
Click to expand...

Women can do anything a man can do........and do it better......except take a slap :smt005
 
Dude was being hella lame and was provoking/harrassing her repeatingly asking the same dumb ass question with that camera in her face. I'm sick of this YouTube/world star culture people starve of.
 
4north1side2 said:
Dude was being hella lame and was provoking/harrassing her repeatingly asking the same dumb ass question with that camera in her face. I'm sick of this YouTube/world star culture people starve of.
Click to expand...

Now this I agree with, killa...especially world star

What kind of 'black' site is that
 
orejon4 said:
Spitting on someone is one of the foulest things someone can do to you. I wonder if the court would consider her spitting as an assault, justifying a response from him. They should.
Click to expand...

Last time I checked, spitting was assault..especially spitting in someone's face
 
orejon4 said:
Then he was acting in self-defense, right?
Click to expand...

Self defense when it involves a man and a woman isn't as cut and dry tho

Usually a man is expected to restrain himself or apply force equal to or below the level he was given

It's like a man punching a woman in the mug after she pushes him....no ones going to back that in the court of public opinion...but legally it would seem as self defense if justice is gender neutral
 
pettyofficerj said:
Self defense when it involves a man and a woman isn't as cut and dry tho

Usually a man is expected to restrain himself or apply force equal to or below the level he was given

It's like a man punching a woman in the mug after she pushes him....no ones going to back that in the court of public opinion...but legally it would seem as self defense if justice is gender neutral
Click to expand...

True. You're supposed to apply only the force necessary to stop the assault. Any more than that and you have to show that you had a reasonable fear of something more powerful forthcoming.
 
orejon4 said:
True. You're supposed to apply only the force necessary to stop the assault. Any more than that and you have to show that you had a reasonable fear of something more powerful forthcoming.
Click to expand...

The smartest criminals know just how far they can go to avoid being righteously knocked out

If i spat on someone, and they knocked me out cold, stabbed me or cut off a limb....you think I would hesitate filing a lawsuit lol
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom