Cutting their nose to spite their faces with that dumb shit. Hilary just can't win with some people even if halos came out of her ass. How people try to correlate this dumb shit with Hilary is baffling and laughable. No politician is a saint so you choose the next best thing and if it is between this clown and Hilary i am all for Hilary and unless Jeb or probably Kasich wins the rest of the clowns do not have a prayer next year.
This, I must say this is a very thought provoking and elaborate hypothesis. ...but it cannot be discounted. ......on the other hand , the BLM motive might be simpler: ......"Let us crash Bernie's microphone. ...he has the largest umbrella of patience and tolerance and we have the best chance of embedding our cause in his platform". ......
These people remind me of "the new black panthers"... Agent provocateurs coming out of nowhere, no one really knows them, doing stuff that no one in the black community can really fathom or get behind... "Curiouser and curiouser" is right!
Bush vs Hillary? Not good I'll take just about any candidate over those two. I really would like for Powell to run but we all know that's not happening.
They raided Jeb Bush's event.. http://www.newsweek.com/jeb-bush-black-lives-matter-362569 Interesting choice of candidates they are targeting..
Trump on the BlackLivesMatter movement........ http://thinkprogress.org/election/2...-if-they-try-to-speak-at-his-campaign-events/
Clinton was very recently, at one of her events I believe, beating up on both Bush and Rubio on their records and comments involving women's issue and the current Planned Parenthood hoopla from the debate. So if they show up at any of Rubio's eventual events as a next target, possible Clinton related pattern forming. Still nothing concrete yet for me.
Notice though, Trump is not targeted by Billary or #BLM? That's why l mentioned 'Interesting choices' of who BLM are targeting. When l heard Trump's comments yesterday, it reinforced my suspicion that he's trumping for Billary. Naturally Dems will bite and take his comments at face value, seeing them as "confirmation" that he must be anti-black, but if you look at the sublime, he repeatedly attacked Sanders calling him weak, soft, a coward so to speak...but not with the BLM movement itself. Keep in mind, Trump has never actually had issues with BP, and even sympathized with the recent traffic incidences. l think he genuinely likes BP, even if they don't like him. So one would think that after picking a fight with #BLM, Trump would be their target, right? Nope...it's Jeb. These interruptions seem politically calculated and not emotionally calculated, IMO.
Not really. They know Trump has virtually no chance of winning. I guess that's the "politically calculated" point you are making.
Personally I don't buy the Trump as Clinton troll. Both from a Clinton stand point and a tactical BLM standpoint, it seems like the disruptions thus far are targeting candidates likely to actually be in the nomination run for either side IMO. Bush & Rubio seem the two most solid for possible nomination contenders for the Conservatives when all said and done.
This is getting crazy. BLM goes after who they have access to and not who you feel they should go logically afterwards. It has multiple branches without a head and that means there will not be one idea.
I don't want Hillary to win either, but you have to give her credit for being intelligent. Much too smart for that. :smt030
It's not who we feel they should go after. IF repeat: IF they actually have any tactical planning behind any of their disruptions, that is what they would/should be doing.
They don't have any planning lmao:smt042 much like occupy wallstreet. This is what an unplanned movement looks like unlike the tea party movement.
And therein lies another thing. They could very easily make it into a serious planned movement if the various factions took the time to actually coordinate and plan. You would think people would learn from the Civil Rights movement. No where near the level of ways and points of contact as today, but had shit organized and on point more often than not.
Yea These people who start these movements rarely are experienced so they don't win and then how do you control other people who want to use the name... There is very little information thought in schools now about how to use the government. You get your usual 50 states 3 branches blah blah blah(and even that people may not know... I heard a lot of Americans can't pass the citizenship test) but there is barely any information on starting a civil right organization.
Another issue is that these people are driven by anger and this is their chance to use it. In their own minds, there is no room for logic because the actions from the offender had no logic other than to deprive, deceive and destroy.
Very interesting. Buried at the bottom of the article, this paragraph is especially interesting: The protests are targeting both parties in the presidential field as activists attempt to draw attention to the movement. Hillary Clinton met with activists in private after a Tuesday campaign event in New Hampshire. Curiouser and curiouser...
I don't know that she's "too smart" for that. She's getting into trouble with her personal email server. That's not very bright.
