Peach State Scholar
Well-Known Member
His friend the OB/GYN Dr. Huxtable?
:smt043:smt043:smt043
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
His friend the OB/GYN Dr. Huxtable?
This a class action civil suit at this point.
There's individuals chasing money and if there wasn't a penny involved, Allred wouldn't be representing this case.
People don't need a script to figure out how the story is supposed to go, which is why not every single one of these women is probably a victim.
The burden of proof in a civil suit I believe is just circumstantial evidence.
The NYT magazine played its part, and the more women who come forward with a similar story help build the civil case against Cosby.
Don't be surprised before it's all said and done that the number of victims reaches close to 100, at which point most Americans will understand this went from a story about a celebrity who drugged and raped women to a money grab by other women who had consensual sex with Bill Cosby.
I think Cosby raped women back in the day, no doubt.
But I also have a problem with a woman who believes she was raped and NEVER reporting it to police.
It would be like me saying that a person stayed overnight at my house as a guest then 15 years later I decide to tell someone that person robbed me.
It doesn't work that way.
Bill Cosby has been a BM his entire life.
If a woman was hurt enough to believe she was raped, reporting it to the police would have ended his career in a blink.
Bill Cosby was famous in the '60s and '70s, but not like he was in the 1980s.
A WW claiming rape in the 1970s had way more juice than Cosby did being accused.
If Roman Polanski had to leave the country for a rape accusation in the 1970s, there's no way Cosby could dodge a rape charge during the same period.
I'm sorry, but BM in the 1970s even Hollywood stars and athletes didn't have enough status to go around raping WW without consequences.
Exactly my point which makes it so hard to believe. A single act maybe two but when it's common knowledge and everyone just says ok? Don't but it. American history has shownme too much.
All you have to do is read through this thread to get the answer as to why most rapes go unreported.
I listen to sports radio on my way home from work every day, and with this Patrick Kane rape investigation going on, there have been tons and tons and tons of rape apologists calling in.
And the hosts rip into every single one of them. But my reason for bringing that up is that they said something last week that is so fitting for this conversation.
When someone has been robbed, you don't question whether or not that person was a victim. They are immediately viewed as a victim.
But, when someone claims they're raped, then all sorts of people come out of the woodwork and the person (most of the time it's a woman) is left trying to prove that she was actually a victim.
It's disgusting. And it's also the reason that most rapes go unreported. Because the woman (in most cases) has to deal with her guilt of wondering if she did/wore anything that could have caused this to happen to her, and she has to deal with the backlash by most everyone who won't believe her.
Back in the time of free love and free flowing drugs of the 60s and 70s and back before "date rape" was a thing, who would believe ANY of these women???
It was the perfect cover for a serial rapist to go unnoticed.
I had no idea that it was common knowledge back in the 60s, 70s, and 80s that Bill Cosby regularly drugged women and raped them.
:roll:
His friend the OB/GYN Dr. Huxtable?
Cosby's daughter is my friend and I don't defend him but from her eyes you can't imagine. I wishwe'd stop talking about thisBILL WOULD TALK ABOUT THIS. I really wishyou'd stopHE WOULD.
Maybe you could tell her to tell him to tell the truth.
Which is?
He drugged girls to rape them.
And where is the proof?
Look I'm not saying it's not creepy but this is why we have the burden of reasonable doubt. If it's pure hear say we can't just simply convict. In what other circumstance would he hear someone allegedly committed the same exact crime without a shred of proof and convict.
How can one person do this dozens of times and not one slip up nI illegitimate kids, no clothing with Cosby DNA, no police reports no investigations, no tabloids just no trace at all? He must be the greatest criminal master mind to be so controlled and disciplined to never make a mistake. Not only that he had to be so pursuasive to convince law enforcement that grew up in Jim crow America to look pass allegations of rape against a black man in the 60s and 70s.
That's a shit ton of mental hurdles to clear.
Maybe you could tell her to tell him to tell the truth.
I do find it ridiculous that someone would even post such a comment, to much info and not inclined to get a good reaction.
So we shouldn't talk about a potential serial rapist as it upsets a "possible" friend of the family, don't read the thread would be my answer if you are that upset.
I do find it ridiculous that someone would even post such a comment, to much info and not inclined to get a good reaction.
So we shouldn't talk about a potential serial rapist as it upsets a "possible" friend of the family, don't read the thread would be my answer if you are that upset.
I do find it ridiculous that someone would even post such a comment, to much info and not inclined to get a good reaction.
So we shouldn't talk about a potential serial rapist as it upsets a "possible" friend of the family, don't read the thread would be my answer if you are that upset.
TDK, you change your username?You're right. I lost control of emotions for a sec. My bad. Thanks fam.
You're right. I lost control of emotions for a sec. My bad. Thanks fam.
TDK, you change your username?![]()
You're right. I lost control of emotions for a sec. My bad. Thanks fam.