actually it wasnt, it was in answer to what you had said, and it was also giving you the website for the US abstinence AIDs program in Uganda.
i dont know what you were reading but we were talking about AIDS funding and I was referring to the abstinence program. wasnt talking at all about foreign aid
That is what you said. After you replied to my religious school post. Which was about the US not Uganda.
sorry, i dont know what you are talking about sir, i was talking about AIDS Funding, and havent left that subject. If you can post what you are talking about and explain then i can answer
Promoting abstinence instead of safe sex practices is the most twisted and unrealistic policy burdening societies today. It isn't working, it never has and never will. This does not only apply to avoiding STD's but also pregnancies and teenage pregnancies. Some religious crusaders amongst us still give to the illusion that it is the only answer to the problem, this is a close minded and dangerous attitude. Prevention programs should be equally based on science, education using today's knowledge and tools available (condoms) and yes, morals as well. But not the kind of judgemental, religious berating that currently goes on we need an open minded education of what works in the real world of 2006.
i dont know what that post is about. I was talking about AIDS Funding/ the Abstinence program, cutting funding for AIDS if its not working and putting the money into other areas for AIDS. I havent a clue about your post above, sorry mate.
Use the money to mass produce the product with US patent number 5676977. Google it. Side effects:hepatomegaly ( enlarged liver) but still functional (much better than these other AIDS drugs like AZT (DNA analog) that'll kill ya before ya get better). :evil: