Bill Cosby Rape Accusations

K said:
Yes darlin.....my point is.... someone(s) wanted to get at him and cause him some major irritation and fuck with his life for a bit, and they did.

It doesn't really matter what he did or didn't do. They got what they wanted.

("They" NOT being the females who came after him)
Click to expand...
Agreed
 
  • Like
Reactions: K
ColiBreh1 said:

yawn3.png
This is gonna be such a waste of time & money. This is the Micheal Jackson child molestation cases all over again.
Click to expand...
Yes,and much sooner than MJ.
 
flaminghetero said:
Man those bitches brought their own drugs and drink to the scene.

You have ZERO proof he drugged them without out their knowledge....

Come on now Brothers....DAMN.

Anything you mofos see on TV gets you to stampede like mindless morons.
Click to expand...


You know a court of law isn't about PROOF but who the jurors believe is telling the real deal.

Chicks don't usually bring booze and drugs to parties. Dudes have that shit on ready because they're working these females to get some pussy.
IMO Cosby took the shit too far when IMO he said fuck the bullshit, I'm gonna get these females semi conscious and bust a nut.

Cosby didn't do it ALL the time, but he did that slimy shit enough to have it bite him in the ass in his old age.

Like Pryor's ex-wife said, if Cosby hadn't been so self-righteous about the state of Black America in the 21st century, none of this probably would have come up.

Cosby is the LAST dude who should be telling Black folk how to act 'right'.

He fucked up when he started believing his own hype.
 
andreboba said:
You know a court of law isn't about PROOF but who the jurors believe is telling the real deal.

Chicks don't usually bring booze and drugs to parties. Dudes have that shit on ready because they're working these females to get some pussy.
IMO Cosby took the shit too far when IMO he said fuck the bullshit, I'm gonna get these females semi conscious and bust a nut.

Cosby didn't do it ALL the time, but he did that slimy shit enough to have it bite him in the ass in his old age.

Like Pryor's ex-wife said, if Cosby hadn't been so self-righteous about the state of Black America in the 21st century, none of this probably would have come up.

Cosby is the LAST dude who should be telling Black folk how to act 'right'.

He fucked up when he started believing his own hype.
Click to expand...
God forbid he tell niggas to pull their pants up, he must be destroyed
 
andreboba said:
You know a court of law isn't about PROOF but who the jurors believe is telling the real deal.

Chicks don't usually bring booze and drugs to parties. Dudes have that shit on ready because they're working these females to get some pussy.
IMO Cosby took the shit too far when IMO he said fuck the bullshit, I'm gonna get these females semi conscious and bust a nut.

Cosby didn't do it ALL the time, but he did that slimy shit enough to have it bite him in the ass in his old age.

Like Pryor's ex-wife said, if Cosby hadn't been so self-righteous about the state of Black America in the 21st century, none of this probably would have come up.

Cosby is the LAST dude who should be telling Black folk how to act 'right'.

He fucked up when he started believing his own hype.
Click to expand...
That didn't happen fella'.
As a matter of fact they were ALL caught lying.

You're the gullable ilk tactics like trying a person in the media best influences....shameful.


Pryor's washed-up coked-ex wife can sit her raggedy ass down somewhere,
 
Soulthinker said:
True indeed and the prosecutors are too chicken to touch him.
Click to expand...

A sitting President is constitutionally immune (except for impeachment crimes) from ordinary criminal prosecution, state or federal, but is of course subject to ordinary prosecution the instant he leaves office.
 
MightyLighty said:
I don''t believe you. So you telling me he can shoot someone on site, camera's roiling and not be arrested on the spot?
Click to expand...

When it comes to the law there can be many different interpretations, but basically...https://www.washingtonpost.com/post...e-prosecuted-probably/?utm_term=.61fa4d555c11

"First in 1973 with President Richard M. Nixon, and then again in 2000 with President Bill Clinton, the OLC (The Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel (OLC)) determined that the indictment or prosecution of a sitting president “would be unconstitutional because it would impermissibly interfere with the President’s ability to carry out his constitutionally assigned functions.” Despite its Nixon-era origins, the theory is not that the president is above the law, but rather that any criminal case must wait until after he or she leaves office.

The issue is one of separation of powers. Although the Constitution sets out a mechanism by which Congress may remove the president — the impeachment process — any attempt to prosecute the commander in chief before he or she leaves office would, in the OLC’s view, constitute an unworkable intrusion into the president’s core responsibilities. Both in 1973 and 2000, the OLC analysis noted that the presidency is unique because the executive branch is ultimately led by a singular figure on call and on the job 24 hours a day, unlike Congress or the judiciary. If one or more members of the legislative or judicial branches are temporarily distracted, others on the job can step in to keep business going.

Not everyone agrees with the OLC’s view of the law. Hofstra law professor Eric Freedman, for instance, has argued that the office’s interpretation “is inconsistent with the history, structure, and underlying philosophy of our government, at odds with precedent, and unjustified by practical considerations.”
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom