Many people of Christian faith are incredibly loving, forgiving, helpful and beautiful-souled people.
I'd pit them against any of their haters in terms of character and someone to be in the company of.
Co-sign. :smt023
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Many people of Christian faith are incredibly loving, forgiving, helpful and beautiful-souled people.
I'd pit them against any of their haters in terms of character and someone to be in the company of.
Many people of Christian faith are incredibly loving, forgiving, helpful and beautiful-souled people.
Dan Cathy isn't, thus this thread.
No one said all Christians are intolerant bigots who seek to impose their values on the culture at large, however MANY try to do so.
I consider myself to be one,(lapsed at times!lol), and I know personally that many Christians are some of the most hateful-with-a-smile people around but they cover it by saying they are following the teachings in Scripture.
For instance if someone said that my church had an obligation to marry same sex couples, I'd be the first to stand up and say NO WAY, you can't demand that.
But on the other hand, I would never try to deny another adult his/her civil right to get married.
I don't think that's a fair statement. You don't know the man. Because he upholds what the Bible (which is the word of God) defines as marriage makes him unloving, unforgiving, etc.? I guess God is too then......right?
The bible is the word of God? Dont remember Christ saying that. Can you direct me to the scripture?
I am embarrassed at my sheep-minded parents that go along with everything on the Southern Baptist Convention agenda and/or Fox News. It's disgusting. They are caricatures. I can barely go anywhere with them.
I don't think that's a fair statement. You don't know the man. Because he upholds what the Bible (which is the word of God) defines as marriage makes him unloving, unforgiving, etc.? I guess God is too then......right?
When someone puts their religious beliefs ahead of someone else's civil rights, IMO that's a hateful position to defend.
Clearly the man is intolerant since his personal opinion on same sex marriage had no direct correlation to how he runs his business.
What did Christ say about homosexuals??? Why is there no instance in the New Testament where Jesus explicitly condemns homosexuality?? Is it possible that it wasn't high on his list of priorities to insure the salvation of man's collective soul?? Or that being gay didn't according to Christ inhibit one's ability to love the Lord with all his or her heart???
No as usual, Christians like Dan Cathy are cherry picking the Bible to defend their own personal bigotry.
A non thinking, analytical Christian is a bad Christian IMO.
Gays aren't the spawn of the devil. They weren't put on this earth to test the fidelity of true Christians to His word.
If we are ALL children of God and made in his image, those of us who were born gay are also his 'miracle'.
This is the thing about sex, faith, and the Bible. Anything in your life that separates you from your own spirit and your relationship with God IMO is a sin.
Sex acts between consenting adults don't damage the soul. But sexual relations that destroy your self esteem and prevent you from recognizing your true worth as a spiritual being is self destructive to the soul, and a sin against God.
I just refuse to believe being born gay is a greater sin than being born heterosexual. Righteousness IMO can be distilled down to a sex act or who a person chooses to love.
When someone puts their religious beliefs ahead of someone else's civil rights, IMO that's a hateful position to defend.
Clearly the man is intolerant since his personal opinion on same sex marriage had no direct correlation to how he runs his business.
What did Christ say about homosexuals??? Why is there no instance in the New Testament where Jesus explicitly condemns homosexuality?? Is it possible that it wasn't high on his list of priorities to insure the salvation of man's collective soul?? Or that being gay didn't according to Christ inhibit one's ability to love the Lord with all his or her heart???
No as usual, Christians like Dan Cathy are cherry picking the Bible to defend their own personal bigotry.
A non thinking, analytical Christian is a bad Christian IMO.
Gays aren't the spawn of the devil. They weren't put on this earth to test the fidelity of true Christians to His word.
If we are ALL children of God and made in his image, those of us who were born gay are also his 'miracle'.
This is the thing about sex, faith, and the Bible. Anything in your life that separates you from your own spirit and your relationship with God IMO is a sin.
Sex acts between consenting adults don't damage the soul. But sexual relations that destroy your self esteem and prevent you from recognizing your true worth as a spiritual being is self destructive to the soul, and a sin against God.
I just refuse to believe being born gay is a greater sin than being born heterosexual. Righteousness IMO can be distilled down to a sex act or who a person chooses to love.
Brilliant, andreboba. Rep added.
Ches, really. You have your right to your opinion but his makes a LOT more sense. Jesus was about love and salvation, NOT micromanaging everyone's sex lives.
When someone puts their religious beliefs ahead of someone else's civil rights, IMO that's a hateful position to defend.
Clearly the man is intolerant since his personal opinion on same sex marriage had no direct correlation to how he runs his business.
What did Christ say about homosexuals??? Why is there no instance in the New Testament where Jesus explicitly condemns homosexuality?? Is it possible that it wasn't high on his list of priorities to insure the salvation of man's collective soul?? Or that being gay didn't according to Christ inhibit one's ability to love the Lord with all his or her heart???
No as usual, Christians like Dan Cathy are cherry picking the Bible to defend their own personal bigotry.
A non thinking, analytical Christian is a bad Christian IMO.
Gays aren't the spawn of the devil. They weren't put on this earth to test the fidelity of true Christians to His word.
If we are ALL children of God and made in his image, those of us who were born gay are also his 'miracle'.
This is the thing about sex, faith, and the Bible. Anything in your life that separates you from your own spirit and your relationship with God IMO is a sin.
Sex acts between consenting adults don't damage the soul. But sexual relations that destroy your self esteem and prevent you from recognizing your true worth as a spiritual being is self destructive to the soul, and a sin against God.
I just refuse to believe being born gay is a greater sin than being born heterosexual. Righteousness IMO can be distilled down to a sex act or who a person chooses to love.
The short answer is that Jesus affirmed the traditional role of marriage as being one man., one woman, one flesh.
The short answer is that Jesus affirmed the traditional role of marriage as being one man., one woman, one flesh.
Christ didn't say it. Timothy did. http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=II%20Timothy%203:16&version=NIV
However, Christ is described as the word incarnate: http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=John%201:1-14&version=NIV
Problem, Jesus Christ was talking about DIVORCE in Mark 10 when he made this statement and was arguing that ANY man or woman who divorces their spouse and marries another commits ADULTERY, a violation of the Ten Commandments and a sin.
He wasn't giving a treatise on the definition of marriage.
"What therefore God has joined together, let no man separate."
So did Christ believe that a woman whose husband beats her should not be allowed to divorce?? Or a man whose wife squanders half their entire life savings to buy shoes shouldn't be allowed to divorce her??
You simply cannot read the Bible without context and a modern interpretation to real life circumstances.
Hiding behind Biblical verses that are taken out of context is disingenuous.
This isn't a faith issue anyway for me.
Believe what you want, but don't try to make the state conform to your faith because you feel Biblically entitled to violate other citizen's civil rights.
IMO Jesus purposefully did not discuss homosexuality, which is profound in hindsight.
Precisely. Plus, there's this little thing called science, which has proven that homosexuality is as natural as breathing. And the religiously inclined are far too wrapped around the mindset of primitive thinking.
Basically, if you want to be blunt, YES...human beings tend to know better on how to define marriage. Being the sapient and rational species that we are, we're very much inclined to figure out the answers, not from a 2000 year old book of contradictions and lies, but from gaining a greater insight through the process of critical thinking and reasoning.
The sad thing is...the ignorant yolks are hellbent on pressing old world ideas and play it off as though...it's irrelevant.
Problem, Jesus Christ was talking about DIVORCE in Mark 10 when he made this statement and was arguing that ANY man or woman who divorces their spouse and marries another commits ADULTERY, a violation of the Ten Commandments and a sin.
He wasn't giving a treatise on the definition of marriage.....
IMO Jesus purposefully did not discuss homosexuality, which is profound in hindsight.