Going White

so when people demean a group of people (maybe the group you are in) and you give a rebutal are you trolling?
or are the people posting fucked stuff about other groups (overweight people, race, or ect)....trolling?
im not sure what you are saying?

another part of this....
a bw was visiting this site and never posted anything against this site but ran her off but a wm was posting porn (never said anything bad either) but no big deal from what i remember.

in this thread and according to the posts this happened. so why was the bw received neg attention but the wm didnt
 
I don't follow. Is this wwbm or interracial. Com because I don't know about you but I came on here for a specific reason

This^.

Some people refuse to get it, they like to play stupid. Or maybe, they aren't playing, LOL.

The best way to troll is to inflict your presence where it is not expected. Most trolls know this and they do. The most respectful thing that the BW in question did was leave.
 
This^.

Some people refuse to get it, they like to play stupid. Or maybe, they aren't playing, LOL.

The best way to troll is to inflict your presence where it is not expected. Most trolls know this and they do. The most respectful thing that the BW in question did was leave.

Agree, I don't recall her getting "run off" of the board, did anyone give her a difficult time?
 
That's a good joke tell another. There are little to no societal challenges for wm/bw relationships the fake koombiyah we're in it together shit is really patronizing.

heres your response to her post where she inferred wwbm and bmww are in the same boat.
thats on pg 23
 
I simply don't understand how that is patronizing. It makes no sense at all. It not patronizing in any way shape, or form. I have no clue why you think it's patronizing. I think that is more on you than her.
You and I have discussed stuff since 09 and I mean this with no judgement. You like to tell people to ignore threads and posters they don't like, its your mantra. Why don't you ignore appolonia then?


Yes, this is wwbm, but she has had nothing to add but thoughtful posts and we have had a gazillion people with an ulterior motive on here being accepted and they show their colors. Averynd once we have someone on here that so far seems real, you all are ready to rake her over the coals.
I find it distasteful and hypocritical.
As long as she is not a troll and don't cross the limit, let her be. If you don't like it, ignore her. Please don't let this place be another shallow place where we judge. So far, she has had a lot of thoughtfulminput and I find it small minded that people have an issue with her here as she is dating IR and could add to the diicussion.


If you don't like her, ignore her, and let the rest of us discuss issues. We have had 100% bad experience in this but let's give her a chance.

If your all about ww/bm with no flexibility ( i.e., hypocritical ) like the new guy., and some otherd.... Just ignore her and let the rest of us communicate if we want to. If we are wrong, time will tell.
this yalls discussion
pg 24......and forward..
hell you can probably go farther back than 23.

fg pointed out the bs.
 
in this thread and according to the posts this happened. so why was the bw received neg attention but the wm didnt

There are people here that don't appreciate his presence either; they feel that he serves to diminish ww bm relations by reducing it to a fetish. You are too self absorbed to take notice of their concerns; too busy trying to justify your own desires to yourself and the world. The folly of the weak troubled soul. I should pity you but you have enough pity for yourself.
 
There are people here that don't appreciate his presence either; they feel that he serves to diminish ww bm relations by reducing it to a fetish. You are too self absorbed to take notice of their concerns; too busy trying to justify your own desires to yourself and the world. The folly of the weak troubled soul. I should pity you but you have enough pity for yourself.

lol
lol
that statement is so dumb...for me to respond to it would be like mike tyson returning a punch to a 5 year old......an intellectual death blow on you and intellectually unfair to you
 
lol
lol
that statement is so dumb...for me to respond to it would be like mike tyson returning a punch to a 5 year old......an intellectual death blow on you and intellectually unfair to you
You can pretend you don't feel sorry for your self if you want toolbag. First start by not being delusional.
 
You can pretend you don't feel sorry for your self if you want toolbag. First start by not being delusional.

so telling people to not diss bw and overweight people and be fair to people is a bad thing?

so since you think its a bad thing then you believe that bw and overweight people are nasty and disgusting.....and its ok to be a hypocrite
 
heres your response to her post where she inferred wwbm and bmww are in the same boat.
thats on pg 23

What thread are you referring to? I need context not just one post by fg. From what I remember a lot of her posts were passively insulting like "hey guys don't worry wm/bw have it just as bad" and that to me was bullshit just like if a woman called bullshit if a man said men have it just has hard as women in the work place.
 
What thread are you referring to? I need context not just one post by fg. From what I remember a lot of her posts were passively insulting like "hey guys don't worry wm/bw have it just as bad" and that to me was bullshit just like if a woman called bullshit if a man said men have it just has hard as women in the work place.

its in this thread.....i thought i stated that maybe i didnt...oh well. but its in this thread. also i stated you can go back farther than 21 and pass it to greater than 23.

afterwards, we can get on the asskissing statement issue you and blissed discussed.
then we can talk about self esteem of bw (u and i mentioned that) and who has it harder in IR. You said bmww (as i recall)...i say its equal because racists are going to hate equally
 
its in this thread.....i thought i stated that maybe i didnt...oh well. but its in this thread. also i stated you can go back farther than 21 and pass it to greater than 23.

afterwards, we can get on the asskissing statement issue you and blissed discussed.
then we can talk about self esteem of bw (u and i mentioned that) and who has it harder in IR. You said bmww (as i recall)...i say its equal because racists are going to hate equally

I think I summed it up perfectly in post 180.
I think others had some really good points as well. Funny thing is racists try to kill and incarcerate bm who date ww. That's not how they usually deal with wm who date bw. People don't usually care since wm are on top
 
I think I summed it up perfectly in post 180.
I think others had some really good points as well. Funny thing is racists try to kill and incarcerate bm who date ww. That's not how they usually deal with wm who date bw. People don't usually care since wm are on top

31 aug 2012 whiteman beaten by blackmen for dating bw...in georgia.

the lovings in virginia that legalize IR.

Heres commentary tyt on a pastor and IR.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=23mx_vRCg64
 
31 aug 2012 whiteman beaten by blackmen for dating bw...in georgia.

the lovings in virginia that legalize IR.

Heres commentary tyt on a pastor and IR.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=23mx_vRCg64

Why do you do shit like this? I didn't say it NEVER happens I said that's not usually what happens.
Since I need to break it down. Wm are in a position of economic and social power their movements aren't as heavily scrutinized as bm. So who they date won't be as heavily scrutinized. You see where I'm going here or do you need me to go further?
 
I think I summed it up perfectly in post 180.
I think others had some really good points as well. Funny thing is racists try to kill and incarcerate bm who date ww. That's not how they usually deal with wm who date bw. People don't usually care since wm are on top

also why was the wm treated differently from the bw as stated by the women here. lets be 100 yall didnt change yalls tune from what i saw...until it was brought up.

also 180 is appolonia.. could you quote it and bring it here.

another thing bw got raped bm got beatened.
 
Again not discounting you're personal experience I do however challenge the premise that wm/bw couples are under the scrutiny that you describe. It doesn't match up to the culture of present day America sorry it just doesn't. I can never recall a time where white women complained about "their" men being taken. One male superiority within the white culture would never allow it since its patriarchal and two there isn't an illusion of a shortage good hard working white men so the complaint would be looked at as crazy. Also on a large scale ww don't see bw as competition the way bw might see ww. Bw aren't the standard of beauty and quite honestly white culture holds thinness as value which most black women don't possess along with features like thicker coarser hair that is foreign to the beauty concept in this country. Again bm grow up in matriarchal households for the most part where a woman is in charge for the majority of their formative years so instead of developing and ownership outlook on "our" women most bm develop a protective nature for women close to them and ambivalence for those who aren't much like dogs (obviously not calling bm dogs but using that as easy example)
Bm have been considered a threat to white manhood because we tend be larger and stronger and that conjures feelings of insecurity immediately as well as the myth we are more endowed than they are (men are incredibly threatened and insecure about the idea of another man being bigger than they are and possibly a better lover) leads to some type of jealousy. Ever wonder why no one loses their shit when Asian men are with white women? It's because they aren't seen as a threat physically (ironically since they are very much a threat intellectually and in a digital world that matters most) there is a persistent myth that they are weaker and less endowed so there isn't anything to worry about. So when a ww chooses a bm the insecurities bubble and quickly rise to the top. Accusations of bottom of the barrel women choosing to be with bm are quickly thrown out, they need to justify why any ww would choose a bm to cover up their own insecurities. I NEVER hear this the other way around. I never hear bm criticizing bw in this way because we don't harbor a superiority complex designed to mask our inferiority complex. Nor do I see bm claiming betrayal in the same way bw do because we don't live in a culture that demands your loyalty because don't expect it opposed to wm who demand a ww's loyalty because their culture is patriarchal so they believe the women owe to them. So the fact that bw aren't considered an aesthetic threat coupled with the fact they live under patriarchal rule, ask any feminist, it's difficult to see ww who would take offense in mass at least not in the way bw do when bm "step out"

Obviously what I am saying is vast generalizations but that's what usually happens in these types of conversations.

Sorry meant 186
 
Back
Top Bottom