Hosts of Guys We F*****D Podcast Catching Heat
- Thread starter glt1980
- Start date
meowkittenmeow
Well-Known Member
FYI, they debunked that decades ago.
Beasty
Well-Known Member
I disagree. It's something that's real and most can't see it, but I know plenty others that do.
When your conscience is on a higher frequency you pick up on things others don't.
meowkittenmeow
Well-Known Member
https://www.vox.com/2014/7/15/5881947/myers-briggs-personality-test-meaningless
https://www.bbc.com/news/blogs-echochambers-28315137
https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smar...lity-test-is-pretty-much-meaningless-9359770/
Regardless, I can't stop people from believing in fairies or gods, so, believe what you want. I wish you the best.
Beasty
Well-Known Member
I'll check it out. BTW it's not a belief unless you think psychology is fake and that Carl Jung was a whack job.
Irrespective of that. I know what I have perceived for myself.
meowkittenmeow
Well-Known Member
It is a belief when it has been debunked yet you still hold faith in it.
Beasty
Well-Known Member
These articles are about debunking the test, no? I haven't looked at that test in well over a decade nor do I put stock into it, as I mentioned before, I don't need a test to type people.
Just because that test may have major short commings doesn't mean the 4 categories of temperament doesn't exist.
Actually if I was going to direct someone to a test or website about it I would direct them to David Kerseys temperament website. Although I haven't been to that site for years myself.
Beasty
Well-Known Member
Those articles are about debunking a test.
Just because a reliable test may not have been found doesn't mean the subject matter is false.
Beasty
Well-Known Member
If you follow that link you'll see that I actually disagreed with someone's test results. That was back in 2014 ish.
meowkittenmeow
Well-Known Member
Watch the final video if you must. The test has been debunked and the individual identifiers are debunked along with it. It is a very old theory with many criticism that doesn't hold up today. But, as I said, believe in what you will and I will respect your beliefs.
meowkittenmeow
Well-Known Member
It's based on a theory by carl jung, the 4 indicators are a product of the test itself.
Beasty
Well-Known Member
Carl Jung didn't develop the Meyers Briggs. So what test are you talking about?
Maybe I would think it was false if I have never perceived it myself. I don't even know how someone would prove it. Don't really care honestly.
Beasty
Well-Known Member
meowkittenmeow
Well-Known Member
You mentioned him. I mentioned it was slightly inspired by him. That's all.
meowkittenmeow
Well-Known Member
No worries m8t.
Beasty
Well-Known Member
Well, there is a reason I chose the hard sciences for my bread and butter. No room for argument.
meowkittenmeow
Well-Known Member
Understandable.Well, there is a reason I chose the hard sciences for my bread and butter. No room for argument.
Madeleine
Well-Known Member
One can’t really debunk Social Science. One can find arguments for and against a theorem. I find myself in one of the MB-types like many others. The question is more, is it useful? I think it can be.
Madeleine
Well-Known Member
Who are „they“?
So according to you women all point their husbands to an early grave?
Studies have shown that married men live longer and are healthier than unmarried.
And besides, it sounds sexist and offensive to me.
Madeleine
Well-Known Member
Boring!Well, there is a reason I chose the hard sciences for my bread and butter. No room for argument.
The world is not just black and white but full of grey shades