Sexual Harassment/Assault Scandals

ColiBreh1 said:
https://twitter.com/CurtisScoon/status/1088040868416765952
ewLzJJ8.jpg


@darkcurry @The Dark King Terry Crwes has done some ridiculous pandering this month.
Click to expand...

That is a spot on description of what Terry Crews is doing. But Terry is an odd fellow; He speaks on racism in the way the media doesn't want you to speak on racism because he has faced backlash for some of his comments on racism and being a black man in this country. So he is so confusing at times.
 
ColiBreh1 said:
Looks like Hollywood might be finally ready to throw Bryan Singer in the bushes:

https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/n...ons-sex-underage-boys-atlantic-expose-1178261
Bryan Singer has been accused by four more men of having sex with them when they were underage in a bombshell exposé in 'The Atlantic' published Wednesday.
Click to expand...
Click to expand...

I just found out that the blockbuster Bryan Singer-directed "Bohemian Rhapsody" film that came out in October was nominated for a bunch Oscars Yesterday. So the only reason Bryan Singer is being thrown under the bus now is because he's competition at the Oscars for other people in Hollywood. They are really some calculating sick fucks.
 
ColiBreh1 said:
I just found out that the blockbuster Bryan Singer-directed "Bohemian Rhapsody" film that came out in October was nominated for a bunch Oscars Yesterday. So the only reason Bryan Singer is being thrown under the bus now is because he's competition at the Oscars for other people in Hollywood. They are really some calculating sick fucks.
Click to expand...


Yeah maybe, the problem is though the accusations against Singer have been known for years and probably true.
Corey Feldman said I believe Singer and other Hollywood heavyweights were routinely having house parties with teenage boys.

Hollywood should have known they couldn't keep putting Singer out there to direct high profile movies and not think his recreational activities wouldn't catch up with him.
Google image search "Bryan singer with boy". Singer's preference in young teenage boys has been talked about for a while.

If Hollywood was coming after Cosby and R Kelly, Singer should have been on their target list much earlier.
 
Last edited:
Beasty said:
Good point but conversing with women should be optional. Enough of them feel that way about men. If there is something you want, you go get it during your personal time. The workplace is supposed to be productive. After they are surrounded by women in the workplace all the time, they will be more receptive to men anyway, believe that....lol.

Another thing is once a person has settled down, having a segregated workplace makes it nearly impossible to cheat, our divorce rate is through the roof. Removing the opposite sex from everyones work place, removes the likelyhood of unnecessary problems and stress.

The only people most need of the opposite sex are already in their lives as friends and relatives. Everything else should be about getting money and enjoying life.

A simple rule between couples when out could be if the server is a man you converse with him, if the server is a woman, she converses with her. A couple should have the option to remove the opposite sex from their lives almost entirely, makes things more simple.
Click to expand...
Conversing with the opposite sex should be optional? Ever considered moving to Saudi Arabia?
 
Madeleine said:
Conversing with the opposite sex should be optional? Ever considered moving to Saudi Arabia?
Click to expand...
That's how women feel about men here in America too.

Everything that's not necessary should be optional. I just solved multiple issues here by simply segregating the workplace.

I made it more productive.

Solved the sexual harassment issues.

Help bring down our divorce rate.

Ended gender domination of fields.

And created an environment where men and women will appreciate each other more.

I dislike unnecessary issues and I feel that men and women alike should be able to pick and choose who they tolerate.
 
Beasty said:
That's how women feel about men here in America too.

Everything that's not necessary should be optional. I just solved multiple issues here by simply segregating the workplace.

I made it more productive.

Solved the sexual harassment issues.

Help bring down our divorce rate.

Ended gender domination of fields.

And created an environment where men and women will appreciate each other more.

I dislike unnecessary issues and I feel that men and women alike should be able to pick and choose who they tolerate.
Click to expand...
Lol. Well done. You killed a lot of flies with one slap.
 
Beasty said:
That's how women feel about men here in America too.

Everything that's not necessary should be optional. I just solved multiple issues here by simply segregating the workplace.

I made it more productive.

Solved the sexual harassment issues.

Help bring down our divorce rate.

Ended gender domination of fields.

And created an environment where men and women will appreciate each other more.

I dislike unnecessary issues and I feel that men and women alike should be able to pick and choose who they tolerate.
Click to expand...

As I said before on the segregation front there should ALWAYS be that third option for those who WANT to be/work together because among those people you will find less sexist, racist, misandrist people and people that actually wants to work on humanity getting better.

Oh not to mention of course the freedom of choice without judgement.
 
ColiBreh1 said:
Variety Magazine put out this news report today live from Sundance:

Click to expand...
I have a problem with these two men.

In the Daily Mail article, they stressed at Sundance they were not paid for the documentary. As if money was never a motive.
Did they explain in the documentary the two failed lawsuits that each one brought against Michael Jackson's estate after his death?
Did they also explain that both denied ever being sexually abused by him?

Wade Robson:
He testified in Jackson’s defense at the singer’s 2005 criminal trial, saying he had spent the night at Jackson’s Neverland Ranch more than 20 times and usually slept in Jackson’s room, but Jackson never molested him. Jackson was acquitted in that trial.

Then in 2013, four years after the singer’s death, Robson sued the (now very lucrative) Jackson estate for what his attorneys described as "molestation that spanned a seven-year period."

A court ruled in 2015 that Robson had filed his lawsuit too late to get any of Jackson’s estate.
That left two remaining defendants, both corporate entities owned by Jackson in his lifetime: MJJ Productions, Inc., and MJJ Ventures, Inc.

The judge ruled Tuesday that those two corporate defendants could not be held responsible for Robson’s exposure to Jackson.

James Safechuck:
Safechuck denied he was molested by Jackson in documents filed prior to Jackson's 2005 criminal trial when he was mentioned as a possible abuse victim.
Employees said Safechuck was a frequent guest at Neverland with one maid stating she saw Safechuck and Jackson together in bed and nude from the waist up.

Those claims, however, couldn't be heard by the jury in 2005 as Safechuck never made a claim of sexual abuse.

In May 2013, Safechuck added his name to a suit brought by Wade Robson, who (remember) also defended Jackson back in 2005 but since changed his position, alleging Jackson forced him to perform sex acts.

...Safechuck's claim of sexual abuse is similar to Robson's, adding Safechuck claims he was molested from the age of 10 to about 14 or 15.
"Once you start having children and you see what it's all about...your perspective on life changes," a source said regarding Safechuck's decision to file the suit.


 
samson1701 said:
They're coming back around for Mike, now. Prepare to mute the King.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...of-Michael-Jackson-pedophile-say-critics.html
Click to expand...

Like Kobe his fans(myself included) Ain't having it. There is HUGE pushback to this. It is a damn shame and show just how brainwashed people are that a documentary that doesn't actually feature any sort of investigation or research and simply consists of descriptive testimonies by two proven liars in court are convincing people. Wow!

Luckily a lot of people are hitting critics back on twitter with acounter documentary that exposes the truth about Wade Robson:

But of course the media is trying to sweep that under the rug.
 
darkcurry said:
Like Kobe his fans(myself included) Ain't having it. There is HUGE pushback to this. It is a damn shame and show just how brainwashed people are that a documentary that doesn't actually feature any sort of investigation or research and simply consists of descriptive testimonies by two proven liars in court are convincing people. Wow!

Luckily a lot of people are hitting critics back on twitter with acounter documentary that exposes the truth about Wade Robson:

But of course the media is trying to sweep that under the rug.
Click to expand...
Well the one good thing about him being dead is this kind of thing won't get much air. It will die out quickly.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom