Beasty
Well-Known Member
Thankfully we have at least three other viable candidates running.
3 other candidates running? Like who?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Thankfully we have at least three other viable candidates running.
Someone that is actively investigated by the FBI (now twice) is unfit for the serious responsibility of the highest office in the land. Someone that has displayed a clearly documented history of corruption, collusion, pay-for-play politics, and engages in obstruction of justice all while serving as a public servant is patently unfit. Thankfully we have at least three other viable candidates running.
Trump being sued for scamming other Americans including veterans and family of KIA veterans
A man shown a disdain for veterans and a draft dodger
Have alleged ties to the mob (how can you not have dealing with the mob when you are in the casino business)
Yeah he's a good one
I'm not a Trump supporter so why you're reply to me is all about Trump, God only knows.
3 other candidates running? Like who?
You voting for someone that's not advertising? Lol. That's like trying to win a race with no gas.
The at least three other candidates running for president who aren't subject to an active investigation by the FBI for various crimes.
You vote for president based on advertisements?
![]()
What country? Mongolia? There's only two people in the race in the US. Otherwise you may as well say I'm running if you include people that don't advertise.
The at least three other candidates running for president who aren't subject to an active investigation by the FBI for various crimes.
Only someone bordering on brain dead thinks the only people running for election is Clinton and Trump. But that's not you...you're a smart guy.
http://bfy.tw/72QQ
Only someone bordering on brain dead thinks the only people running for election is Clinton and Trump. But that's not you...you're a smart guy.
http://bfy.tw/72QQ
If you really study what Gary Johnson and Jill Stein's views are on a host of issues, you wouldn't consider them viable candidates.
Respectfully, this is probably the most disingenuous statement in this thread so far as it is equally true/un-true for almost any candidate.
"If you really study what Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump's views are on a host of issues, you wouldn't consider them viable candidates."
See how easy that was?
Neither Gary Johnson nor Jill Stein can win. Don't Nader this election
The Progressive policies will be DOA if Hillary wins.
[YOUTUBE]L6e1U0Nkmjg[/YOUTUBE]
Respectfully, this is probably the most disingenuous statement in this thread so far as it is equally true/un-true for almost any candidate.
"If you really study what Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump's views are on a host of issues, you wouldn't consider them viable candidates."
See how easy that was?
Respectfully, this is probably the most disingenuous statement in this thread so far as it is equally true/un-true for almost any candidate.
"If you really study what Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump's views are on a host of issues, you wouldn't consider them viable candidates."
See how easy that was?
I don't agree, focus on the mid terms, that's where our voices can really be heard. And trust and believe the entire country will be DOA if Trump wins. Every Clinton naysayer has no solution for if she loses. The alternative to big bad Hilary is xenophobic racist who cheats on his taxes and defrauds his business partners. It says a lot about a person who has absolutely no business partners that will say anything good about him. 40 years of business and you can't find a few people to say you're a great business man, the very platform he's running.
So he has no foreign policy experience, no domestic experience, no tangible economic experience, and somehow he's the best choice. How does this make sense to anyone?