Bliss
Well-Known Member
These are the arguments:
"How dare she do that with all that money and she didn't earn a dime of it."
"She inherited the money through marriage."
Without beating a dead horse, AGAIN, she contributed to the marriage.
It's as ridiculous as someone saying you are not entitled to your children because you didn't earn the right, since you didn't carry the baby or go through (hard) labor - all you were really was a sperm donor.
But let me get this straight. It's her money, just like it's Kobe's, but she isn't allowed to do with her money what he has done with his....because of the way she got it? The exact same action, using the same US tender bills, but she can't, and he can. Hmmm, need to track down other divorced people, people gifted money, lawsuit victors, Unemployment collectors, welfare recipients, lottery winners and people willed money and inform them of this "rule". Do as we say, not as we do.
