TRUMP Thread

You try it out and if it doesn't work trying something else geesh.
Take away the stress people have over housing and other bills for a couple of years while we recover from this thing

 

Why that number when he doesn't know how long the quarantine will be?

Mitt Romney said 1,000 a month. At least that's an actual rate. Finally a suit who isn't a complete tard.

 

Trial and error is supposed to be how we run government?

LOLOL

 

It was 1k flat not per month and seriously how is that any more helpful? Let's say it's 1k a month why that number? My expenses in NY to pay rent is 3 times that how would that help someone like me if I needed it?
1k a month so I can sleep in my car?
Again you don't like it because Bernie said it

 

Lol.

I think it should be more but it's not retarded because it's actually based on something (time, duh) and it's better than nothing.

So out of the choices I would have to go with the one that has an actual basis. Not just a random number.

Sure lie to yourself all you want to hide the fact that you don't mind idiots running government. Your lie. Your problem.

 

"Sure they voted for the Black guy so anything can happen I guess"

Joe Biden storms to victory over Bernie Sanders in key state of Florida and in Illinois - and turnout is UP despite coronavirus crisis


https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...tml?ito=push-notification&ci=10682&si=1808535

 

Hmm what did he say about cuba again?

 

How is 1k any less random?

 

It is based on time dude. Wow!!

 

What are you talking about
1k total
Or 1250 a week per Bernie how is it any different.

 

That's what you do when you don't know how long it's going to last.

When is the last time you actually thought about anything?

Why give someone 65k when it may be for only 2 months?

 

Do you know what a rate is?

1000 per month is not comprehendable to you?

1250 a week is a rate. That's not what you said earlier.

 

Again it's 1k FLAT

 

Dude you're either really are dumb or you need a new game.

Your playing dumb isn't serving you well.

I can't have a serious conversation with someone that can't understand something this basic.

Later.

 

The daily social Distancing show? Damn.......

https://www.facebook.com/video.php?v=1550458685118972

 

Trump's changing reactions to the novel Coronavirus.

 

Coronavirus shows Donald Trump was right all this time about China
Madison Gesiotto, opinion contributor MSN.com

3/9/2020

Donald Trump has been insisting for years that our country has been too economically dependent on China, so it is sad that it took a global public health crisis to prove he was right all this time. When he began imposing strategic tariffs on China in response to its long history of abusive trade practices, the liberals all of a sudden became free trade fundamentalists, predicting that this new "trade war" would harm the American economy because we have relied so heavily on cheap Chinese imports for so many years. Instead, it was the Chinese economy that took a hard hit, while our economy at home surged to its strongest performance in half a century.

What happened? The answer is simple. Just as manufacturers had once moved their factories to China to take advantage of cheap labor, weak regulations, and lower tariffs on exports to developed economies, these companies are now fleeing China for other countries that offer similar business advantages without all of the political baggage from Beijing.

The coronavirus outbreak around the world could dramatically accelerate the manufacturing exodus from China, as companies begin to recognize the perils of giving the authoritarian country so much power over their supply chains. After Beijing placed hundreds of millions of its citizens under an oppressive quarantine, effectively shutting down most of its economy for weeks, the need to diversify production locations should have become abundantly clear to business leaders around the world.

Businesses that followed the lead of the president, however, were already ahead of the curve. The executives understood those artificial advantages that China always utilized to prop up its economy were going to disappear under the pressure of his tariffs, and the steps they took in anticipation of that, such as relocating production to other countries, ultimately reduced their exposure to the coronavirus crisis and its damaging consequences.

The reason for disengaging from China in the first place was to protect American workers and businesses. While the coronavirus could not have been predicted, there is always a significant risk from overdependence on any single country, especially an authoritarian one that will routinely break the rules in its quest to get ahead. The coronavirus merely happened to be the crisis that demonstrated once and for all why the "free trade" status quo that was rooted in past decades was so dangerous to our country.

More...
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/opin...waDXFV8Voajoxvj4Y55-ikvBm2vqTX8ut7pYY8msg_sMc