whikle
Well-Known Member
Actually, I don't agree. I didn't suggest that you should use weights as a substitute for cardio activity. My point was that this kind of workout would tend to contribute more to total calories consumed in a day. I also don't agree that heavy, again a relative term, leads to more definition, perhaps to more muscle size. Typically, women who're interested in gaining more definition are less concerned about muscle size and they generally utilize an approach involving lighter weights, higher reps and more cardio work, at least in my experience.
I do agree that you can "preserve" more muscle by using a heavier routine, while you are in a weight, body fat, loss mode. But, again, it's the combination diet and calories consumed during aerobic activity that's responsible for creating more muscle definition, because you are losing body fat. The increased definition comes because you maintain your muscle and you lose body fat. This is the technique that most bodybuilders, including myself, utilize to get ready for contests.
I think we're talking about the same thing in different ways, but I'm still not sure I agree... Maybe we mean something different by "definition"... Definition will only happen once you've stripped fat, allowing the muscle to show, so I agree that the combination of diet and calorie consumption leads to that, but if you didn't build muscle in the mean time there won't be anything "defined" about your look once the fat is gone. Just cos women do it, doesn't mean it's the most effective way. Women are typically scared of bulking up and building muscle, but that's generally not going to happen without a specific bodybuilding regime. Lifting weights that are progressively challenging, I think, is a more efficient way to see results.
And on reading again, the line I bolded sums it up.. You're talking about having the muscle to begin with, I'm assuming you don't.