Bliss
Well-Known Member
Fox fired him, NBC fired him and now he's "quitting" GQ.
He's clearly unhinged.
TRUMP Thread
- Thread starter Blacktiger2005
- Start date
He's clearly unhinged.
Thump
Well-Known Member
I think "unhinged" is a little strong. He comes off to me as a true believer, and true believers get burnt out quickly.
Bliss
Well-Known Member
Brian Ross is a scurrilous liar who knew what he was doing.
It wasn't Trump, it was a member of his transitional team. It was all legal. But he ran with the story anyway, causing the Stock market to drop 350 points and the liberal MSM and their shills to go bananas. Way to uplift the country.
In addition to that, Mueller was just forced to terminate his most experienced and trusted counterintelligence investigator, senior FBI agent Peter Strzok, from the current investigation, after he was discovered texting out anti-trump propaganda. Keep in mind, Strzok was the lead investigator into Hillary's probe of her private email account of mishandling classified information. (Where she was allowed to talk to Comey off the record)
Seriously, the alt-Left's behavior outrageously supersedes the alt-right's in terms of Alinsky-esq tactics to usurp our democratically elected President. Your Party can no longer fake any semblence of decency it had so-masterfully manufactured for decades upon its most vulnerable constituents. The DNC dont go high, they drag you down into their swamp.
Peach State Scholar
Well-Known Member
Exactly. This is a textbook example of journalistic integrity. One of their reporters made a mistake so they owned up to that mistake and corrected it. It's what separates legitimate news sites like ABC from the WND, Breitbarts, and InfoWars of the world.
Last edited:
Bliss
Well-Known Member
Whut? Lol. You must not be privvy yo this deranged man's Chicken Little hyperbole.
Seriously Thump, have you ever read some of his profanity-laced, racist tweets? No wonder even alt-left MSNBC fired the quack. He's not burned out, he's lost the plot, lol.
https://pjmedia.com/trending/2017/0...stages-furious-rabies-based-twitter-meltdown/
Thump
Well-Known Member
If calling someone a "nazi fuck" on Twitter is a sign of deranged behavior, what kind of mental issue do you believe a person who tweets out threats of nuclear war has?
Bliss
Well-Known Member
My deranged comment pertained to his hysterical Pearl Harbor analogy, and, "We are at War with Russia!!"
As for tweeting out "threats of nuclear war" as you noted, is that what he's said?
And if it is, did they come after NK's deranged despot flew out test missiles? Jong Un's actual threats of nuclear war aimed at us has been building for years, so at what point do you want America to cease emboldening him with just sanction responses? While sanctions do hinder his country, he's managed somehow to accelerate his nuclear missile arsenal.
So serious question: Can you show me a tweet that threatens "nuclear war", as opposed to a "very severe" response tweet to N. Korea's actual nuclear threats to us.
It's important distinction, in my eyes.
Lastly, despite any severe warnings towards Kim Jong Un's escalating behavior, President Trump has thus far continued to rely on sanctions and diplomatic pressure, just as President Obama did.
andreboba
Well-Known Member
Keith Olbermann is a brilliant social commentator and you can FACT CHECK everything he says. You could learn a lot listening to his posts on the GQ YT site.
If you've followed Olbermann's career, the man gets bored very easily. He felt like he was at the point with GQ where he was writing the same commentaries about Trump, so once Flynn pled guilty, Keith decided it was time to end it.
Also, Olbermann worked for GQ.....for FREE. NO salary whatsoever. He was just trying to get out the truth about our most corrupt POTUS in modern American history.
Hard to quit something when you aren't being paid.
The man is known for being extremely mercurial intellectually and if the particular endeavor doesn't stimulate him emotionally and mentally anymore, he'll tap out.
That's part of the reason why he had multiple stints at ESPN.
And be clear, Keith NEVER worked for Fox (NEWS). He worked for their cable sports news department.
It's only speculation that Olbermann was fired from MSNBC. At the time he was their top rated commentary host and was the one broadcaster solely responsible for turning MSNBC into the voice of the left. Allegedly, MSNBC didn't meet his new contract demands and they let him walk.
Others have suggested Keith was too radical for MSNBC who wanted to be a more moderate news source.
For those of us who used to watch Olbermann on MSNBC, he was their biggest star and most passionate truth teller and it wasn't even close.
Olbermann has a rep of being hard to work with because he's a self righteous idealist.
That's not necessarily a bad thing.
Everyone who's ever worked with Olbermann acknowledges the man's brilliance.
There's nothing 'unhinged' about him, except that he has no time to hold hands with fools.
andreboba
Well-Known Member
Who besides Trump had the authority to tell Gen. Flynn, head of the NSA, to get in contact with the Russians WITHOUT authorization by the president-elect?? Trump gave the order, Flynn complied. No one gives that kind of order to the director of the NSA without Trump's approval.
And yes, contacting the Russians after the election was legal, so why have so many people in Trump's administration LIED about their 'legal' Russian contacts??
Why are you covering up something that doesn't need to be covered up??
As for FBI Russia counterintelligence agent Strzok, he was fired this past summer over negative Trump text messages he sent to a colleague. There are dozens of FBI agents working with Mueller's investigation and the facts will be the facts.
Mueller is also a registered Republican, or did you forget??
LOL at you thinking Trump was duly elected, or that he didn't play a role in Russia's attempts to tilt the election in his favor.
I'm sure Gen. Flynn will have a different story to tell.
It's going to be extremely difficult for the Right to attack Flynn's credibility, since Trump himself defended all his actions.
And stop saying 'alt left'. There isn't one.
Steve Bannon defined the term alt-right when describing Breitbart news, not the Left.
That would include neo Nazis, White supremacists and White nationalists, the latter of which Bannon has admitted he is one.
Even staunch Republicans will admit there have been a number of troubling contacts between the Trump administration before, during and after his election, unlike anything we've ever seen with any other country before.
If you replaced Russia with China, or Saudi Arabia, I wonder how many Trump supporters would pretend there's nothing to see here??
The image below should give every American pause. Trump held a private Oval office meeting with Russian Foreign Minster Sergei Lavrov and Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak,(both believed to be agents of the Russian FSB), and told ALL American media they weren't allowed to attend.
No POTUS in U.S. history has ever had this kind of meeting in the Oval Office with the Russians. Sorry, but something about Trump stinks.
/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/54718609/GettyImages_681529392.0.jpg)
He's too close to a country many in our intelligence community still consider an enemy.
Iran's top ally is RUSSIA.
Syria's top ally is RUSSIA.
North Korea and China's top ally is RUSSIA.
The Trump campaign already knew the Russians were using social media to exclusively help his campaign, and then arranged a Trump Tower meeting with Trump Jr. to provide damaging info on HRC.
When Mueller finally completes his report and presents it to Congress, Trump will resign.
Thump
Well-Known Member
On September 23rd Trump tweeted about the North Korean Foreign Minister
North Korea (as well as other people) interpreted his words as a declaration of war.
Let me ask you this question do you actually like Trump or do you only support him because he is on your political "team"?
Bliss
Well-Known Member
What he tweeted doesn't mean NUCLEAR War. He could be deposed, assassinated, removed by China, bombed, etc.
When you say 'other people', that really means Liberals.
It's not whether l like Trump or not, as he has a personality not suited for everyone.
I don't have a traditional political 'team' because the far left and right both make me ill. For me, it is, and always will be, country first. Americans first. IDC what creed culture etc..take care of home first, and then you can better take care of the rest of the world.
Bliss
Well-Known Member
Trump and Tiger have history ... they've golfed together in the past.'
andreboba
Well-Known Member
Kim Jung Un could be assassinated?? Deposed???lol
Trump has already threatened N. Korea with fire and fury earlier this year. Most military strategists have said you can't defeat N. Korea with conventional warfare, so to me that means nukes.
WHen you have a POTUS who had to be told why we don't use our nuclear weapons if we have them, I take his threat against the N. Korean U.N. envoy to mean a military attack and potential nuclear strike.
THis is why our idiot president needs to stop conducting foreign policy through twitter.
Madeleine
Well-Known Member
One can come up with all types of explanations what it COULD mean, but it's more relevant how the international community understands it. His wording was understood as a threat of war by most in the international community including North Korea itself. He doesn't understand that as President of the United States EVERY SINGLE WORD you speak or write publicly matters. You can't make a verbal threat of war when at the same time your foreign minister is trying to get something done through diplomacy.
And if he thinks America first means it's a very smart move to withdraw from NATO then we will see his friend Putin continue to push into Western Europe as he's been doing secretly and not so secretly the past years. It will make the US neither safer nor happier to leave the playing field of Eastern Europe to Putin.
Last edited:
Beasty
Well-Known Member
Military strategists said that? Forget about dotard for a second. You have any links?
Bliss
Well-Known Member
"What it means to you", emotionally is irrelevant because you always just jump to the worst most dramatic meaning. What "military strategists" mean is we can't beat them with boots on the ground because of their large army. Theyve said a sky show would be the best strategy.
Stop quoting the President when he said no such thing, AB. Trump's enemy MSNBC host Joe Scarborough is your ooonly source, who said "a source told him", that. FOH with your source-told-a-source- so-it-must-be-true, diatribe.
For someone who like to talk politics, you sure love to gossip. And that's because you take the admitted liberal-far-Left controlled media as gospel... then have the gall to question why l no longer bother to accept MSM as the purveyors of truth? Stop it, lol.
flaminghetero
Well-Known Member
Says a fox news koolaid drinker.
A "far left media" would be riding Trump every day for his tax returns....just like the far right cried for Obama's birth certificate.
A far left media would be exposing killer cops instead of blaming the victims.
Bliss
Well-Known Member
Hi Madeline,
Trump is not the first U.S President to threaten Kim Jung Un.
Please note...
Obama condemns North Korean nuclear test as 'grave threat to regional security'
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/...a-earthquake-nuclear-test-20160908-story.html
Keep in mind, Kim was NOT listening to a lick of it.
Not from Obama's threats, or the UN Council's.
He's IGNORED all of them, until President Trump told that bitch boy to hold up.
(Still, he thumbs his nose)
Excerpt from Link (2016)
"North Korea said it conducted a "higher level" nuclear test explosion on Friday that will allow it to finally build an array of stronger, smaller and lighter nuclear weapons, a move strongly condemned by the U.N. Security Council which promised new measures against Pyongyang.
The North's fifth atomic test and the second in eight months brought the U.N.'s most powerful body into emergency session, just three days after it strongly condemned North Korea's latest ballistic missile launches..."
President Trump uses Twitter, Obama used press conferences. What's the difference? - both warned Kim to stop his shit, but l didn't see you or AB include that Obama's threats "matter(ed)".
See this pic below? These are press conference stills of THREE Presidents responding to North Korea
That's a powerful public response.
Furthermore, Bush's "axis of evil" comment which comprised of North Korea, Iran and Iraq was most definitely met with world and local condemnation.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/1796034.stm
Bush stood his ground though..
"...President Bush maintained his tough stance on Friday, saying "all the three countries I mentioned are now on notice that we intend to take their development of weapons of mass destruction very seriously"
Finally...
"American attempts to counter North Korea’s nuclear program did not begin last week when President Trump promised to unleash “fire and fury” against the isolated government. For decades, Mr. Trump’s predecessors have waded into the diplomatic mire, trying to threaten or cajole North Korea’s ruling family into abandoning the country’s weapons programs. Each failed."
Story:
https://mobile.nytimes.com/2017/08/...a-threat.html?referer=https://www.google.com/
Madeleine
Well-Known Member
Yeah, I haven't submitted an analysis on the linguistics of past presidents because we were talking about Trump. What we need is China. I think someone must have explained that to him before his last Asia trip from the way he spoke with them.Hi Madeline,
Trump is not the first U.S President to threaten Kim Jung Un.
Please note...
Obama condemns North Korean nuclear test as 'grave threat to regional security'
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/...a-earthquake-nuclear-test-20160908-story.html
Keep in mind, Kim was NOT listening to a lick of it.
Not from Obama's threats, or the UN Council's.
He's IGNORED all of them, until President Trump told that bitch boy to hold up.
(Still, he thumbs his nose)
Excerpt from Link (2016)
"North Korea said it conducted a "higher level" nuclear test explosion on Friday that will allow it to finally build an array of stronger, smaller and lighter nuclear weapons, a move strongly condemned by the U.N. Security Council which promised new measures against Pyongyang.
The North's fifth atomic test and the second in eight months brought the U.N.'s most powerful body into emergency session, just three days after it strongly condemned North Korea's latest ballistic missile launches..."
President Trump uses Twitter, Obama used press conferences. What's the difference? - both warned Kim to stop his shit, but l didn't see you or AB include that Obama's threats "matter(ed)".
See this pic below? These are press conference stills of THREE Presidents responding to North Korea
That's a powerful public response.
Furthermore, Bush's "axis of evil" comment which comprised of North Korea, Iran and Iraq was most definitely met with world and local condemnation.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/1796034.stm
Bush stood his ground though..
"...President Bush maintained his tough stance on Friday, saying "all the three countries I mentioned are now on notice that we intend to take their development of weapons of mass destruction very seriously"
Finally...
"American attempts to counter North Korea’s nuclear program did not begin last week when President Trump promised to unleash “fire and fury” against the isolated government. For decades, Mr. Trump’s predecessors have waded into the diplomatic mire, trying to threaten or cajole North Korea’s ruling family into abandoning the country’s weapons programs. Each failed."
Story:
https://mobile.nytimes.com/2017/08/...a-threat.html?referer=https://www.google.com/