xoxo
Well-Known Member
What's up beautiful? The insurgency of stupidity is talking hold on this forum, it might be time to take a break or bounce.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
im not sure i understand
What's up beautiful? The insurgency of stupidity is talking hold on this forum, it might be time take a break or bounce.
Y'all negros can read now
She said
Her race, "our race" as she put it, that being the White race should have more SSA admixture given the onset of
GLOBAL WARMING!
Mixing with US will give HER RACE longevity on earth!
That's what she said!
Some blacks consider biracial children to be black…the “new” black. Thirty years from now this will be the case most definitely as both black women and men continue to accelerate in marrying and dating outside of their race. Even some whites consider biracial people to be black…note President Obama who is biracial…not black. Even some biracial people go for black. People like Halle Berry consider themselves black. Charles Barkley refers to his 2 children as black…not biracial. I think the reason why most of those black women consider this to be a black family is because the makeup of it is mostly black in their mind. Is it right? No, but welcome to America. It is what it is. Sad that we have to deal with color politics, but that’s life.
Don't let it tick you off. Things have labels...just put your own name on your own label and go with what's in "your" jar. Don't let others label you...Tiger Woods doesn't.![]()
Well, do you not think that this is a good thing? I mean you sound like you are worried somewhat about this. I believe that this is a good thing. I will tell you why in two words...global warming. Melanin in a white person's skin would be a godsend. No one is better suited for literally saving the white race from total obliteration as the black man and black woman. Mixing with them will give our race a much better chance of longevity on earth...feel me?.![]()
Ok but it really isn't the child I'm talking but more the couple. The woman is still white.
I think the reason why most of those black women consider this to be a black family is because the makeup of it is mostly black in their mind. Is it right? No, but welcome to America. It is what it is. Sad that we have to deal with color politics, but that’s life.
It's a common trope among dumb Negros who think White folks are now more open to Black people because White people are going extinct. White folks who articulate their racialist sentiments with respect to this topic are
1. Racist, and not into Black people and want White racial preservation
or
2. (As open heart picked up from Regina) Have a concern or fear of latent Black features appearing in Whites who have recent African ancestry...ie Fear of the throwback baby!
I know you're speaking of the white woman. That's why I said this...
But the thing is their talking like a white couple that adopts a black child would then be a black family. Like all you need is 1 black person in the family and suddenly is all black. I think that's crazy.
One thing I forgot in my analysis is that Black women in slavery conferred racial status upon their offspring. Her kids were slaves, a female child could carry a White mans seed, while a male child could only mate with Black women. Hopefully this dynamic is still not in peoples mind. (ie slave mentality)
Regina, I have said you are a racialist, this is not an insult. ( many racialist are racist/eugenicist however). I'm not one of these people who doesn't believe in so called racial difference, it's just that biodiversity is so great, that racial classification is untenable. None of these racial classifications are transhistorical, either in name, genotype or phenotype. Which is why unending preservation of a particular phenotype or culture is nonsensical, whether it's oceanic aborigines (who have what is thought of as a distinctive phenotype) or pygmies around the world, none of these people/cultures are guaranteed existence. Whether is through intersexual selection or a cataclysmic event, human beings will adapt, look differently and change culturally.
I think I'd better start following your strategies. Perhaps I'll stay offline for a few days, (maybe 7 to 10 or so) then come back online and post. Eventually the condition of the forum should improve in future months.Hey U! :wink:
The negativity and idiocy are definitely annoying. I have done the bolded by default. It's good to leave and come back. That way you appreciate the good and leave the bad at your leisure.
Please don't ever bounce. We need you around here!
Right...all should be acknowledged...but maybe they don't have a better term for it yet. I say why label it a all. Can't we just call them a family and leave it at that? But in the world of color politics, here in America, things are not that simple.
I think I'd better start following your strategies. Perhaps I'll stay offline for a few days, (maybe 7 to 10 or so) then come back online and post. Eventually the condition of the forum should improve in future months.
Exactly they are not. See I think there has to be a label. If the news articles would have just said family had a cross burned on their lawn the racism they faced wouldn't be there. But see I think there is a different motivation behind burning a cross on a black family's lawn and burning one on a interracial couples lawn. Both are disgusting none the less but IR couples undergo attacks even from people who wouldn't do such as that to a black couple. I strongly believe that this happened to the particular couple b/c someone didn't like seeing that black man with that white woman where women in this group were saying the only motivation was the man was black.
I strongly believe that this happened to the particular couple b/c someone didn't like seeing that black man with that white woman where women in this group were saying the only motivation was the man was black
Hey U! :wink:
The negativity and idiocy are definitely annoying. I have done the bolded by default. It's good to leave and come back. That way you appreciate the good and leave the bad at your leisure.
Please don't ever bounce. We need you around here!
We definitely don't wanna be without him!

What I meant was white people are 65%-70% or so percent of the population and among that percentage 2/3 have trace amounts of SSA (around 1-2%). Which is nothing and you are right it's 1/3 not to 2. There aren't enough Black folks in this country to get a white population that looks likes "Puertorican Whites", especially in a 100 years, especially given the admixture in AA, many of whom would not be counted as Black in Hispanic countries. You would need to include Hispanic whites in your analysis, who have a higher rate of admixture.
But this a racialist argument, and you are constantly making the assertion that there is "definable race". White people that have something else in them? Give me a break, as if there is such a thing a racial purity, going back all so called Whites have non European ancestors. The recombination of genes throughout generations has just produced a distinct phenotype, the other new world models are not applicable to the U.S given Whites outnumber Africans and Natives by a large number and if mixed at an equal rate, you would see Argentina not Brazil.
I'm concerned with race as a social construct in the U.S and I see there being a permanent Black underclass, no matter what they look like. God forbid we see the White privilege of the Hispanic/Latin American world take shape here. The more whites have been aware of their African ancestry, the more disdain they have shown to wards Blacks.
Well, if you feel that labels are a necessity, then don't get your feathers ruffled when you come across labels that aren't to your liking.
How can assure that racism isn't happening if we don't take notice of the race of people that are being discriminated?
Well...do you think the cross would have been burned in their yard if he had been a white man?
No. I've never heard of wp getting crosses burned on their yard unless they dating bp, have adopted black children, or is somehow helping the progression of bp.
In this case I don't think the cross would have been burned if he had a bw, and I don't think it would have been burned if she had a white husband. I think it was burned b/c they were both apart of the equation.
According to prosecutors, a group of four African-American Marines entered the Pietrzak home at Camp Pendleton in October 2008. Sgt. Pietrzak was hog-tied and forced to watch helplessly as his wife was repeatedly assaulted with a sex toy. The assailants tortured the couple for hours before killing them both.
In the aftermath, law enforcement officials found racist remarks spray-painted on the walls of the home. The words "N----- Lover" were found near the master bedroom and on a mirror in the bathroom. Sgt. Pietrzak was white. Quiana Jenkins was black.
The home was ransacked and jewelry and other items were taken, investigators said. A fire was set, apparently in an effort to destroy evidence.