A black family or an Interracial family?

im not sure i understand

Well, I always like to look at the intriguing side of things. Global warming is becoming a more serious issue. Most whites are not known for having much melanin in our skin. Those of us who don't have much melanin in our skin will be more prone to skin cancer as this global warming effect continues to progress in the coming decades. But when we have children from black men, the children will have a nice ample supply of melanin to protect them from the effects of global warming.

It's just a thought...a wild one but an interesting one nonetheless.:mrgreen:

To get an ideal of how serious the subject of global warming & skin cancer is becoming click here and look at how many sites there are on (thousands of them) the subject:
http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=ie7&q=skin+cancer+global+warming&rls=com.microsoft:en-us:IE-SearchBox&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&rlz=1I7TSNA_en#q=skin+cancer+global+warming&hl=en&rls=com.microsoft:en-us:IE-SearchBox&rlz=1I7TSNA_en&prmd=ivns&ei=V72TTbuKAZK4twfQwpl2&start=10&sa=N&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.&fp=ccb61cac0dc95407
 
What's up beautiful? The insurgency of stupidity is talking hold on this forum, it might be time take a break or bounce.

Hey U! :wink:

The negativity and idiocy are definitely annoying. I have done the bolded by default. It's good to leave and come back. That way you appreciate the good and leave the bad at your leisure.

Please don't ever bounce. We need you around here!
 
Y'all negros can read now

She said

Her race, "our race" as she put it, that being the White race should have more SSA admixture given the onset of
GLOBAL WARMING!



Mixing with US will give HER RACE longevity on earth!

That's what she said!


Oh my goodness!:smt087 I'm sorry...did I say something wrong?​
 
Some blacks consider biracial children to be black…the “new” black. Thirty years from now this will be the case most definitely as both black women and men continue to accelerate in marrying and dating outside of their race. Even some whites consider biracial people to be black…note President Obama who is biracial…not black. Even some biracial people go for black. People like Halle Berry consider themselves black. Charles Barkley refers to his 2 children as black…not biracial. I think the reason why most of those black women consider this to be a black family is because the makeup of it is mostly black in their mind. Is it right? No, but welcome to America. It is what it is. Sad that we have to deal with color politics, but that’s life.

Don't let it tick you off. Things have labels...just put your own name on your own label and go with what's in "your" jar. Don't let others label you...Tiger Woods doesn't.:D

Ok but it really isn't the child I'm talking but more the couple. The woman is still white.
 
Well, do you not think that this is a good thing? I mean you sound like you are worried somewhat about this. I believe that this is a good thing. I will tell you why in two words...global warming. Melanin in a white person's skin would be a godsend. No one is better suited for literally saving the white race from total obliteration as the black man and black woman. Mixing with them will give our race a much better chance of longevity on earth...feel me?.;)

No I'm not worried about the white race declining. I don't see it as good or bad thing. Well honestly I'd rather white not be the majority in the US. However I don't want any race obliterated.
 
Ok but it really isn't the child I'm talking but more the couple. The woman is still white.

I know you're speaking of the white woman. That's why I said this...

I think the reason why most of those black women consider this to be a black family is because the makeup of it is mostly black in their mind. Is it right? No, but welcome to America. It is what it is. Sad that we have to deal with color politics, but that’s life.
 
It's a common trope among dumb Negros who think White folks are now more open to Black people because White people are going extinct. White folks who articulate their racialist sentiments with respect to this topic are

1. Racist, and not into Black people and want White racial preservation

or

2. (As open heart picked up from Regina) Have a concern or fear of latent Black features appearing in Whites who have recent African ancestry...ie Fear of the throwback baby!

I do not have a fear at all. I don't think whites having black features are throwbacks or a bad thing at all. But it will def change how people look at race. If whites couples are naturally having brown children you can't exactly classify them as solely black children and solely black families anymore.
 
I know you're speaking of the white woman. That's why I said this...

But the thing is their talking like a white couple that adopts a black child would then be a black family. Like all you need is 1 black person in the family and suddenly is all black. I think that's crazy.
 
But the thing is their talking like a white couple that adopts a black child would then be a black family. Like all you need is 1 black person in the family and suddenly is all black. I think that's crazy.

Right...all should be acknowledged...but maybe they don't have a better term for it yet. I say why label it a all. Can't we just call them a family and leave it at that? But in the world of color politics, here in America, things are not that simple.
 
One thing I forgot in my analysis is that Black women in slavery conferred racial status upon their offspring. Her kids were slaves, a female child could carry a White mans seed, while a male child could only mate with Black women. Hopefully this dynamic is still not in peoples mind. (ie slave mentality)

Regina, I have said you are a racialist, this is not an insult. ( many racialist are racist/eugenicist however). I'm not one of these people who doesn't believe in so called racial difference, it's just that biodiversity is so great, that racial classification is untenable. None of these racial classifications are transhistorical, either in name, genotype or phenotype. Which is why unending preservation of a particular phenotype or culture is nonsensical, whether it's oceanic aborigines (who have what is thought of as a distinctive phenotype) or pygmies around the world, none of these people/cultures are guaranteed existence. Whether is through intersexual selection or a cataclysmic event, human beings will adapt, look differently and change culturally.

I don't have alot of understanding of the word racialist. But I do think there is genetic differences among different races. But I don't think that is a significance difference. There is just small differences as to why people coming from different continents have differences in appearance. I believe that we all came from Africa and outside of Africa mutations took place to create new genetics like eye color for example. I don't think those differences mean squat really but none the less I think they are there and I find all our differences beautiful and wonderful thing. But I also find the intermixing of our differences equally as beautiful.
 
Hey U! :wink:

The negativity and idiocy are definitely annoying. I have done the bolded by default. It's good to leave and come back. That way you appreciate the good and leave the bad at your leisure.

Please don't ever bounce. We need you around here!
I think I'd better start following your strategies. Perhaps I'll stay offline for a few days, (maybe 7 to 10 or so) then come back online and post. Eventually the condition of the forum should improve in future months.
 
Right...all should be acknowledged...but maybe they don't have a better term for it yet. I say why label it a all. Can't we just call them a family and leave it at that? But in the world of color politics, here in America, things are not that simple.

Exactly they are not. See I think there has to be a label. If the news articles would have just said family had a cross burned on their lawn the racism they faced wouldn't be there. But see I think there is a different motivation behind burning a cross on a black family's lawn and burning one on a interracial couples lawn. Both are disgusting none the less but IR couples undergo attacks even from people who wouldn't do such as that to a black couple. I strongly believe that this happened to the particular couple b/c someone didn't like seeing that black man with that white woman where women in this group were saying the only motivation was the man was black.
 
I think I'd better start following your strategies. Perhaps I'll stay offline for a few days, (maybe 7 to 10 or so) then come back online and post. Eventually the condition of the forum should improve in future months.

It's hard to say what the board will be like cause it's very unpredictable, but for your own piece of mind, it's best to take a break and come back whenever you want. If it's still full of BS, you sign off and wait and try again.
 
Exactly they are not. See I think there has to be a label. If the news articles would have just said family had a cross burned on their lawn the racism they faced wouldn't be there. But see I think there is a different motivation behind burning a cross on a black family's lawn and burning one on a interracial couples lawn. Both are disgusting none the less but IR couples undergo attacks even from people who wouldn't do such as that to a black couple. I strongly believe that this happened to the particular couple b/c someone didn't like seeing that black man with that white woman where women in this group were saying the only motivation was the man was black.

Well, if you feel that labels are a necessity, then don't get your feathers ruffled when you come across labels that aren't to your liking.

I strongly believe that this happened to the particular couple b/c someone didn't like seeing that black man with that white woman where women in this group were saying the only motivation was the man was black

Well...do you think the cross would have been burned in their yard if he had been a white man?
 
Hey U! :wink:

The negativity and idiocy are definitely annoying. I have done the bolded by default. It's good to leave and come back. That way you appreciate the good and leave the bad at your leisure.

Please don't ever bounce. We need you around here!

We definitely don't wanna be without him!
 
What I meant was white people are 65%-70% or so percent of the population and among that percentage 2/3 have trace amounts of SSA (around 1-2%). Which is nothing and you are right it's 1/3 not to 2. There aren't enough Black folks in this country to get a white population that looks likes "Puertorican Whites", especially in a 100 years, especially given the admixture in AA, many of whom would not be counted as Black in Hispanic countries. You would need to include Hispanic whites in your analysis, who have a higher rate of admixture.

But this a racialist argument, and you are constantly making the assertion that there is "definable race". White people that have something else in them? Give me a break, as if there is such a thing a racial purity, going back all so called Whites have non European ancestors. The recombination of genes throughout generations has just produced a distinct phenotype, the other new world models are not applicable to the U.S given Whites outnumber Africans and Natives by a large number and if mixed at an equal rate, you would see Argentina not Brazil.

I'm concerned with race as a social construct in the U.S and I see there being a permanent Black underclass, no matter what they look like. God forbid we see the White privilege of the Hispanic/Latin American world take shape here. The more whites have been aware of their African ancestry, the more disdain they have shown to wards Blacks.

I don't think there needs to be alot of mixing for this happen among whites. But I'm not only talking about black mixing with white I'm also talk about asian, and hispanic mixing with white aswell. I do think atleast in the next 200 years you will see a white couples giving birth to children that have genetics more common of other races. If one of my children were to have children with a wp and so on and say my great great grandchildren ended up with what we classify in society today as a white phenotype (they be 1/16 black) and then they ended up with another person with a white phenotype say 1/8 or 1/16 black they have a chance at having a child with more melanin than the average wp. Then wp can have features like curly black hair and semi full lips and we would never think twice about it but you put those features on someone with the complexion that is a little darker people then contribute them as being black features where on a white phenotype nobody noticed them. I'm not saying this will be a widespread thing or anything. Sure that would take much longer. It's you never really hear of it happening now but I think there will be a few out there and that is all it would take for it to start changing perceptions.

Well mutations have took place since people left Africa and that is what I'm talking about. Ex. a gene has been found in wp that is partly responsible for skin color. Other races do not have this gene. I'm not talking about all races of the US mixing together creating non racial society. I'm simply stating just as bp having children that have the biracial phenotype that wp will also be doing the same thing. I used puertoricans just an example to say that it could happen. I didn't mean to apply that there would be no such thing as races in the US in 100 yrs. I most def think they will.

I am also concerned about that. I don't really agree with your last sentence though.
 
Well, if you feel that labels are a necessity, then don't get your feathers ruffled when you come across labels that aren't to your liking.

How can assure that racism isn't happening if we don't take notice of the race of people that are being discriminated?


Well...do you think the cross would have been burned in their yard if he had been a white man?

No. I've never heard of wp getting crosses burned on their yard unless they dating bp, have adopted black children, or is somehow helping the progression of bp.

In this case I don't think the cross would have been burned if he had a bw, and I don't think it would have been burned if she had a white husband. I think it was burned b/c they were both apart of the equation.
 
No. I've never heard of wp getting crosses burned on their yard unless they dating bp, have adopted black children, or is somehow helping the progression of bp.

In this case I don't think the cross would have been burned if he had a bw, and I don't think it would have been burned if she had a white husband. I think it was burned b/c they were both apart of the equation.

Well, that has been the case many(black men and their black wives) times before...there's nothing written in concrete that says it doesn't happen anymore.

Did you read about the white marine who was murdered along with his black wife by fellow black marines?


image5242088x.jpg


According to prosecutors, a group of four African-American Marines entered the Pietrzak home at Camp Pendleton in October 2008. Sgt. Pietrzak was hog-tied and forced to watch helplessly as his wife was repeatedly assaulted with a sex toy. The assailants tortured the couple for hours before killing them both.

In the aftermath, law enforcement officials found racist remarks spray-painted on the walls of the home. The words "N----- Lover" were found near the master bedroom and on a mirror in the bathroom. Sgt. Pietrzak was white. Quiana Jenkins was black.

The home was ransacked and jewelry and other items were taken, investigators said. A fire was set, apparently in an effort to destroy evidence.
 
Back
Top Bottom