New Book of WW in Harlem in the 20's and 30's.

JamalSpunky said:
But, then again, if black males are weak and chicken shit enough to take it then mabe that explains why we are at the bottom of the economic ladder because no other males other than African American males even tolerate women of their own race/religion/ethnicity browbeating them over such an issue. And no other group of men come across like such gutless punks when such an issue arise.
Click to expand...

+10 Would rep you if I could.

Even Hollywood is making fun of this

[YOUTUBE]GGQmCdORynM[/YOUTUBE]
 
medullaslashin said:
hahahha... :smt043

Surprising insight on hollywood's part. wonder if that scene was written by a black dude
Click to expand...

The main reason BM are so punkish is because we are a matriarchal people.

We actually see the world through the eyes of our mothers and grandmothers...We have a negro in this very thread just like that.:smt042

What makes a group is patriarchal or matriarchal comes down to the FEMALES.

WW for example...have a boy child preferance...therefore her people are patriarchal.

The BW on the other hand.. have a girl child preferance...making us a matriarchal/laughing stock people.

That's why we have Rondell instead of Ron.
Dontrell instead on Don.
Marquise instead of Marcus.
Lamicheal instead of Micheal.
Even sissy names such as Shawn is too macho for our community...LaShawn or Shawntrell is how we roll.

Truth be told...the ONLY thing African about us that wasn't outlawed is the matriarchal system.

They let us keep that weak shi.t..... for reasons that are obvious.
If matriarchy was a positive it would have been banned right along with everything else.

Chancellor Williams wrote in the 'destruction of Black civilization' that Africa was conquered SEXUALLY before she was invaded militarilly.

A matriarchal system is the only system that can be conquered sexually.

Take away all the racism and we'll still find a sexy,nice-nasty way to wind up DEAD LAST.

We think everything is cute.

Throw something on our side of the fence...we keep it...throw something on the white boy's side of the fence and he'll throw it back.

While others leave their inheritance and businesses to their sons....we leave ours to our daughters.

We do not invest in our sons yet we expect them to perform as if we do.
We send our sons to the pen and our daughters to Penn state.

The day we put our sons first like the latinos asians whites ect ect....there will be a new Jerusalem.

Then and only then will we have our day in the sun.
 
JamalSpunky said:
Who determines who is genuine? When can someone "cross the color lines" and try new things without having the public ASSUME that all they are trying to do is take advantage of so-called black art forms? Why doesn't Justin Beiber get slapped around for that (hanging out with his posse that includes gangsta rappers from time to time). Why didn't Justin Timberlake ahead of him get any grief for going the R&B route when he hooked up with Timberland? If his ex Brittany had attempted that the black community would have told her to "hold up" and yes that chorus would be led by black women because in case your head has been buried in the sand it is ALWAYS led by black women. Do you want me to provide links of black ladies writing articles for Grio about the epidemic of white chicks showing up in R&B videos? You want me to point you to a site like Shadow and Act where some black women wrote some insane article tha started off attacking Miley for supposedly degrading black women during her VMA performance (once more....no complaints against Robin Thicke who got off scott free just as Justin Timberlake did with that Janet Jackson halftime show)? It gets tiring after awhile. Some white rap duo puts out the biggest rap hip song ever and some white male (Thicke) becomes the first R&B male singer in a long time to have a long-running #1 hit on Billboards Top 100, and yet it is white women who are trying to appropriate "our culture"? Give me a break.

And the cool things about black dudes I come across is that, for example, they don't have a problem with Thicke whatsoever. This is in contrats to about six years back when Joss Stone, a white female with an affinity for black music, was trying to make some headway herself in the soul market and even found herself on R&B stations for a brief moment. About a half dozen times I came across black women in the office who either complained about this or turned the station when her song came on as they whined about her being played on a black station in the first place. That type of mentality didn't just pop up overnight. It's been there for awhile.



Maybe. But that one major rap magazine mag (either The Source or XXL) named her one of the best new artists two years ago when she came on the scene. So there are people who think she is talented.And that PISSED off Azelia Banks (sp?) who went nuts over her inclusion. Banks ain't complaining whenever some white dude gets such honors.



Go read further about the book. It wasn't just about white men and white society ostracizing white women for having the audacity to hang out with the colored folk; they got grief from black people too, particularly black women. There are some excerpts on book sites which carry links to this book and one of those excerpts make that point.
Click to expand...
:smt023:smt023:smt023

Grand slam homerun...!

You sent that shit into McCovey cove...
 
flaminghetero said:
The main reason BM are so punkish is because we are a matriarchal people.

We actually see the world through the eyes of our mothers and grandmothers...We have a negro in this very thread just like that.:smt042

What makes a group is patriarchal or matriarchal comes down to the FEMALES.

WW for example...have a boy child preferance...therefore her people are patriarchal.

The BW on the other hand.. have a girl child preferance...making us a matriarchal/laughing stock people.

That's why we have Rondell instead of Ron.
Dontrell instead on Don.
Marquise instead of Marcus.
Lamicheal instead of Micheal.
Even sissy names such as Shawn is too macho for our community...LaShawn or Shawntrell is how we roll.

Truth be told...the ONLY thing African about us that wasn't outlawed is the matriarchal system.

They let us keep that weak shi.t..... for reasons that are obvious.
If matriarchy was a positive it would have been banned right along with everything else.

Chancellor Williams wrote in the 'destruction of Black civilization' that Africa was conquered SEXUALLY before she was invaded militarilly.

A matriarchal system is the only system that can be conquered sexually.

Take away all the racism and we'll still find a sexy,nice-nasty way to wind up DEAD LAST.

We think everything is cute.

Throw something on our side of the fence...we keep it...throw something on the white boy's side of the fence and he'll throw it back.

While others leave their inheritance and businesses to their sons....we leave ours to our daughters.

We do not invest in our sons yet we expect them to perform as if we do.
We send our sons to the pen and our daughters to Penn state.

The day we put our sons first like the latinos asians whites ect ect....there will be a new Jerusalem.

Then and only then will we have our day in the sun.
Click to expand...
my man you sir know what the hell you are talking about, ?
I can't tell you how many times in childhood I went thru this
and had my black ex wife had her way I would be a beer drinking sitting on the couch shuffling ass negro scared of my own shadow
 
free816 said:
my man you sir know what the hell you are talking about, ?
I can't tell you how many times in childhood I went thru this
and had my black ex wife had her way I would be a beer drinking sitting on the couch shuffling ass negro scared of my own shadow
Click to expand...
Thank you.
 
Look up the book Black Like Me. It was even made into a movie starring James Whitmore as the white reporter who disguises himself as black, sees and experiences the treatment of black people in the South during Jim Crow first hand.
 
I read the NYT piece on the book and it made the family sound highly intelligent, yet deeply broken, with the wife as some sort of arch-fetishist.
 
TERRASTAR18 said:
wrong on the first, wrong on the 2nd, wrong the 3rd. the end of white supremacy will come when black ppl take care and ownership of their communities. no amount of f^&king and sucking is gonna change that. tbh what you and the other guy are doing is part of the problem.
Click to expand...
BW are obessed with controlling BM...

That's why you're here....pretending to be a BM.:smt081
 
JamalSpunky said:
Who determines who is genuine? When can someone "cross the color lines" and try new things without having the public ASSUME that all they are trying to do is take advantage of so-called black art forms? Why doesn't Justin Beiber get slapped around for that (hanging out with his posse that includes gangsta rappers from time to time). Why didn't Justin Timberlake ahead of him get any grief for going the R&B route when he hooked up with Timberland? If his ex Brittany had attempted that the black community would have told her to "hold up" and yes that chorus would be led by black women because in case your head has been buried in the sand it is ALWAYS led by black women. Do you want me to provide links of black ladies writing articles for Grio about the epidemic of white chicks showing up in R&B videos? You want me to point you to a site like Shadow and Act where some black women wrote some insane article tha started off attacking Miley for supposedly degrading black women during her VMA performance (once more....no complaints against Robin Thicke who got off scott free just as Justin Timberlake did with that Janet Jackson halftime show)? It gets tiring after awhile. Some white rap duo puts out the biggest rap hip song ever and some white male (Thicke) becomes the first R&B male singer in a long time to have a long-running #1 hit on Billboards Top 100, and yet it is white women who are trying to appropriate "our culture"? Give me a break.

And the cool things about black dudes I come across is that, for example, they don't have a problem with Thicke whatsoever. This is in contrats to about six years back when Joss Stone, a white female with an affinity for black music, was trying to make some headway herself in the soul market and even found herself on R&B stations for a brief moment. About a half dozen times I came across black women in the office who either complained about this or turned the station when her song came on as they whined about her being played on a black station in the first place. That type of mentality didn't just pop up overnight. It's been there for awhile.



Maybe. But that one major rap magazine mag (either The Source or XXL) named her one of the best new artists two years ago when she came on the scene. So there are people who think she is talented.And that PISSED off Azelia Banks (sp?) who went nuts over her inclusion. Banks ain't complaining whenever some white dude gets such honors.



Go read further about the book. It wasn't just about white men and white society ostracizing white women for having the audacity to hang out with the colored folk; they got grief from black people too, particularly black women. There are some excerpts on book sites which carry links to this book and one of those excerpts make that point.
Click to expand...

it called common sense.

point1- when was miley ever seen with any black ppl circa hannah montana? she only with them now to show she's a bad girl to steer away from her good girl image.
point2- both justins have been criticised in the black community but they have sellout blacks like jay-z and pharrel giving them cover so it gets in the white mainstream media. ppl support a robin thicke because he genuinely embraces r n b. just like jon b before him. ppl would criticise brit because she has no real talent. no one criticises adele or amy winehouse.
point3- macklemore has been criticised because he tried to lecture ppl on hip hop and had a so-called gay anthem even though he is not gay.
point4-there is no mentality besides your obvious color issues.
point5-xxl is run by whites and iggy is managed by a raccoon named ti. getting positions in a mag has nothing to do with journalistic merit or else why would gwyneth paltrow been named most beauitful over scar jo, gabrielle union,etc.
point6- azaelia takes issue with someone who has no talent getting recognition over her. she wouldn't have an issue with macklemore because he has talent and isn't her direct competition. jay-z vs nas,christina vs britney, bsb vs nsync. dmx vs ja rule.
point7- where did i say bm/ww didn't get discriminated by black people. the point is whatever happened inthe black community pales in comparison to the lynchings and jim crow. bp didn't have institutional power.
 
TERRASTAR18 said:
it called common sense.

point1- when was miley ever seen with any black ppl circa hannah montana? she only with them now to show she's a bad girl to steer away from her good girl image.
point2- both justins have been criticised in the black community but they have sellout blacks like jay-z and pharrel giving them cover so it gets in the white mainstream media. ppl support a robin thicke because he genuinely embraces r n b. just like jon b before him. ppl would criticise brit because she has no real talent. no one criticises adele or amy winehouse.
point3- macklemore has been criticised because he tried to lecture ppl on hip hop and had a so-called gay anthem even though he is not gay.
point4-there is no mentality besides your obvious color issues.
point5-xxl is run by whites and iggy is managed by a raccoon named ti. getting positions in a mag has nothing to do with journalistic merit or else why would gwyneth paltrow been named most beauitful over scar jo, gabrielle union,etc.
point6- azaelia takes issue with someone who has no talent getting recognition over her. she wouldn't have an issue with macklemore because he has talent and isn't her direct competition. jay-z vs nas,christina vs britney, bsb vs nsync. dmx vs ja rule.
point7- where did i say bm/ww didn't get discriminated by black people. the point is whatever happened inthe black community pales in comparison to the lynchings and jim crow. bp didn't have institutional power.
Click to expand...

Hmmm.. I think I could make 7 point comments on most of these comments but I won't right now.. seems like it would likely fall on deaf ears anyway.

Soooooo about the book. I decided to download kindle version. Very interesting read so far. Has anyone else actually decided to read it?
 
Ellemental said:
Hmmm.. I think I could make 7 point comments on most of these comments but I won't right now.. seems like it would likely fall on deaf ears anyway.

Soooooo about the book. I decided to download kindle version. Very interesting read so far. Has anyone else actually decided to read it?
Click to expand...
:smt017
 
flaminghetero said:
Yeah right..

We had ownership of our communities and all it took was a few tricks here and there and voila....we have NOTHING.

Read 'the destruction of black civilization' by chancellor williams.
Click to expand...


great find, you surprised me for once. you are still a raccoon though. are you familiar with any of the works by van setima, dr ben, john henrik clark or anta diop.
we never had control over our community in the united states and that was what i was speaking about.
 
flaminghetero said:
I didn't say the talk could or should be helped....just pointing out the double standards.
Click to expand...

It's supposed to be a family reunion. A gathering of family. I have never seen the double standards you speak of. If your family members have an issue with a member who has married outside the race, then don't go.
 
Gorath said:
It's supposed to be a family reunion. A gathering of family. I have never seen the double standards you speak of. If your family members have an issue with a member who has married outside the race, then don't go.
Click to expand...

I have to agree with hetero. My sister, for example, critisizes me when I date or get friendly with white women, but then she does similar with white men. If I call her out on it, she'll act oblivious to it.
 
MilkandCoffee said:
I have to agree with hetero. My sister, for example, critisizes me when I date or get friendly with white women, but then she does similar with white men. If I call her out on it, she'll act oblivious to it.
Click to expand...

That's why it is called sibling differences. We all have them(if you have brothers or sisters). My sister has not dated a white or Latino man and she made sure she didn't. She often asked me,"What do you see in white girls?" I answered her saying,"They're nicer to me," and she hit me a number of times for it. I couldn't hit her back because of the fact that we were living with mom then. And mom had the final say. I had no autonomy when it came to family. But I was a kid. And my sister got away with a lot of shit growing up.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom